Cargando…

Criterion and construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) to measure depression in patients with cancer: The contribution of somatic items

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Screening for depression in patients with cancer can be difficult due to overlap between symptoms of depression and cancer. We assessed validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in this population. METHOD: Data was obtained in an outpatient neuropsychiatry unit treatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Sílvia, Camacho, Marta, Barahona-Corrêa, J. Bernardo, Oliveira, José, Lemos, Raquel, da Silva, Daniel Rodrigues, da Silva, Joaquim Alves, Baptista, Telmo Mourinho, Grácio, Jaime, Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100350
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Screening for depression in patients with cancer can be difficult due to overlap between symptoms of depression and cancer. We assessed validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in this population. METHOD: Data was obtained in an outpatient neuropsychiatry unit treating patients with and without cancer. Psychometric properties of the BDI-II Portuguese version were assessed separately in 202 patients with cancer, and 376 outpatients with mental health complaints but without cancer. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a three-factor structure model (cognitive, affective and somatic) provided best fit to data in both samples. Criterion validity was good for detecting depression in oncological patients, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.91). A cut-off score of 14 had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 73%. Excluding somatic items did not significantly change the ROC curve for BDI-II (difference AUCs = 0.002, p=0.9). A good criterion validity for BDI-II was also obtained in the non-oncological population (AUC = 0.87; 95% CI 0.81–0.91), with a cut-off of 18 (sensitivity=84%; specificity=73%). CONCLUSIONS: The BDI-II demonstrated good psychometric properties in patients with cancer, comparable to a population without cancer. Exclusion of somatic items did not affect screening accuracy.