Cargando…

The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better

INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jia, Liu, Luxin, Wu, Yue, Miao, Benyu, Li, Yubin, Zhou, Canquan, Xu, Yanwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934
_version_ 1784841074580127744
author Huang, Jia
Liu, Luxin
Wu, Yue
Miao, Benyu
Li, Yubin
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
author_facet Huang, Jia
Liu, Luxin
Wu, Yue
Miao, Benyu
Li, Yubin
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
author_sort Huang, Jia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of gonadotropin initiation in the LPS protocol for poor ovarian responders. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 327 poor responders fulfilling Bologna criteria underwent LPS with IVF/ICSI treatment. HMG and letrozole were administrated after ovulation. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the gonadotropin start day: early, early-mid, and mid-late luteal phase. A freeze-all strategy was performed for all cycles. The duration of ovarian stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate after frozen/thawed embryo transfer cycles were included for evaluation. RESULTS: The group accepted ovarian stimulation in the earlier phase tended to have a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation [8 (7,10) in early luteal group, 9 (8,10.25) in early-mid luteal group, and 11 (10,12) in mid-late luteal group; P <0.001] and lower gonadotropin consumption [1993.35 ± 720.31, 2282.73 ± 703.38, and 2764.83 ± 722.26, respectively; P <0.001]. Logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to assess the associations between the phase of gonadotropin initiation and duration of ovarian stimulation (or total gonadotropin dose) by adjusting for confounding factors. Compared with the early luteal group, longer ovarian stimulation(>9 days) was more likely to occur in the early-mid and mid-late luteal groups, with the adjusted odds ratios 0.584 (0.327-1.042) and 0.116 (0.049-0.271), respectively (P-trend<0.001). Delayed gonadotropin initiation showed an 113.200 IU increase (95%CI: 70.469, 155.930) per-day in the total gonadotropin dosage. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the mean number of oocytes, utilizable embryos, pregnancy outcomes among three groups. CONCLUSION: Although the timing of gonadotropin initiation is not associated with pregnancy outcomes, earlier initiation of gonadotropin therapy after ovulation was associated with a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation and lower gonadotropin consumption in poor responders in LPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97091142022-12-01 The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better Huang, Jia Liu, Luxin Wu, Yue Miao, Benyu Li, Yubin Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of gonadotropin initiation in the LPS protocol for poor ovarian responders. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 327 poor responders fulfilling Bologna criteria underwent LPS with IVF/ICSI treatment. HMG and letrozole were administrated after ovulation. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the gonadotropin start day: early, early-mid, and mid-late luteal phase. A freeze-all strategy was performed for all cycles. The duration of ovarian stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate after frozen/thawed embryo transfer cycles were included for evaluation. RESULTS: The group accepted ovarian stimulation in the earlier phase tended to have a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation [8 (7,10) in early luteal group, 9 (8,10.25) in early-mid luteal group, and 11 (10,12) in mid-late luteal group; P <0.001] and lower gonadotropin consumption [1993.35 ± 720.31, 2282.73 ± 703.38, and 2764.83 ± 722.26, respectively; P <0.001]. Logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to assess the associations between the phase of gonadotropin initiation and duration of ovarian stimulation (or total gonadotropin dose) by adjusting for confounding factors. Compared with the early luteal group, longer ovarian stimulation(>9 days) was more likely to occur in the early-mid and mid-late luteal groups, with the adjusted odds ratios 0.584 (0.327-1.042) and 0.116 (0.049-0.271), respectively (P-trend<0.001). Delayed gonadotropin initiation showed an 113.200 IU increase (95%CI: 70.469, 155.930) per-day in the total gonadotropin dosage. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the mean number of oocytes, utilizable embryos, pregnancy outcomes among three groups. CONCLUSION: Although the timing of gonadotropin initiation is not associated with pregnancy outcomes, earlier initiation of gonadotropin therapy after ovulation was associated with a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation and lower gonadotropin consumption in poor responders in LPS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9709114/ /pubmed/36465615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Liu, Wu, Miao, Li, Zhou and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Huang, Jia
Liu, Luxin
Wu, Yue
Miao, Benyu
Li, Yubin
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title_full The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title_fullStr The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title_full_unstemmed The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title_short The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
title_sort earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjia theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT liuluxin theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT wuyue theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT miaobenyu theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT liyubin theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT zhoucanquan theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT xuyanwen theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT huangjia earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT liuluxin earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT wuyue earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT miaobenyu earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT liyubin earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT zhoucanquan earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter
AT xuyanwen earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter