Cargando…
Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040 |
_version_ | 1784841202710872064 |
---|---|
author | Darden, Paul M. Davis, Ann M. Lee, Jeannette Y. Bimali, Milan Simon, Alan E. Atz, Andrew M. Lim, Crystal S. Phan, Thao-Ly T. Roberts, James R. McCulloh, Russell J. Pyles, Lee Shaffer, Michelle Snowden, Jessica N. |
author_facet | Darden, Paul M. Davis, Ann M. Lee, Jeannette Y. Bimali, Milan Simon, Alan E. Atz, Andrew M. Lim, Crystal S. Phan, Thao-Ly T. Roberts, James R. McCulloh, Russell J. Pyles, Lee Shaffer, Michelle Snowden, Jessica N. |
author_sort | Darden, Paul M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care clinics to assess whether either or both methods are sufficiently effective for enrolling participants into a clinical trial of a behavioral telehealth intervention for children with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster-randomized clinical trial of 2 recruitment methods was conducted at 4 primary care clinics in 4 separate states. Each clinic used both recruitment methods in random order. Clinic eligibility criteria included at least 40% pediatric patients with Medicaid coverage and at least 100 potential participants. Eligibility criteria for children included a rural home address, age 6 to 11 years, and body mass index at or above the 85th percentile. Recruitment began February 3, 2020, and randomization of participants occurred on August 17, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Two recruitment methods were assessed: the active method, for which a list of potential participants seen within the past year at each clinic was generated through the electronic health record and consecutively approached by research staff based on visit date to the clinic, and the traditional method, for which recruitment included posters, flyers, social media, and press release. Clinics were randomized to the order in which the 2 methods were implemented in 4-week periods, followed by a 4-week catch-up period using the method found most effective in previous periods. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each recruitment method, the number and proportion of randomized children among those who were approached was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants were randomized (58 girls [55.8%]; mean age, 9.3 [95% CI, 9.0-9.6] years). Using the active method, 535 child-parent dyads were approached and 99 (18.5% [95% CI, 15.3%-22.1%]) were randomized. Using the traditional method, 23 caregivers expressed interest, and 5 (21.7% [95% CI, 7.5%-43.7%]) were randomized. All sites reached full enrollment using the active method and no sites achieved full enrollment using the traditional method. Mean time to full enrollment was 26.3 (range, 21.0-31.0) days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study supports the use of the active approach with local primary care clinics to recruit children with overweight and obesity from rural communities into clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04142034 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9709648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97096482022-12-14 Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial Darden, Paul M. Davis, Ann M. Lee, Jeannette Y. Bimali, Milan Simon, Alan E. Atz, Andrew M. Lim, Crystal S. Phan, Thao-Ly T. Roberts, James R. McCulloh, Russell J. Pyles, Lee Shaffer, Michelle Snowden, Jessica N. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no published randomized clinical trials of recruitment strategies. Rigorously evaluated successful recruitment strategies for children are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 2 recruitment methods for enrolling rural children through primary care clinics to assess whether either or both methods are sufficiently effective for enrolling participants into a clinical trial of a behavioral telehealth intervention for children with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster-randomized clinical trial of 2 recruitment methods was conducted at 4 primary care clinics in 4 separate states. Each clinic used both recruitment methods in random order. Clinic eligibility criteria included at least 40% pediatric patients with Medicaid coverage and at least 100 potential participants. Eligibility criteria for children included a rural home address, age 6 to 11 years, and body mass index at or above the 85th percentile. Recruitment began February 3, 2020, and randomization of participants occurred on August 17, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 3, 2021, to April 21, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Two recruitment methods were assessed: the active method, for which a list of potential participants seen within the past year at each clinic was generated through the electronic health record and consecutively approached by research staff based on visit date to the clinic, and the traditional method, for which recruitment included posters, flyers, social media, and press release. Clinics were randomized to the order in which the 2 methods were implemented in 4-week periods, followed by a 4-week catch-up period using the method found most effective in previous periods. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each recruitment method, the number and proportion of randomized children among those who were approached was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants were randomized (58 girls [55.8%]; mean age, 9.3 [95% CI, 9.0-9.6] years). Using the active method, 535 child-parent dyads were approached and 99 (18.5% [95% CI, 15.3%-22.1%]) were randomized. Using the traditional method, 23 caregivers expressed interest, and 5 (21.7% [95% CI, 7.5%-43.7%]) were randomized. All sites reached full enrollment using the active method and no sites achieved full enrollment using the traditional method. Mean time to full enrollment was 26.3 (range, 21.0-31.0) days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study supports the use of the active approach with local primary care clinics to recruit children with overweight and obesity from rural communities into clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04142034 American Medical Association 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9709648/ /pubmed/36445709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040 Text en Copyright 2022 Darden PM II et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Darden, Paul M. Davis, Ann M. Lee, Jeannette Y. Bimali, Milan Simon, Alan E. Atz, Andrew M. Lim, Crystal S. Phan, Thao-Ly T. Roberts, James R. McCulloh, Russell J. Pyles, Lee Shaffer, Michelle Snowden, Jessica N. Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Active vs Traditional Methods of Recruiting Children for a Clinical Trial in Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | active vs traditional methods of recruiting children for a clinical trial in rural primary care clinics: a cluster-randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dardenpaulm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT davisannm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT leejeannettey activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bimalimilan activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT simonalane activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT atzandrewm activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT limcrystals activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT phanthaolyt activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT robertsjamesr activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mccullohrussellj activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT pyleslee activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT shaffermichelle activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT snowdenjessican activevstraditionalmethodsofrecruitingchildrenforaclinicaltrialinruralprimarycareclinicsaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial |