Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model

AIMS: To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective. METHODS: We used data from the Repurposing anti-TNF for Dupuytren’s disease (RIDD) r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dakin, Helen, Rombach, Ines, Dritsaki, Melina, Gray, Alastair, Ball, Catherine, Lamb, Sarah E., Nanchahal, Jagdeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0103.R2
_version_ 1784841168519954432
author Dakin, Helen
Rombach, Ines
Dritsaki, Melina
Gray, Alastair
Ball, Catherine
Lamb, Sarah E.
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
author_facet Dakin, Helen
Rombach, Ines
Dritsaki, Melina
Gray, Alastair
Ball, Catherine
Lamb, Sarah E.
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
author_sort Dakin, Helen
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective. METHODS: We used data from the Repurposing anti-TNF for Dupuytren’s disease (RIDD) randomized controlled trial of intranodular adalimumab injections in patients with early-stage progressive DD. RIDD found that intranodular adalimumab injections reduced nodule hardness and size in patients with early-stage DD, indicating the potential to control disease progression. A within-trial cost-utility analysis compared four adalimumab injections with no further treatment against standard care alone, taking a 12-month time horizon and using prospective data on EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and resource use from the RIDD trial. We also developed a patient-level simulation model similar to a Markov model to extrapolate trial outcomes over a lifetime using data from the RIDD trial and a literature review. This also evaluated repeated courses of adalimumab each time the nodule reactivated (every three years) in patients who initially responded. RESULTS: The within-trial economic evaluation found that adalimumab plus standard care cost £503,410 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained versus standard care alone over a 12-month time horizon. The model-based extrapolation suggested that, over a lifetime, repeated courses of adalimumab could cost £14,593 (95% confidence interval £7,534 to £42,698) per QALY gained versus standard care alone. If the NHS was willing to pay £20,000/QALY gained, there is a 77% probability that adalimumab with retreatment is the best value for money. CONCLUSION: Repeated courses of adalimumab are likely to be a cost-effective treatment for progressive early-stage DD. The value of perfect parameter information that would eliminate all uncertainty around the parameters estimated in RIDD and the duration of quiescence was estimated to be £105 per patient or £272 million for all 2,584,411 prevalent cases in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):898–906.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97094912022-12-08 Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model Dakin, Helen Rombach, Ines Dritsaki, Melina Gray, Alastair Ball, Catherine Lamb, Sarah E. Nanchahal, Jagdeep Bone Jt Open Wrist & Hand AIMS: To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective. METHODS: We used data from the Repurposing anti-TNF for Dupuytren’s disease (RIDD) randomized controlled trial of intranodular adalimumab injections in patients with early-stage progressive DD. RIDD found that intranodular adalimumab injections reduced nodule hardness and size in patients with early-stage DD, indicating the potential to control disease progression. A within-trial cost-utility analysis compared four adalimumab injections with no further treatment against standard care alone, taking a 12-month time horizon and using prospective data on EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and resource use from the RIDD trial. We also developed a patient-level simulation model similar to a Markov model to extrapolate trial outcomes over a lifetime using data from the RIDD trial and a literature review. This also evaluated repeated courses of adalimumab each time the nodule reactivated (every three years) in patients who initially responded. RESULTS: The within-trial economic evaluation found that adalimumab plus standard care cost £503,410 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained versus standard care alone over a 12-month time horizon. The model-based extrapolation suggested that, over a lifetime, repeated courses of adalimumab could cost £14,593 (95% confidence interval £7,534 to £42,698) per QALY gained versus standard care alone. If the NHS was willing to pay £20,000/QALY gained, there is a 77% probability that adalimumab with retreatment is the best value for money. CONCLUSION: Repeated courses of adalimumab are likely to be a cost-effective treatment for progressive early-stage DD. The value of perfect parameter information that would eliminate all uncertainty around the parameters estimated in RIDD and the duration of quiescence was estimated to be £105 per patient or £272 million for all 2,584,411 prevalent cases in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):898–906. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9709491/ /pubmed/36378072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0103.R2 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Wrist & Hand
Dakin, Helen
Rombach, Ines
Dritsaki, Melina
Gray, Alastair
Ball, Catherine
Lamb, Sarah E.
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title_full Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title_short Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
title_sort cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage dupuytren’s disease: an economic evaluation based on a randomized controlled trial and individual-patient simulation model
topic Wrist & Hand
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0103.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT dakinhelen costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT rombachines costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT dritsakimelina costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT grayalastair costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT ballcatherine costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT lambsarahe costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel
AT nanchahaljagdeep costeffectivenessofadalimumabforearlystagedupuytrensdiseaseaneconomicevaluationbasedonarandomizedcontrolledtrialandindividualpatientsimulationmodel