Cargando…
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5 |
_version_ | 1784841051178008576 |
---|---|
author | Hempel, Susanne Bolshakova, Maria Turner, Barbara J. Dinalo, Jennifer Rose, Danielle Motala, Aneesa Fu, Ning Clemesha, Chase G. Rubenstein, Lisa Stockdale, Susan |
author_facet | Hempel, Susanne Bolshakova, Maria Turner, Barbara J. Dinalo, Jennifer Rose, Danielle Motala, Aneesa Fu, Ning Clemesha, Chase G. Rubenstein, Lisa Stockdale, Susan |
author_sort | Hempel, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence review (termed evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)) may provide a basis for further methodological development. METHODS: In this scoping review (registration: https://osf.io/hr5bj) of EBQI, we searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. The review addressed three central questions: How is EBQI defined? How is evidence used to inform evidence-informed QI initiatives? What is the effectiveness of EBQI? RESULTS: We identified 211 publications meeting inclusion criteria. In total, 170 publications explicitly used the term “EBQI.” Published definitions emphasized relying on evidence throughout the QI process. We reviewed a subset of 67 evaluations of QI initiatives in primary care, including both studies that used the term “EBQI” with those that described an evidence-based initiative without using EBQI terminology. The most frequently reported EBQI components included use of evidence to identify previously tested effective QI interventions; engaging stakeholders; iterative intervention development; partnering with frontline clinicians; and data-driven evaluation of the QI intervention. Effectiveness estimates were positive but varied in size in ten studies that provided data on patient health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EBQI is a promising strategy for integrating relevant prior scientific findings and methods systematically in the QI process, from the initial developmental phase of the IQ initiative through to its evaluation. Future QI researchers and practitioners can use these findings as the basis for further development of QI initiatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9708973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97089732022-12-01 Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature Hempel, Susanne Bolshakova, Maria Turner, Barbara J. Dinalo, Jennifer Rose, Danielle Motala, Aneesa Fu, Ning Clemesha, Chase G. Rubenstein, Lisa Stockdale, Susan J Gen Intern Med Review BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives often reflect approaches based on anecdotal evidence, but it is unclear how initiatives can best incorporate scientific literature and methods into the QI process. Review of studies of QI initiatives that aim to systematically incorporate evidence review (termed evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)) may provide a basis for further methodological development. METHODS: In this scoping review (registration: https://osf.io/hr5bj) of EBQI, we searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. The review addressed three central questions: How is EBQI defined? How is evidence used to inform evidence-informed QI initiatives? What is the effectiveness of EBQI? RESULTS: We identified 211 publications meeting inclusion criteria. In total, 170 publications explicitly used the term “EBQI.” Published definitions emphasized relying on evidence throughout the QI process. We reviewed a subset of 67 evaluations of QI initiatives in primary care, including both studies that used the term “EBQI” with those that described an evidence-based initiative without using EBQI terminology. The most frequently reported EBQI components included use of evidence to identify previously tested effective QI interventions; engaging stakeholders; iterative intervention development; partnering with frontline clinicians; and data-driven evaluation of the QI intervention. Effectiveness estimates were positive but varied in size in ten studies that provided data on patient health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EBQI is a promising strategy for integrating relevant prior scientific findings and methods systematically in the QI process, from the initial developmental phase of the IQ initiative through to its evaluation. Future QI researchers and practitioners can use these findings as the basis for further development of QI initiatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-29 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9708973/ /pubmed/36175760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Review Hempel, Susanne Bolshakova, Maria Turner, Barbara J. Dinalo, Jennifer Rose, Danielle Motala, Aneesa Fu, Ning Clemesha, Chase G. Rubenstein, Lisa Stockdale, Susan Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title | Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title_full | Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title_short | Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature |
title_sort | evidence-based quality improvement: a scoping review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hempelsusanne evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT bolshakovamaria evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT turnerbarbaraj evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT dinalojennifer evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT rosedanielle evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT motalaaneesa evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT funing evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT clemeshachaseg evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT rubensteinlisa evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature AT stockdalesusan evidencebasedqualityimprovementascopingreviewoftheliterature |