Cargando…
Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study
A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predispo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z |
_version_ | 1784840966549536768 |
---|---|
author | Saarinen, Aino Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka Hietala, Jarmo Dobewall, Henrik Lavonius, Veikka Raitakari, Olli Kähönen, Mika Sormunen, Elina Lehtimäki, Terho Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa |
author_facet | Saarinen, Aino Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka Hietala, Jarmo Dobewall, Henrik Lavonius, Veikka Raitakari, Olli Kähönen, Mika Sormunen, Elina Lehtimäki, Terho Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa |
author_sort | Saarinen, Aino |
collection | PubMed |
description | A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predisposed to develop milder forms of deviant thinking in terms of magical thinking. Participants came from the population-based Young Finns Study (n = 1292). The polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS) was calculated on the basis of the most recent genome-wide association study (GWAS). Psychiatric diagnoses over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the registry of hospital care. Magical thinking was evaluated with the Spiritual Acceptance Scale (e.g., beliefs in telepathy, miracles, mystical events, or sixth sense) of the Temperament and Character Inventory in 1997, 2001, and 2012 (participants were 20–50-year-olds). We found that, among those who did not develop non-affective psychotic disorders, high PRS predicted higher magical thinking in adulthood (p = 0.001). Further, PRS predicted different developmental courses: a low PRS predicted a steady decrease in magical thinking from age 20 to 50 years, while in individuals with high PRS the decrease in magical thinking ceased in middle age so that their level of magical thinking remained higher than expected for that age. These findings remained when controlling for sex, childhood family environment, and adulthood socioeconomic factors. In conclusion, if high PRS does not lead to a non-affective psychotic disorder, it predicts milder forms of deviant thinking such as elevated magical thinking in adulthood, especially in middle age. The finding enhances our understanding of different outcomes of high genetic psychosis risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9708578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97085782022-12-01 Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study Saarinen, Aino Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka Hietala, Jarmo Dobewall, Henrik Lavonius, Veikka Raitakari, Olli Kähönen, Mika Sormunen, Elina Lehtimäki, Terho Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa Mol Psychiatry Article A strong genetic background for psychoses is well-established. Most individuals with a high genetic risk for schizophrenia, however, do not develop the disorder. We investigated whether individuals, who have a high genetic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychotic disorders, are predisposed to develop milder forms of deviant thinking in terms of magical thinking. Participants came from the population-based Young Finns Study (n = 1292). The polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS) was calculated on the basis of the most recent genome-wide association study (GWAS). Psychiatric diagnoses over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the registry of hospital care. Magical thinking was evaluated with the Spiritual Acceptance Scale (e.g., beliefs in telepathy, miracles, mystical events, or sixth sense) of the Temperament and Character Inventory in 1997, 2001, and 2012 (participants were 20–50-year-olds). We found that, among those who did not develop non-affective psychotic disorders, high PRS predicted higher magical thinking in adulthood (p = 0.001). Further, PRS predicted different developmental courses: a low PRS predicted a steady decrease in magical thinking from age 20 to 50 years, while in individuals with high PRS the decrease in magical thinking ceased in middle age so that their level of magical thinking remained higher than expected for that age. These findings remained when controlling for sex, childhood family environment, and adulthood socioeconomic factors. In conclusion, if high PRS does not lead to a non-affective psychotic disorder, it predicts milder forms of deviant thinking such as elevated magical thinking in adulthood, especially in middle age. The finding enhances our understanding of different outcomes of high genetic psychosis risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9708578/ /pubmed/35505089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Saarinen, Aino Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka Hietala, Jarmo Dobewall, Henrik Lavonius, Veikka Raitakari, Olli Kähönen, Mika Sormunen, Elina Lehtimäki, Terho Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title | Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title_full | Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title_fullStr | Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title_full_unstemmed | Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title_short | Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
title_sort | magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses—a general population study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01581-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saarinenaino magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT lyytikainenleopekka magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT hietalajarmo magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT dobewallhenrik magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT lavoniusveikka magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT raitakariolli magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT kahonenmika magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT sormunenelina magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT lehtimakiterho magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy AT keltikangasjarvinenliisa magicalthinkinginindividualswithhighpolygenicriskforschizophreniabutnononaffectivepsychosesageneralpopulationstudy |