Cargando…

Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England

AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years witho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Nathan R, Groves, Lara, Dickerson, Carissa, Ochs, Andreas, Pang, Dong, Lawton, Sarah, Hurst, Michael, Pollock, Kevin G, Sugrue, Daniel M, Tsang, Carmen, Arden, Chris, Wyn Davies, David, Martin, Anne Celine, Sandler, Belinda, Gordon, Jason, Farooqui, Usman, Clifton, David, Mallen, Christian, Rogers, Jennifer, Camm, Alan John, Cohen, Alexander T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009
_version_ 1784840817573101568
author Hill, Nathan R
Groves, Lara
Dickerson, Carissa
Ochs, Andreas
Pang, Dong
Lawton, Sarah
Hurst, Michael
Pollock, Kevin G
Sugrue, Daniel M
Tsang, Carmen
Arden, Chris
Wyn Davies, David
Martin, Anne Celine
Sandler, Belinda
Gordon, Jason
Farooqui, Usman
Clifton, David
Mallen, Christian
Rogers, Jennifer
Camm, Alan John
Cohen, Alexander T
author_facet Hill, Nathan R
Groves, Lara
Dickerson, Carissa
Ochs, Andreas
Pang, Dong
Lawton, Sarah
Hurst, Michael
Pollock, Kevin G
Sugrue, Daniel M
Tsang, Carmen
Arden, Chris
Wyn Davies, David
Martin, Anne Celine
Sandler, Belinda
Gordon, Jason
Farooqui, Usman
Clifton, David
Mallen, Christian
Rogers, Jennifer
Camm, Alan John
Cohen, Alexander T
author_sort Hill, Nathan R
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years without AF diagnosis; n = 23 745) from six general practices in England were randomized into intervention and control arms. Intervention arm participants, identified by the algorithm as high risk of undiagnosed AF (n = 944), were invited for diagnostic testing (n = 256 consented); those who did not accept the invitation, and all control arm participants, were managed routinely. The primary endpoint was the proportion of AF, atrial flutter, and fast atrial tachycardia diagnoses during the trial (June 2019–February 2021) in high-risk participants. Atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias were diagnosed in 5.63% and 4.93% of high-risk participants in intervention and control arms, respectively {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.15 (0.77–1.73), P = 0.486}. Among intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing (28.1%), 9.41% received AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses [vs. 4.93% (control); OR (95% CI): 2.24 (1.31–3.73), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The AF risk-prediction algorithm accurately identified high-risk participants in both arms. While the proportions of AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses were not significantly different between high-risk arms, intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing were twice as likely to receive arrhythmia diagnoses compared with routine care. The algorithm could be a valuable tool to select primary care groups at high risk of undiagnosed AF who may benefit from diagnostic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97079632023-01-27 Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England Hill, Nathan R Groves, Lara Dickerson, Carissa Ochs, Andreas Pang, Dong Lawton, Sarah Hurst, Michael Pollock, Kevin G Sugrue, Daniel M Tsang, Carmen Arden, Chris Wyn Davies, David Martin, Anne Celine Sandler, Belinda Gordon, Jason Farooqui, Usman Clifton, David Mallen, Christian Rogers, Jennifer Camm, Alan John Cohen, Alexander T Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years without AF diagnosis; n = 23 745) from six general practices in England were randomized into intervention and control arms. Intervention arm participants, identified by the algorithm as high risk of undiagnosed AF (n = 944), were invited for diagnostic testing (n = 256 consented); those who did not accept the invitation, and all control arm participants, were managed routinely. The primary endpoint was the proportion of AF, atrial flutter, and fast atrial tachycardia diagnoses during the trial (June 2019–February 2021) in high-risk participants. Atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias were diagnosed in 5.63% and 4.93% of high-risk participants in intervention and control arms, respectively {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.15 (0.77–1.73), P = 0.486}. Among intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing (28.1%), 9.41% received AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses [vs. 4.93% (control); OR (95% CI): 2.24 (1.31–3.73), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The AF risk-prediction algorithm accurately identified high-risk participants in both arms. While the proportions of AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses were not significantly different between high-risk arms, intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing were twice as likely to receive arrhythmia diagnoses compared with routine care. The algorithm could be a valuable tool to select primary care groups at high risk of undiagnosed AF who may benefit from diagnostic testing. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9707963/ /pubmed/36713002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Hill, Nathan R
Groves, Lara
Dickerson, Carissa
Ochs, Andreas
Pang, Dong
Lawton, Sarah
Hurst, Michael
Pollock, Kevin G
Sugrue, Daniel M
Tsang, Carmen
Arden, Chris
Wyn Davies, David
Martin, Anne Celine
Sandler, Belinda
Gordon, Jason
Farooqui, Usman
Clifton, David
Mallen, Christian
Rogers, Jennifer
Camm, Alan John
Cohen, Alexander T
Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title_full Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title_fullStr Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title_full_unstemmed Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title_short Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
title_sort identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (pulse-ai) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in england
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009
work_keys_str_mv AT hillnathanr identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT groveslara identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT dickersoncarissa identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT ochsandreas identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT pangdong identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT lawtonsarah identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT hurstmichael identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT pollockkeving identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT sugruedanielm identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT tsangcarmen identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT ardenchris identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT wyndaviesdavid identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT martinanneceline identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT sandlerbelinda identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT gordonjason identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT farooquiusman identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT cliftondavid identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT mallenchristian identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT rogersjennifer identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT cammalanjohn identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland
AT cohenalexandert identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland