Diagnostic value of regional myocardial flow reserve measurements using Rubidium-82 PET: Disclosures none

PURPOSE: Visual assessment of Rubidium (Rb-82) PET myocardial perfusion images is usually combined with global myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurements. However, small regional blood flow deficits may go unnoticed. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic value of regional with global MFR in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD). METHODS: We retrospectively included 1519 patients referred for rest and regadenoson-induced stress Rb-82 PET/CT without prior history of oCAD. MFR was determined globally, per vessel territory and per myocardial segment and compared using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Vessel MFR was defined as the lowest MFR of the coronary territories and segmental MFR as the lowest MFR of the 17-segments. The primary endpoint was oCAD on invasive coronary angiography. RESULTS: The 148 patients classified as having oCAD had a lower global MFR (median 1.9, interquartile range [1.5–2.4] vs. 2.4 [2.0–2.9]), lower vessel MFR (1.6 [1.2–2.1] vs. 2.2 [1.9–2.6]) and lower segmental MFR (1.3 [ 0.9–1.6] vs. 1.8 [1.5–2.2]) as compared to the non-oCAD patients (p < 0.001). The area under the curve for segmental MFR (0.81) was larger (p ≤ 0.005) than of global MFR (0.74) and vessel MFR (0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The use of regional MFR instead of global MFR is recommended as it improves the diagnostic value of Rb-82 PET in the detection of oCAD.