Cargando…

The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game

The first game-based treatment for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020. This game was developed for use at home as part of everyday training and can be used along with one’s usual training plan. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanuki, Fumiya, Nakphu, Nonthaporn, Tahara, Ayumi, Iramina, Keiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.1044071
_version_ 1784841114886340608
author Sanuki, Fumiya
Nakphu, Nonthaporn
Tahara, Ayumi
Iramina, Keiji
author_facet Sanuki, Fumiya
Nakphu, Nonthaporn
Tahara, Ayumi
Iramina, Keiji
author_sort Sanuki, Fumiya
collection PubMed
description The first game-based treatment for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020. This game was developed for use at home as part of everyday training and can be used along with one’s usual training plan. In this game, two tasks are performed in parallel: (1) a perceptual discrimination targeting task (response and not response and avoiding responding to sudden pop-up targets) and (2) a sensory-motor navigation task (players continuously adjust their location to interact with or avoid positional targets). However, the brain activity of people playing this game was not examined, and the immersive environment (3D virtual world) was not considered. Therefore, we aimed to develop a system to investigate brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) during multitask gameplay in virtual reality (VR). In this experiment, we focused on the difference between the success and failure of the Go/No-Go task in a multitask game. We created a color discrimination task and a target tracking task in VR. The content of this game task was designed using previous multitask training. EEG and event data were recorded. Using event data, we can analyze the data in detail. We divided the trial types (Go and No-Go) and results (success and failure). We then compared the success and failure of each task. In the Go trial, the relative theta power in success at Fz was significantly higher than that of failure. However, no difference in power was observed in the No-Go trial. On the other hand, theta power was no different between success and failure in the other task. These results of the Go trial suggest that the participants were attentive to processing both tasks. Thus, it is possible that theta power in the frontal area 1 s before stimulation could predict the success or failure of the Go trial. On the other hand, the results of the No-Go trial may be due to the low number of No-Go failure trials and the fact that stimulus oversight is one of the factors for success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97092782022-12-01 The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game Sanuki, Fumiya Nakphu, Nonthaporn Tahara, Ayumi Iramina, Keiji Front Neurorobot Neuroscience The first game-based treatment for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020. This game was developed for use at home as part of everyday training and can be used along with one’s usual training plan. In this game, two tasks are performed in parallel: (1) a perceptual discrimination targeting task (response and not response and avoiding responding to sudden pop-up targets) and (2) a sensory-motor navigation task (players continuously adjust their location to interact with or avoid positional targets). However, the brain activity of people playing this game was not examined, and the immersive environment (3D virtual world) was not considered. Therefore, we aimed to develop a system to investigate brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) during multitask gameplay in virtual reality (VR). In this experiment, we focused on the difference between the success and failure of the Go/No-Go task in a multitask game. We created a color discrimination task and a target tracking task in VR. The content of this game task was designed using previous multitask training. EEG and event data were recorded. Using event data, we can analyze the data in detail. We divided the trial types (Go and No-Go) and results (success and failure). We then compared the success and failure of each task. In the Go trial, the relative theta power in success at Fz was significantly higher than that of failure. However, no difference in power was observed in the No-Go trial. On the other hand, theta power was no different between success and failure in the other task. These results of the Go trial suggest that the participants were attentive to processing both tasks. Thus, it is possible that theta power in the frontal area 1 s before stimulation could predict the success or failure of the Go trial. On the other hand, the results of the No-Go trial may be due to the low number of No-Go failure trials and the fact that stimulus oversight is one of the factors for success. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9709278/ /pubmed/36467566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.1044071 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sanuki, Nakphu, Tahara and Iramina. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sanuki, Fumiya
Nakphu, Nonthaporn
Tahara, Ayumi
Iramina, Keiji
The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title_full The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title_fullStr The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title_short The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
title_sort comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.1044071
work_keys_str_mv AT sanukifumiya thecomparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT nakphunonthaporn thecomparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT taharaayumi thecomparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT iraminakeiji thecomparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT sanukifumiya comparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT nakphunonthaporn comparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT taharaayumi comparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame
AT iraminakeiji comparisonofelectroencephalographypowerandeventrelatedpotentialinsuccessandfailureduringmultitaskgame