Cargando…
Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas
Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole mai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631 |
_version_ | 1784841044706197504 |
---|---|
author | Han, Fei Guo, Shuqing Wei, Song Guo, Ru Cai, Tie Zhang, Peng Jia, Zhikuan Hussain, Sadam Javed, Talha Chen, XiaoLi Ren, Xiaolong Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid Stępień, Piotr |
author_facet | Han, Fei Guo, Shuqing Wei, Song Guo, Ru Cai, Tie Zhang, Peng Jia, Zhikuan Hussain, Sadam Javed, Talha Chen, XiaoLi Ren, Xiaolong Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid Stępień, Piotr |
author_sort | Han, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole maize, sole peanut, maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping, 20% and 40% N reductions for maize in the maize–peanut rotation–intercropping. Maize–peanut intercropping had no land-use advantage. Intercropped peanut is limited in carboxylation rates and electron transport rate (ETR), leading to a decrease in hundred-grain weight (HGW) and an increase in blighted pods number per plant (N(BP)). Intercropped peanut adapts to light stress by decreasing light saturation point (I(sat)) and light compensation point (I(comp)) and increasing the electron transport efficiency. Intercropped maize showed an increase in maximum photosynthetic rate (Pn(max)) and I(comp) due to a combination of improved intercellular CO(2) concentration, carboxylation rates, PSII photochemical quantum efficiency, and ETR. Compare to maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping alleviated the continuous crop barriers of intercropped border row peanut by improving carboxylation rates, electron transport efficiency and decreasing I(sat), thereby increasing its HGW and N(BP). More importantly, the land equivalent ratio of maize–peanut rotation–intercropping in the second and third planting years were 1.05 and 1.07, respectively, showing obvious land use advantages. A 20% N reduction for maize in maize–peanut rotation–intercropping does not affect photosynthetic character and yield for intercropped crops. However, a 40% N reduction decreased significantly the carboxylation rates, ETR, I(comp) and Pn(max) of intercropped maize, thereby reducing in a 14.83% HGW and 5.75% lower grain number per spike, and making land-use efficiency negative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9708908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97089082022-12-01 Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas Han, Fei Guo, Shuqing Wei, Song Guo, Ru Cai, Tie Zhang, Peng Jia, Zhikuan Hussain, Sadam Javed, Talha Chen, XiaoLi Ren, Xiaolong Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid Stępień, Piotr Front Plant Sci Plant Science Improving cropping systems together with suitable agronomic management practices can maintain dry farming productivity and reduce water competition with low N inputs. The objective of the study was to determine the photosynthetic and yield responses of maize and peanut under six treatments: sole maize, sole peanut, maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping, 20% and 40% N reductions for maize in the maize–peanut rotation–intercropping. Maize–peanut intercropping had no land-use advantage. Intercropped peanut is limited in carboxylation rates and electron transport rate (ETR), leading to a decrease in hundred-grain weight (HGW) and an increase in blighted pods number per plant (N(BP)). Intercropped peanut adapts to light stress by decreasing light saturation point (I(sat)) and light compensation point (I(comp)) and increasing the electron transport efficiency. Intercropped maize showed an increase in maximum photosynthetic rate (Pn(max)) and I(comp) due to a combination of improved intercellular CO(2) concentration, carboxylation rates, PSII photochemical quantum efficiency, and ETR. Compare to maize–peanut intercropping, maize–peanut rotation–intercropping alleviated the continuous crop barriers of intercropped border row peanut by improving carboxylation rates, electron transport efficiency and decreasing I(sat), thereby increasing its HGW and N(BP). More importantly, the land equivalent ratio of maize–peanut rotation–intercropping in the second and third planting years were 1.05 and 1.07, respectively, showing obvious land use advantages. A 20% N reduction for maize in maize–peanut rotation–intercropping does not affect photosynthetic character and yield for intercropped crops. However, a 40% N reduction decreased significantly the carboxylation rates, ETR, I(comp) and Pn(max) of intercropped maize, thereby reducing in a 14.83% HGW and 5.75% lower grain number per spike, and making land-use efficiency negative. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9708908/ /pubmed/36466232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631 Text en Copyright © 2022 Han, Guo, Wei, Guo, Cai, Zhang, Jia, Hussain, Javed, Chen, Ren, Al-Sadoon and Stępień https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Han, Fei Guo, Shuqing Wei, Song Guo, Ru Cai, Tie Zhang, Peng Jia, Zhikuan Hussain, Sadam Javed, Talha Chen, XiaoLi Ren, Xiaolong Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid Stępień, Piotr Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title | Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title_full | Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title_fullStr | Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title_full_unstemmed | Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title_short | Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
title_sort | photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize–peanut intercropping in dry farming areas |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanfei photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT guoshuqing photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT weisong photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT guoru photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT caitie photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT zhangpeng photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT jiazhikuan photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT hussainsadam photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT javedtalha photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT chenxiaoli photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT renxiaolong photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT alsadoonmohammadkhalid photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas AT stepienpiotr photosyntheticandyieldresponsesofrotatingplantingstripsandreducingnitrogenfertilizerapplicationinmaizepeanutintercroppingindryfarmingareas |