Cargando…

Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas

Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole mai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Fei, Guo, Shuqing, Wei, Song, Guo, Ru, Cai, Tie, Zhang, Peng, Jia, Zhikuan, Hussain, Sadam, Javed, Talha, Chen, XiaoLi, Ren, Xiaolong, Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid, Stępień, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631
_version_ 1784841044706197504
author Han, Fei
Guo, Shuqing
Wei, Song
Guo, Ru
Cai, Tie
Zhang, Peng
Jia, Zhikuan
Hussain, Sadam
Javed, Talha
Chen, XiaoLi
Ren, Xiaolong
Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid
Stępień, Piotr
author_facet Han, Fei
Guo, Shuqing
Wei, Song
Guo, Ru
Cai, Tie
Zhang, Peng
Jia, Zhikuan
Hussain, Sadam
Javed, Talha
Chen, XiaoLi
Ren, Xiaolong
Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid
Stępień, Piotr
author_sort Han, Fei
collection PubMed
description Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole maize, sole peanut, maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping, 20% and 40% N reductions for maize in the maize–peanut rotation–intercropping. Maize–peanut intercropping had no land-use advantage. Intercropped peanut is limited in carboxylation rates and electron transport rate (ETR), leading to a decrease in hundred-grain weight (HGW) and an increase in blighted pods number per plant (N(BP)). Intercropped peanut adapts to light stress by decreasing light saturation point (I(sat)) and light compensation point (I(comp)) and increasing the electron transport efficiency. Intercropped maize showed an increase in maximum photosynthetic rate (Pn(max)) and I(comp) due to a combination of improved intercellular CO(2) concentration, carboxylation rates, PSII photochemical quantum efficiency, and ETR. Compare to maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping alleviated the continuous crop barriers of intercropped border row peanut by improving carboxylation rates, electron transport efficiency and decreasing I(sat), thereby increasing its HGW and N(BP). More importantly, the land equivalent ratio of maize–peanut rotation–intercropping in the second and third planting years were 1.05 and 1.07, respectively, showing obvious land use advantages. A 20% N reduction for maize in maize–peanut rotation–intercropping does not affect photosynthetic character and yield for intercropped crops. However, a 40% N reduction decreased significantly the carboxylation rates, ETR, I(comp) and Pn(max) of intercropped maize, thereby reducing in a 14.83% HGW and 5.75% lower grain number per spike, and making land-use efficiency negative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9708908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97089082022-12-01 Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas Han, Fei Guo, Shuqing Wei, Song Guo, Ru Cai, Tie Zhang, Peng Jia, Zhikuan Hussain, Sadam Javed, Talha Chen, XiaoLi Ren, Xiaolong Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid Stępień, Piotr Front Plant Sci Plant Science Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole maize, sole peanut, maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping, 20% and 40% N reductions for maize in the maize–peanut rotation–intercropping. Maize–peanut intercropping had no land-use advantage. Intercropped peanut is limited in carboxylation rates and electron transport rate (ETR), leading to a decrease in hundred-grain weight (HGW) and an increase in blighted pods number per plant (N(BP)). Intercropped peanut adapts to light stress by decreasing light saturation point (I(sat)) and light compensation point (I(comp)) and increasing the electron transport efficiency. Intercropped maize showed an increase in maximum photosynthetic rate (Pn(max)) and I(comp) due to a combination of improved intercellular CO(2) concentration, carboxylation rates, PSII photochemical quantum efficiency, and ETR. Compare to maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping alleviated the continuous crop barriers of intercropped border row peanut by improving carboxylation rates, electron transport efficiency and decreasing I(sat), thereby increasing its HGW and N(BP). More importantly, the land equivalent ratio of maize–peanut rotation–intercropping in the second and third planting years were 1.05 and 1.07, respectively, showing obvious land use advantages. A 20% N reduction for maize in maize–peanut rotation–intercropping does not affect photosynthetic character and yield for intercropped crops. However, a 40% N reduction decreased significantly the carboxylation rates, ETR, I(comp) and Pn(max) of intercropped maize, thereby reducing in a 14.83% HGW and 5.75% lower grain number per spike, and making land-use efficiency negative. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9708908/ /pubmed/36466232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631 Text en Copyright © 2022 Han, Guo, Wei, Guo, Cai, Zhang, Jia, Hussain, Javed, Chen, Ren, Al-Sadoon and Stępień https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Han, Fei
Guo, Shuqing
Wei, Song
Guo, Ru
Cai, Tie
Zhang, Peng
Jia, Zhikuan
Hussain, Sadam
Javed, Talha
Chen, XiaoLi
Ren, Xiaolong
Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid
Stępień, Piotr
Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title_full Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title_fullStr Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title_full_unstemmed Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title_short Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
title_sort photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631
work_keys_str_mv AT hanfei photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT guoshuqing photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT weisong photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT guoru photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT caitie photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT zhangpeng photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT jiazhikuan photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT hussainsadam photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT javedtalha photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT chenxiaoli photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT renxiaolong photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT alsadoonmohammadkhalid photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas
AT stepienpiotr photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas