Cargando…
Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the esthetic perception of selected canine features, namely crown length, shade, inclination, and angle of incisal edge tip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anterior maxillary teeth of a Central European woman were photographed and digitally modified in ord...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04651-2 |
_version_ | 1784841010594971648 |
---|---|
author | Schwefer, Niklas Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Meyer, Gunnar Kern, Matthias |
author_facet | Schwefer, Niklas Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Meyer, Gunnar Kern, Matthias |
author_sort | Schwefer, Niklas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the esthetic perception of selected canine features, namely crown length, shade, inclination, and angle of incisal edge tip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anterior maxillary teeth of a Central European woman were photographed and digitally modified in order to investigate esthetic perceptions of the above four categories. Three groups of examiners with different levels of experience in the field of dentistry (laypersons/inexperienced dental students, advanced dental students, dentists) evaluated the photographs twice with the help of visual analogue scales. RESULTS: The best-evaluated canines have approximately the same length as the central incisor, have the same shade as the other anterior teeth, are best embedded in a lighter overall tooth shade, are neutral to slightly palatal inclined, and have a right angled to rounded incisal edge (≥ 90°). The canines evaluated as least esthetic, however, are longer than the central incisors, darker, inclined labially, and have a tapered incisal edge. No significant differences could be found between the evaluations of the groups with regard to the four feature categories. CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons, advanced dental students, and dentists generally evaluate according to the same esthetic standards. Gender does not have a significant influence on evaluation. Clear definitions of esthetically favored shades, incisal edge shapes, inclination, and lengths of the canines can be given. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Since the esthetics of the smile line play a critical role for patients, dentists, dental technicians, and their supplying industry, knowledge of the esthetically preferred morphology of canines is essential. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The aim of this study is to give clear definitions of esthetically favored shades, incisal edge shapes, and lengths of the canines, as the esthetics of the smile line play a critical role for patients, dentists, dental technicians, and their supplying industry (e.g., denture tooth manufacturers). Precise knowledge of esthetic preferences is important in clinical practice for both dentists and dental technicians, for example, in order to adequately advise patients regarding esthetic corrections. Also, in the case of missing teeth, this knowledge is essential for optimal and satisfactory restorations. Thus, this study can contribute to the satisfaction of general practitioners and patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9708766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97087662022-12-01 Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters Schwefer, Niklas Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Meyer, Gunnar Kern, Matthias Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the esthetic perception of selected canine features, namely crown length, shade, inclination, and angle of incisal edge tip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anterior maxillary teeth of a Central European woman were photographed and digitally modified in order to investigate esthetic perceptions of the above four categories. Three groups of examiners with different levels of experience in the field of dentistry (laypersons/inexperienced dental students, advanced dental students, dentists) evaluated the photographs twice with the help of visual analogue scales. RESULTS: The best-evaluated canines have approximately the same length as the central incisor, have the same shade as the other anterior teeth, are best embedded in a lighter overall tooth shade, are neutral to slightly palatal inclined, and have a right angled to rounded incisal edge (≥ 90°). The canines evaluated as least esthetic, however, are longer than the central incisors, darker, inclined labially, and have a tapered incisal edge. No significant differences could be found between the evaluations of the groups with regard to the four feature categories. CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons, advanced dental students, and dentists generally evaluate according to the same esthetic standards. Gender does not have a significant influence on evaluation. Clear definitions of esthetically favored shades, incisal edge shapes, inclination, and lengths of the canines can be given. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Since the esthetics of the smile line play a critical role for patients, dentists, dental technicians, and their supplying industry, knowledge of the esthetically preferred morphology of canines is essential. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The aim of this study is to give clear definitions of esthetically favored shades, incisal edge shapes, and lengths of the canines, as the esthetics of the smile line play a critical role for patients, dentists, dental technicians, and their supplying industry (e.g., denture tooth manufacturers). Precise knowledge of esthetic preferences is important in clinical practice for both dentists and dental technicians, for example, in order to adequately advise patients regarding esthetic corrections. Also, in the case of missing teeth, this knowledge is essential for optimal and satisfactory restorations. Thus, this study can contribute to the satisfaction of general practitioners and patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9708766/ /pubmed/35906341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04651-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schwefer, Niklas Freitag-Wolf, Sandra Meyer, Gunnar Kern, Matthias Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title | Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title_full | Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title_fullStr | Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title_short | Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
title_sort | investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04651-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schweferniklas investigationoftheestheticperceptionofdifferentcanineparameters AT freitagwolfsandra investigationoftheestheticperceptionofdifferentcanineparameters AT meyergunnar investigationoftheestheticperceptionofdifferentcanineparameters AT kernmatthias investigationoftheestheticperceptionofdifferentcanineparameters |