Cargando…

Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hempel, Susanne, Bolshakova, Maria, Turner, Barbara J., Dinalo, Jennifer, Rose, Danielle, Motala, Aneesa, Fu, Ning, Clemesha, Chase G., Rubenstein, Lisa, Stockdale, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5
_version_ 1784841051178008576
author Hempel, Susanne
Bolshakova, Maria
Turner, Barbara J.
Dinalo, Jennifer
Rose, Danielle
Motala, Aneesa
Fu, Ning
Clemesha, Chase G.
Rubenstein, Lisa
Stockdale, Susan
author_facet Hempel, Susanne
Bolshakova, Maria
Turner, Barbara J.
Dinalo, Jennifer
Rose, Danielle
Motala, Aneesa
Fu, Ning
Clemesha, Chase G.
Rubenstein, Lisa
Stockdale, Susan
author_sort Hempel, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence review (termed evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)) may provide a basis for further methodological development. METHODS: In this scoping review (registration: https://osf.io/hr5bj) of EBQI, we searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. The review addressed three central questions: How is EBQI defined? How is evidence used to inform evidence-informed QI initiatives? What is the effectiveness of EBQI? RESULTS: We identified 211 publications meeting inclusion criteria. In total, 170 publications explicitly used the term “EBQI.” Published definitions emphasized relying on evidence throughout the QI process. We reviewed a subset of 67 evaluations of QI initiatives in primary care, including both studies that used the term “EBQI” with those that described an evidence-based initiative without using EBQI terminology. The most frequently reported EBQI components included use of evidence to identify previously tested effective QI interventions; engaging stakeholders; iterative intervention development; partnering with frontline clinicians; and data-driven evaluation of the QI intervention. Effectiveness estimates were positive but varied in size in ten studies that provided data on patient health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EBQI is a promising strategy for integrating relevant prior scientific findings and methods systematically in the QI process, from the initial developmental phase of the IQ initiative through to its evaluation. Future QI researchers and practitioners can use these findings as the basis for further development of QI initiatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9708973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97089732022-12-01 Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature Hempel, Susanne Bolshakova, Maria Turner, Barbara J. Dinalo, Jennifer Rose, Danielle Motala, Aneesa Fu, Ning Clemesha, Chase G. Rubenstein, Lisa Stockdale, Susan J Gen Intern Med Review BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence review (termed evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)) may provide a basis for further methodological development. METHODS: In this scoping review (registration: https://osf.io/hr5bj) of EBQI, we searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. The review addressed three central questions: How is EBQI defined? How is evidence used to inform evidence-informed QI initiatives? What is the effectiveness of EBQI? RESULTS: We identified 211 publications meeting inclusion criteria. In total, 170 publications explicitly used the term “EBQI.” Published definitions emphasized relying on evidence throughout the QI process. We reviewed a subset of 67 evaluations of QI initiatives in primary care, including both studies that used the term “EBQI” with those that described an evidence-based initiative without using EBQI terminology. The most frequently reported EBQI components included use of evidence to identify previously tested effective QI interventions; engaging stakeholders; iterative intervention development; partnering with frontline clinicians; and data-driven evaluation of the QI intervention. Effectiveness estimates were positive but varied in size in ten studies that provided data on patient health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EBQI is a promising strategy for integrating relevant prior scientific findings and methods systematically in the QI process, from the initial developmental phase of the IQ initiative through to its evaluation. Future QI researchers and practitioners can use these findings as the basis for further development of QI initiatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-29 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9708973/ /pubmed/36175760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review
Hempel, Susanne
Bolshakova, Maria
Turner, Barbara J.
Dinalo, Jennifer
Rose, Danielle
Motala, Aneesa
Fu, Ning
Clemesha, Chase G.
Rubenstein, Lisa
Stockdale, Susan
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title_full Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title_short Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
title_sort evidence-based quality improvement: a scoping review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hempelsusanne evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT bolshakovamaria evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT turnerbarbaraj evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT dinalojennifer evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT rosedanielle evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT motalaaneesa evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT funing evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT clemeshachaseg evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT rubensteinlisa evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT stockdalesusan evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature