Cargando…
Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms
AIMS: Automated interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) using deep neural networks (DNNs) has gained much attention recently. While the initial results have been encouraging, limited attention has been paid to whether such results can be trusted, which is paramount for their clinical implementat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab045 |
_version_ | 1784840810156523520 |
---|---|
author | Vranken, Jeroen F van de Leur, Rutger R Gupta, Deepak K Juarez Orozco, Luis E Hassink, Rutger J van der Harst, Pim Doevendans, Pieter A Gulshad, Sadaf van Es, René |
author_facet | Vranken, Jeroen F van de Leur, Rutger R Gupta, Deepak K Juarez Orozco, Luis E Hassink, Rutger J van der Harst, Pim Doevendans, Pieter A Gulshad, Sadaf van Es, René |
author_sort | Vranken, Jeroen F |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Automated interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) using deep neural networks (DNNs) has gained much attention recently. While the initial results have been encouraging, limited attention has been paid to whether such results can be trusted, which is paramount for their clinical implementation. This study aims to systematically investigate uncertainty estimation techniques for automated classification of ECGs using DNNs and to gain insight into its utility through a clinical simulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: On a total of 526 656 ECGs from three different datasets, six different methods for estimation of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty were systematically investigated. The methods were evaluated based on ranking, calibration, and robustness against out-of-distribution data. Furthermore, a clinical simulation was performed where increasing uncertainty thresholds were applied to achieve a clinically acceptable performance. Finally, the correspondence between the uncertainty of ECGs and the lack of interpretational agreement between cardiologists was estimated. Results demonstrated the largest benefit when modelling both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Notably, the combination of variational inference with Bayesian decomposition and ensemble with auxiliary output outperformed the other methods. The clinical simulation showed that the accuracy of the algorithm increased as uncertain predictions were referred to the physician. Moreover, high uncertainty in DNN-based ECG classification strongly corresponded with a lower diagnostic agreement in cardiologist’s interpretation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Uncertainty estimation is warranted in automated DNN-based ECG classification and its accurate estimation enables intermediate quality control in the clinical implementation of deep learning. This is an important step towards the clinical applicability of automated ECG diagnosis using DNNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9707930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97079302023-01-27 Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms Vranken, Jeroen F van de Leur, Rutger R Gupta, Deepak K Juarez Orozco, Luis E Hassink, Rutger J van der Harst, Pim Doevendans, Pieter A Gulshad, Sadaf van Es, René Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Articles AIMS: Automated interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) using deep neural networks (DNNs) has gained much attention recently. While the initial results have been encouraging, limited attention has been paid to whether such results can be trusted, which is paramount for their clinical implementation. This study aims to systematically investigate uncertainty estimation techniques for automated classification of ECGs using DNNs and to gain insight into its utility through a clinical simulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: On a total of 526 656 ECGs from three different datasets, six different methods for estimation of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty were systematically investigated. The methods were evaluated based on ranking, calibration, and robustness against out-of-distribution data. Furthermore, a clinical simulation was performed where increasing uncertainty thresholds were applied to achieve a clinically acceptable performance. Finally, the correspondence between the uncertainty of ECGs and the lack of interpretational agreement between cardiologists was estimated. Results demonstrated the largest benefit when modelling both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Notably, the combination of variational inference with Bayesian decomposition and ensemble with auxiliary output outperformed the other methods. The clinical simulation showed that the accuracy of the algorithm increased as uncertain predictions were referred to the physician. Moreover, high uncertainty in DNN-based ECG classification strongly corresponded with a lower diagnostic agreement in cardiologist’s interpretation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Uncertainty estimation is warranted in automated DNN-based ECG classification and its accurate estimation enables intermediate quality control in the clinical implementation of deep learning. This is an important step towards the clinical applicability of automated ECG diagnosis using DNNs. Oxford University Press 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9707930/ /pubmed/36713602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab045 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vranken, Jeroen F van de Leur, Rutger R Gupta, Deepak K Juarez Orozco, Luis E Hassink, Rutger J van der Harst, Pim Doevendans, Pieter A Gulshad, Sadaf van Es, René Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title | Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title_full | Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title_short | Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
title_sort | uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vrankenjeroenf uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT vandeleurrutgerr uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT guptadeepakk uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT juarezorozcoluise uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT hassinkrutgerj uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT vanderharstpim uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT doevendanspietera uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT gulshadsadaf uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms AT vanesrene uncertaintyestimationfordeeplearningbasedautomatedanalysisof12leadelectrocardiograms |