Cargando…

The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study

AIMS: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer radiotherapy services is largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the resultant contingency plans on radiotherapy cancer services in Scotland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed data of radiotherapy activity at ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grocutt, L., Rutherford, A., Caldwell, D., Wilkinson, C., Chalmers, A.J., Dempsey, L., Kelly, C., O'Cathail, S.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.018
_version_ 1784840974810218496
author Grocutt, L.
Rutherford, A.
Caldwell, D.
Wilkinson, C.
Chalmers, A.J.
Dempsey, L.
Kelly, C.
O'Cathail, S.M.
author_facet Grocutt, L.
Rutherford, A.
Caldwell, D.
Wilkinson, C.
Chalmers, A.J.
Dempsey, L.
Kelly, C.
O'Cathail, S.M.
author_sort Grocutt, L.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer radiotherapy services is largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the resultant contingency plans on radiotherapy cancer services in Scotland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed data of radiotherapy activity at our centre were collected from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2021. Differences in mean weekly radiotherapy courses, dose and fractionation patterns and treatment intent were compared with corresponding pre-pandemic months for all treatment sites. Qualitative data were collected for a subgroup of radical radiotherapy patients. RESULTS: Total radiotherapy courses decreased from 6968 to 6240 (–10%) compared with the previous year, prior to the pandemic. Average weekly radiotherapy courses delivered were 134 (standard deviation ±13), decreasing by 10% to 120 (standard deviation 15) (Welch's t-test, P < 0.001). The greatest decrease in new start treatment courses was observed from May to August 2020 (–7.7%, –24.0%, –16.7% and –18.7%) compared with the corresponding months in 2019. A significant reduction was seen for female patients <70 years (–16%) compared with females >70 years (–8%) or their male counterparts (–7% and –6%, respectively). By diagnosis, the largest reductions between pre- and post-pandemic levels were for anal (–26%), breast (–18%) and prostate (–14%) cancer. Contrarily, a significant increase was found for bladder (28%) and oesophageal (11%) cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, radiotherapy activity significantly decreased compared with the 12 months prior. Due to issued guidance, the use of hypofractionated regimens increased, contributing to the reduction in treatments for some tumour sites. An increase in other tumour sites can probably be attributed to the reduction or cancellation of surgical interventions. These results will inform our understanding of the indirect consequences of the pandemic on radiotherapy services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9708615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97086152022-11-30 The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study Grocutt, L. Rutherford, A. Caldwell, D. Wilkinson, C. Chalmers, A.J. Dempsey, L. Kelly, C. O'Cathail, S.M. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Original Article AIMS: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer radiotherapy services is largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the resultant contingency plans on radiotherapy cancer services in Scotland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed data of radiotherapy activity at our centre were collected from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2021. Differences in mean weekly radiotherapy courses, dose and fractionation patterns and treatment intent were compared with corresponding pre-pandemic months for all treatment sites. Qualitative data were collected for a subgroup of radical radiotherapy patients. RESULTS: Total radiotherapy courses decreased from 6968 to 6240 (–10%) compared with the previous year, prior to the pandemic. Average weekly radiotherapy courses delivered were 134 (standard deviation ±13), decreasing by 10% to 120 (standard deviation 15) (Welch's t-test, P < 0.001). The greatest decrease in new start treatment courses was observed from May to August 2020 (–7.7%, –24.0%, –16.7% and –18.7%) compared with the corresponding months in 2019. A significant reduction was seen for female patients <70 years (–16%) compared with females >70 years (–8%) or their male counterparts (–7% and –6%, respectively). By diagnosis, the largest reductions between pre- and post-pandemic levels were for anal (–26%), breast (–18%) and prostate (–14%) cancer. Contrarily, a significant increase was found for bladder (28%) and oesophageal (11%) cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, radiotherapy activity significantly decreased compared with the 12 months prior. Due to issued guidance, the use of hypofractionated regimens increased, contributing to the reduction in treatments for some tumour sites. An increase in other tumour sites can probably be attributed to the reduction or cancellation of surgical interventions. These results will inform our understanding of the indirect consequences of the pandemic on radiotherapy services. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. 2023-02 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9708615/ /pubmed/36528474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.018 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Grocutt, L.
Rutherford, A.
Caldwell, D.
Wilkinson, C.
Chalmers, A.J.
Dempsey, L.
Kelly, C.
O'Cathail, S.M.
The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title_full The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title_fullStr The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title_short The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiotherapy Services in Scotland, UK: A Population-based Study
title_sort impact of covid-19 on radiotherapy services in scotland, uk: a population-based study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.018
work_keys_str_mv AT grocuttl theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT rutherforda theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT caldwelld theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT wilkinsonc theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT chalmersaj theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT dempseyl theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT kellyc theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT ocathailsm theimpactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT grocuttl impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT rutherforda impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT caldwelld impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT wilkinsonc impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT chalmersaj impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT dempseyl impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT kellyc impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy
AT ocathailsm impactofcovid19onradiotherapyservicesinscotlandukapopulationbasedstudy