Cargando…

Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are used for pain control after abdominal surgery. Although there have been several meta-analyses comparing these two techniques, the conclusion was limited by a small number of studies and heterogeneity among studies. Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Young Hyun, Jung, Ji-Yoon, Cho, Hyeyeon, Yoon, Hyun-Kyu, Yang, Seong-Mi, Lee, Ho-Jin, Kim, Won Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36446941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25073-w
_version_ 1784841059218489344
author Jeong, Young Hyun
Jung, Ji-Yoon
Cho, Hyeyeon
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
author_facet Jeong, Young Hyun
Jung, Ji-Yoon
Cho, Hyeyeon
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
author_sort Jeong, Young Hyun
collection PubMed
description Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are used for pain control after abdominal surgery. Although there have been several meta-analyses comparing these two techniques, the conclusion was limited by a small number of studies and heterogeneity among studies. Our meta-analysis used the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane central library databases from their inception through September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEA and TAP block were included. The pre-specified primary outcome was the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively. Twenty-two RCTs involving 1975 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively was significantly different between groups favoring TEA group (Mean difference [MD] 0.58, 95% confidence interval CI − 0.01, 1.15, P = 0.04, I(2) = 94%). TEA group significantly reduced the pain score at 48 h at rest (MD 0.59, 95% CI 0.15, 1.03, P = 0.009, I(2) = 86%) and at 48 h at movement (MD 0.53, 95% CI 0.07, 0.99, P = 0.03, I(2) = 76%). However, there was no significant difference at other time points. Time to ambulation was shorter in TAP block but the incidence of hypotension at 24 h and 72 h was significantly lower in TAP block compared to TEA. Trial sequential analysis showed that the required information size has not yet been reached. Our meta-analysis demonstrated there was no significant or clinically meaningful difference in the postoperative pain scores between TEA and TAP block group. Given the insufficient information size revealed by TSA, the high risk of bias of our included studies, and the significant heterogeneity of our meta-analysis results, our results should be interpreted carefully but it is not likely that the addition of further studies could prove any clinically meaningful difference in pain score between these two techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97090472022-12-01 Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Jeong, Young Hyun Jung, Ji-Yoon Cho, Hyeyeon Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Yang, Seong-Mi Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Won Ho Sci Rep Article Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are used for pain control after abdominal surgery. Although there have been several meta-analyses comparing these two techniques, the conclusion was limited by a small number of studies and heterogeneity among studies. Our meta-analysis used the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane central library databases from their inception through September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEA and TAP block were included. The pre-specified primary outcome was the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively. Twenty-two RCTs involving 1975 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively was significantly different between groups favoring TEA group (Mean difference [MD] 0.58, 95% confidence interval CI − 0.01, 1.15, P = 0.04, I(2) = 94%). TEA group significantly reduced the pain score at 48 h at rest (MD 0.59, 95% CI 0.15, 1.03, P = 0.009, I(2) = 86%) and at 48 h at movement (MD 0.53, 95% CI 0.07, 0.99, P = 0.03, I(2) = 76%). However, there was no significant difference at other time points. Time to ambulation was shorter in TAP block but the incidence of hypotension at 24 h and 72 h was significantly lower in TAP block compared to TEA. Trial sequential analysis showed that the required information size has not yet been reached. Our meta-analysis demonstrated there was no significant or clinically meaningful difference in the postoperative pain scores between TEA and TAP block group. Given the insufficient information size revealed by TSA, the high risk of bias of our included studies, and the significant heterogeneity of our meta-analysis results, our results should be interpreted carefully but it is not likely that the addition of further studies could prove any clinically meaningful difference in pain score between these two techniques. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9709047/ /pubmed/36446941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25073-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jeong, Young Hyun
Jung, Ji-Yoon
Cho, Hyeyeon
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_short Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_sort transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36446941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25073-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongyounghyun transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT jungjiyoon transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT chohyeyeon transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yoonhyunkyu transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangseongmi transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT leehojin transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT kimwonho transverseabdominisplaneblockcomparedwithpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiafollowingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis