Cargando…
Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England
AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years witho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009 |
_version_ | 1784840817573101568 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Nathan R Groves, Lara Dickerson, Carissa Ochs, Andreas Pang, Dong Lawton, Sarah Hurst, Michael Pollock, Kevin G Sugrue, Daniel M Tsang, Carmen Arden, Chris Wyn Davies, David Martin, Anne Celine Sandler, Belinda Gordon, Jason Farooqui, Usman Clifton, David Mallen, Christian Rogers, Jennifer Camm, Alan John Cohen, Alexander T |
author_facet | Hill, Nathan R Groves, Lara Dickerson, Carissa Ochs, Andreas Pang, Dong Lawton, Sarah Hurst, Michael Pollock, Kevin G Sugrue, Daniel M Tsang, Carmen Arden, Chris Wyn Davies, David Martin, Anne Celine Sandler, Belinda Gordon, Jason Farooqui, Usman Clifton, David Mallen, Christian Rogers, Jennifer Camm, Alan John Cohen, Alexander T |
author_sort | Hill, Nathan R |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years without AF diagnosis; n = 23 745) from six general practices in England were randomized into intervention and control arms. Intervention arm participants, identified by the algorithm as high risk of undiagnosed AF (n = 944), were invited for diagnostic testing (n = 256 consented); those who did not accept the invitation, and all control arm participants, were managed routinely. The primary endpoint was the proportion of AF, atrial flutter, and fast atrial tachycardia diagnoses during the trial (June 2019–February 2021) in high-risk participants. Atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias were diagnosed in 5.63% and 4.93% of high-risk participants in intervention and control arms, respectively {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.15 (0.77–1.73), P = 0.486}. Among intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing (28.1%), 9.41% received AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses [vs. 4.93% (control); OR (95% CI): 2.24 (1.31–3.73), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The AF risk-prediction algorithm accurately identified high-risk participants in both arms. While the proportions of AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses were not significantly different between high-risk arms, intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing were twice as likely to receive arrhythmia diagnoses compared with routine care. The algorithm could be a valuable tool to select primary care groups at high risk of undiagnosed AF who may benefit from diagnostic testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9707963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97079632023-01-27 Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England Hill, Nathan R Groves, Lara Dickerson, Carissa Ochs, Andreas Pang, Dong Lawton, Sarah Hurst, Michael Pollock, Kevin G Sugrue, Daniel M Tsang, Carmen Arden, Chris Wyn Davies, David Martin, Anne Celine Sandler, Belinda Gordon, Jason Farooqui, Usman Clifton, David Mallen, Christian Rogers, Jennifer Camm, Alan John Cohen, Alexander T Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: The aim of the PULsE-AI trial was to assess the effectiveness of a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm in conjunction with diagnostic testing for identifying undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care in England. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years without AF diagnosis; n = 23 745) from six general practices in England were randomized into intervention and control arms. Intervention arm participants, identified by the algorithm as high risk of undiagnosed AF (n = 944), were invited for diagnostic testing (n = 256 consented); those who did not accept the invitation, and all control arm participants, were managed routinely. The primary endpoint was the proportion of AF, atrial flutter, and fast atrial tachycardia diagnoses during the trial (June 2019–February 2021) in high-risk participants. Atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias were diagnosed in 5.63% and 4.93% of high-risk participants in intervention and control arms, respectively {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.15 (0.77–1.73), P = 0.486}. Among intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing (28.1%), 9.41% received AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses [vs. 4.93% (control); OR (95% CI): 2.24 (1.31–3.73), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The AF risk-prediction algorithm accurately identified high-risk participants in both arms. While the proportions of AF and related arrhythmia diagnoses were not significantly different between high-risk arms, intervention arm participants who underwent diagnostic testing were twice as likely to receive arrhythmia diagnoses compared with routine care. The algorithm could be a valuable tool to select primary care groups at high risk of undiagnosed AF who may benefit from diagnostic testing. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9707963/ /pubmed/36713002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hill, Nathan R Groves, Lara Dickerson, Carissa Ochs, Andreas Pang, Dong Lawton, Sarah Hurst, Michael Pollock, Kevin G Sugrue, Daniel M Tsang, Carmen Arden, Chris Wyn Davies, David Martin, Anne Celine Sandler, Belinda Gordon, Jason Farooqui, Usman Clifton, David Mallen, Christian Rogers, Jennifer Camm, Alan John Cohen, Alexander T Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title | Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title_full | Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title_fullStr | Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title_short | Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England |
title_sort | identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (pulse-ai) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in england |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillnathanr identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT groveslara identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT dickersoncarissa identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT ochsandreas identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT pangdong identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT lawtonsarah identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT hurstmichael identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT pollockkeving identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT sugruedanielm identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT tsangcarmen identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT ardenchris identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT wyndaviesdavid identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT martinanneceline identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT sandlerbelinda identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT gordonjason identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT farooquiusman identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT cliftondavid identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT mallenchristian identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT rogersjennifer identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT cammalanjohn identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland AT cohenalexandert identificationofundiagnosedatrialfibrillationusingamachinelearningriskpredictionalgorithmanddiagnostictestingpulseaiinprimarycareamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialinengland |