Cargando…

Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darden, Paul M., Davis, Ann M., Lee, Jeannette Y., Bimali, Milan, Simon, Alan E., Atz, Andrew M., Lim, Crystal S., Phan, Thao-Ly T., Roberts, James R., McCulloh, Russell J., Pyles, Lee, Shaffer, Michelle, Snowden, Jessica N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040
_version_ 1784841202710872064
author Darden, Paul M.
Davis, Ann M.
Lee, Jeannette Y.
Bimali, Milan
Simon, Alan E.
Atz, Andrew M.
Lim, Crystal S.
Phan, Thao-Ly T.
Roberts, James R.
McCulloh, Russell J.
Pyles, Lee
Shaffer, Michelle
Snowden, Jessica N.
author_facet Darden, Paul M.
Davis, Ann M.
Lee, Jeannette Y.
Bimali, Milan
Simon, Alan E.
Atz, Andrew M.
Lim, Crystal S.
Phan, Thao-Ly T.
Roberts, James R.
McCulloh, Russell J.
Pyles, Lee
Shaffer, Michelle
Snowden, Jessica N.
author_sort Darden, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care clinics to assess whether either or both methods are sufficiently effective for enrolling participants into a clinical trial of a behavioral telehealth intervention for children with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster-randomized clinical trial of 2 recruitment methods was conducted at 4 primary care clinics in 4 separate states. Each clinic used both recruitment methods in random order. Clinic eligibility criteria included at least 40% pediatric patients with Medicaid coverage and at least 100 potential participants. Eligibility criteria for children included a rural home address, age 6 to 11 years, and body mass index at or above the 85th percentile. Recruitment began February 3, 2020, and randomization of participants occurred on August 17, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Two recruitment methods were assessed: the active method, for which a list of potential participants seen within the past year at each clinic was generated through the electronic health record and consecutively approached by research staff based on visit date to the clinic, and the traditional method, for which recruitment included posters, flyers, social media, and press release. Clinics were randomized to the order in which the 2 methods were implemented in 4-week periods, followed by a 4-week catch-up period using the method found most effective in previous periods. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each recruitment method, the number and proportion of randomized children among those who were approached was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants were randomized (58 girls [55.8%]; mean age, 9.3 [95% CI, 9.0-9.6] years). Using the active method, 535 child-parent dyads were approached and 99 (18.5% [95% CI, 15.3%-22.1%]) were randomized. Using the traditional method, 23 caregivers expressed interest, and 5 (21.7% [95% CI, 7.5%-43.7%]) were randomized. All sites reached full enrollment using the active method and no sites achieved full enrollment using the traditional method. Mean time to full enrollment was 26.3 (range, 21.0-31.0) days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study supports the use of the active approach with local primary care clinics to recruit children with overweight and obesity from rural communities into clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04142034
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97096482022-12-14 Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial Darden, Paul M. Davis, Ann M. Lee, Jeannette Y. Bimali, Milan Simon, Alan E. Atz, Andrew M. Lim, Crystal S. Phan, Thao-Ly T. Roberts, James R. McCulloh, Russell J. Pyles, Lee Shaffer, Michelle Snowden, Jessica N. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care clinics to assess whether either or both methods are sufficiently effective for enrolling participants into a clinical trial of a behavioral telehealth intervention for children with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster-randomized clinical trial of 2 recruitment methods was conducted at 4 primary care clinics in 4 separate states. Each clinic used both recruitment methods in random order. Clinic eligibility criteria included at least 40% pediatric patients with Medicaid coverage and at least 100 potential participants. Eligibility criteria for children included a rural home address, age 6 to 11 years, and body mass index at or above the 85th percentile. Recruitment began February 3, 2020, and randomization of participants occurred on August 17, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Two recruitment methods were assessed: the active method, for which a list of potential participants seen within the past year at each clinic was generated through the electronic health record and consecutively approached by research staff based on visit date to the clinic, and the traditional method, for which recruitment included posters, flyers, social media, and press release. Clinics were randomized to the order in which the 2 methods were implemented in 4-week periods, followed by a 4-week catch-up period using the method found most effective in previous periods. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each recruitment method, the number and proportion of randomized children among those who were approached was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants were randomized (58 girls [55.8%]; mean age, 9.3 [95% CI, 9.0-9.6] years). Using the active method, 535 child-parent dyads were approached and 99 (18.5% [95% CI, 15.3%-22.1%]) were randomized. Using the traditional method, 23 caregivers expressed interest, and 5 (21.7% [95% CI, 7.5%-43.7%]) were randomized. All sites reached full enrollment using the active method and no sites achieved full enrollment using the traditional method. Mean time to full enrollment was 26.3 (range, 21.0-31.0) days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study supports the use of the active approach with local primary care clinics to recruit children with overweight and obesity from rural communities into clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04142034 American Medical Association 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9709648/ /pubmed/36445709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040 Text en Copyright 2022 Darden PM II et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Darden, Paul M.
Davis, Ann M.
Lee, Jeannette Y.
Bimali, Milan
Simon, Alan E.
Atz, Andrew M.
Lim, Crystal S.
Phan, Thao-Ly T.
Roberts, James R.
McCulloh, Russell J.
Pyles, Lee
Shaffer, Michelle
Snowden, Jessica N.
Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort active vs traditional methods of recruiting children for a clinical trial in rural primary care clinics: a cluster-randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040
work_keys_str_mv AT dardenpaulm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT davisannm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leejeannettey activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bimalimilan activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT simonalane activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT atzandrewm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT limcrystals activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT phanthaolyt activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT robertsjamesr activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mccullohrussellj activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pyleslee activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shaffermichelle activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT snowdenjessican activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial