Cargando…

Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study

A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predispo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saarinen, Aino, Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka, Hietala, Jarmo, Dobewall, Henrik, Lavonius, Veikka, Raitakari, Olli, Kähönen, Mika, Sormunen, Elina, Lehtimäki, Terho, Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z
_version_ 1784840966549536768
author Saarinen, Aino
Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka
Hietala, Jarmo
Dobewall, Henrik
Lavonius, Veikka
Raitakari, Olli
Kähönen, Mika
Sormunen, Elina
Lehtimäki, Terho
Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
author_facet Saarinen, Aino
Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka
Hietala, Jarmo
Dobewall, Henrik
Lavonius, Veikka
Raitakari, Olli
Kähönen, Mika
Sormunen, Elina
Lehtimäki, Terho
Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
author_sort Saarinen, Aino
collection PubMed
description A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predisposed to develop milder forms of deviant thinking in terms of magical thinking. Participants came from the population-based Young Finns Study (n = 1292). The polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS) was calculated on the basis of the most recent genome-wide association study (GWAS). Psychiatric diagnoses over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the registry of hospital care. Magical thinking was evaluated with the Spiritual Acceptance Scale (e.g., beliefs in telepathy, miracles, mystical events, or sixth sense) of the Temperament and Character Inventory in 1997, 2001, and 2012 (participants were 20–50-year-olds). We found that, among those who did not develop non-affective psychotic disorders, high PRS predicted higher magical thinking in adulthood (p = 0.001). Further, PRS predicted different developmental courses: a low PRS predicted a steady decrease in magical thinking from age 20 to 50 years, while in individuals with high PRS the decrease in magical thinking ceased in middle age so that their level of magical thinking remained higher than expected for that age. These findings remained when controlling for sex, childhood family environment, and adulthood socioeconomic factors. In conclusion, if high PRS does not lead to a non-affective psychotic disorder, it predicts milder forms of deviant thinking such as elevated magical thinking in adulthood, especially in middle age. The finding enhances our understanding of different outcomes of high genetic psychosis risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9708578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97085782022-12-01 Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study Saarinen, Aino Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka Hietala, Jarmo Dobewall, Henrik Lavonius, Veikka Raitakari, Olli Kähönen, Mika Sormunen, Elina Lehtimäki, Terho Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa Mol Psychiatry Article A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predisposed to develop milder forms of deviant thinking in terms of magical thinking. Participants came from the population-based Young Finns Study (n = 1292). The polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS) was calculated on the basis of the most recent genome-wide association study (GWAS). Psychiatric diagnoses over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the registry of hospital care. Magical thinking was evaluated with the Spiritual Acceptance Scale (e.g., beliefs in telepathy, miracles, mystical events, or sixth sense) of the Temperament and Character Inventory in 1997, 2001, and 2012 (participants were 20–50-year-olds). We found that, among those who did not develop non-affective psychotic disorders, high PRS predicted higher magical thinking in adulthood (p = 0.001). Further, PRS predicted different developmental courses: a low PRS predicted a steady decrease in magical thinking from age 20 to 50 years, while in individuals with high PRS the decrease in magical thinking ceased in middle age so that their level of magical thinking remained higher than expected for that age. These findings remained when controlling for sex, childhood family environment, and adulthood socioeconomic factors. In conclusion, if high PRS does not lead to a non-affective psychotic disorder, it predicts milder forms of deviant thinking such as elevated magical thinking in adulthood, especially in middle age. The finding enhances our understanding of different outcomes of high genetic psychosis risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9708578/ /pubmed/35505089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Saarinen, Aino
Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka
Hietala, Jarmo
Dobewall, Henrik
Lavonius, Veikka
Raitakari, Olli
Kähönen, Mika
Sormunen, Elina
Lehtimäki, Terho
Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title_full Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title_fullStr Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title_full_unstemmed Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title_short Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
title_sort magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z
work_keys_str_mv AT saarinenaino magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT lyytikainenleopekka magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT hietalajarmo magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT dobewallhenrik magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT lavoniusveikka magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT raitakariolli magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT kahonenmika magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT sormunenelina magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT lehtimakiterho magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy
AT keltikangasjarvinenliisa magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy