Cargando…

Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment

This paper provides a demonstration-of-concept of a new methodology for comparing field electron emission (FE) theory and experiment. It uses the parameter κ in the mathematical equation I(m) = CV(m)(κ) exp[–B/V(m)] (where B and C are weakly varying or constants) that is taken to describe how measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filippov, Sergey V., Kolosko, Anatoly G., Popov, Eugeni O., Forbes, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220748
_version_ 1784841172529709056
author Filippov, Sergey V.
Kolosko, Anatoly G.
Popov, Eugeni O.
Forbes, Richard G.
author_facet Filippov, Sergey V.
Kolosko, Anatoly G.
Popov, Eugeni O.
Forbes, Richard G.
author_sort Filippov, Sergey V.
collection PubMed
description This paper provides a demonstration-of-concept of a new methodology for comparing field electron emission (FE) theory and experiment. It uses the parameter κ in the mathematical equation I(m) = CV(m)(κ) exp[–B/V(m)] (where B and C are weakly varying or constants) that is taken to describe how measured current I(m) depends on measured voltage V(m) for electronically ideal FE systems (i.e. systems that (i) have constant configuration during voltage application and (ii) have I(m)(V(m)) given by the emission physics alone). Experimental parameter values (κ(m)) are used to compare two alternative FE theories, for which allowable (but different) κ ranges have been established. At present, contributions to the ‘total theoretical κ’ made by voltage dependence of notional emission area are not well known: simulations reported here provide data about four commonly investigated emitter shapes. The methodology is then applied to compare 1928/1929 Fowler–Nordheim (FN) FE theory and 1956 Murphy–Good (MG) FE theory. It is theoretically certain that the 1956 theory is ‘better physics’ than the 1928/1929 theory. As in previous attempts to reach known correct theoretical conclusions by experimentally based argument, the new methodology tends to favour MG FE theory, but is formally indecisive at this stage. Further progress needs better methods of establishing error limits and of measuring κ(m).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97095082022-12-01 Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment Filippov, Sergey V. Kolosko, Anatoly G. Popov, Eugeni O. Forbes, Richard G. R Soc Open Sci Physics and Biophysics This paper provides a demonstration-of-concept of a new methodology for comparing field electron emission (FE) theory and experiment. It uses the parameter κ in the mathematical equation I(m) = CV(m)(κ) exp[–B/V(m)] (where B and C are weakly varying or constants) that is taken to describe how measured current I(m) depends on measured voltage V(m) for electronically ideal FE systems (i.e. systems that (i) have constant configuration during voltage application and (ii) have I(m)(V(m)) given by the emission physics alone). Experimental parameter values (κ(m)) are used to compare two alternative FE theories, for which allowable (but different) κ ranges have been established. At present, contributions to the ‘total theoretical κ’ made by voltage dependence of notional emission area are not well known: simulations reported here provide data about four commonly investigated emitter shapes. The methodology is then applied to compare 1928/1929 Fowler–Nordheim (FN) FE theory and 1956 Murphy–Good (MG) FE theory. It is theoretically certain that the 1956 theory is ‘better physics’ than the 1928/1929 theory. As in previous attempts to reach known correct theoretical conclusions by experimentally based argument, the new methodology tends to favour MG FE theory, but is formally indecisive at this stage. Further progress needs better methods of establishing error limits and of measuring κ(m). The Royal Society 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9709508/ /pubmed/36465671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220748 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Physics and Biophysics
Filippov, Sergey V.
Kolosko, Anatoly G.
Popov, Eugeni O.
Forbes, Richard G.
Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title_full Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title_fullStr Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title_full_unstemmed Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title_short Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
title_sort field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment
topic Physics and Biophysics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220748
work_keys_str_mv AT filippovsergeyv fieldemissioncalculationssupportinganewmethodologyofcomparingtheorywithexperiment
AT koloskoanatolyg fieldemissioncalculationssupportinganewmethodologyofcomparingtheorywithexperiment
AT popoveugenio fieldemissioncalculationssupportinganewmethodologyofcomparingtheorywithexperiment
AT forbesrichardg fieldemissioncalculationssupportinganewmethodologyofcomparingtheorywithexperiment