Cargando…
The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better
INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of go...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934 |
_version_ | 1784841074580127744 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jia Liu, Luxin Wu, Yue Miao, Benyu Li, Yubin Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen |
author_facet | Huang, Jia Liu, Luxin Wu, Yue Miao, Benyu Li, Yubin Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen |
author_sort | Huang, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of gonadotropin initiation in the LPS protocol for poor ovarian responders. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 327 poor responders fulfilling Bologna criteria underwent LPS with IVF/ICSI treatment. HMG and letrozole were administrated after ovulation. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the gonadotropin start day: early, early-mid, and mid-late luteal phase. A freeze-all strategy was performed for all cycles. The duration of ovarian stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate after frozen/thawed embryo transfer cycles were included for evaluation. RESULTS: The group accepted ovarian stimulation in the earlier phase tended to have a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation [8 (7,10) in early luteal group, 9 (8,10.25) in early-mid luteal group, and 11 (10,12) in mid-late luteal group; P <0.001] and lower gonadotropin consumption [1993.35 ± 720.31, 2282.73 ± 703.38, and 2764.83 ± 722.26, respectively; P <0.001]. Logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to assess the associations between the phase of gonadotropin initiation and duration of ovarian stimulation (or total gonadotropin dose) by adjusting for confounding factors. Compared with the early luteal group, longer ovarian stimulation(>9 days) was more likely to occur in the early-mid and mid-late luteal groups, with the adjusted odds ratios 0.584 (0.327-1.042) and 0.116 (0.049-0.271), respectively (P-trend<0.001). Delayed gonadotropin initiation showed an 113.200 IU increase (95%CI: 70.469, 155.930) per-day in the total gonadotropin dosage. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the mean number of oocytes, utilizable embryos, pregnancy outcomes among three groups. CONCLUSION: Although the timing of gonadotropin initiation is not associated with pregnancy outcomes, earlier initiation of gonadotropin therapy after ovulation was associated with a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation and lower gonadotropin consumption in poor responders in LPS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9709114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97091142022-12-01 The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better Huang, Jia Liu, Luxin Wu, Yue Miao, Benyu Li, Yubin Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation has been proved to be feasible for producing competent oocytes/embryos and achieving live births, yet there is no standardized stimulation protocol for luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPS). The aim of this study was to explore the optimal timing of gonadotropin initiation in the LPS protocol for poor ovarian responders. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 327 poor responders fulfilling Bologna criteria underwent LPS with IVF/ICSI treatment. HMG and letrozole were administrated after ovulation. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the gonadotropin start day: early, early-mid, and mid-late luteal phase. A freeze-all strategy was performed for all cycles. The duration of ovarian stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate after frozen/thawed embryo transfer cycles were included for evaluation. RESULTS: The group accepted ovarian stimulation in the earlier phase tended to have a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation [8 (7,10) in early luteal group, 9 (8,10.25) in early-mid luteal group, and 11 (10,12) in mid-late luteal group; P <0.001] and lower gonadotropin consumption [1993.35 ± 720.31, 2282.73 ± 703.38, and 2764.83 ± 722.26, respectively; P <0.001]. Logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to assess the associations between the phase of gonadotropin initiation and duration of ovarian stimulation (or total gonadotropin dose) by adjusting for confounding factors. Compared with the early luteal group, longer ovarian stimulation(>9 days) was more likely to occur in the early-mid and mid-late luteal groups, with the adjusted odds ratios 0.584 (0.327-1.042) and 0.116 (0.049-0.271), respectively (P-trend<0.001). Delayed gonadotropin initiation showed an 113.200 IU increase (95%CI: 70.469, 155.930) per-day in the total gonadotropin dosage. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the mean number of oocytes, utilizable embryos, pregnancy outcomes among three groups. CONCLUSION: Although the timing of gonadotropin initiation is not associated with pregnancy outcomes, earlier initiation of gonadotropin therapy after ovulation was associated with a shorter duration of ovarian stimulation and lower gonadotropin consumption in poor responders in LPS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9709114/ /pubmed/36465615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Liu, Wu, Miao, Li, Zhou and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Huang, Jia Liu, Luxin Wu, Yue Miao, Benyu Li, Yubin Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title | The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title_full | The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title_fullStr | The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title_full_unstemmed | The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title_short | The earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
title_sort | earlier the initiation of gonadotropin in poor responders in luteal phase stimulation protocols, the better |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjia theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT liuluxin theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT wuyue theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT miaobenyu theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT liyubin theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT zhoucanquan theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT xuyanwen theearliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT huangjia earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT liuluxin earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT wuyue earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT miaobenyu earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT liyubin earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT zhoucanquan earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter AT xuyanwen earliertheinitiationofgonadotropininpoorrespondersinlutealphasestimulationprotocolsthebetter |