Cargando…

The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Liping, Li, Wenrui, Zhang, Xianzhuo, Tian, Jinhui, Ma, Xiaojia, Han, Lulu, Wei, Huaping, Meng, Wenbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970
_version_ 1784841240173346816
author Yang, Liping
Li, Wenrui
Zhang, Xianzhuo
Tian, Jinhui
Ma, Xiaojia
Han, Lulu
Wei, Huaping
Meng, Wenbo
author_facet Yang, Liping
Li, Wenrui
Zhang, Xianzhuo
Tian, Jinhui
Ma, Xiaojia
Han, Lulu
Wei, Huaping
Meng, Wenbo
author_sort Yang, Liping
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database. We also tracked the references found in systematic reviews of RCDAD treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different types of fecal microbiota transplantation with other methods for the treatment of RCDAD. The search period was from the date of inception of this treatment method to January 16, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the published literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata 16.0 and R 4.1.2 software. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 765 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. The results showed that treatment with fresh fecal bacteria and frozen fecal bacteria were better than vancomycin, fresh vs. vancomycin [odds ratio, (OR) = 8.98, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (1.84, 43.92)], frozen vs. vancomycin [OR = 7.44, 95% CI (1.39, 39.75)]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in cure rate [fresh vs. frozen: OR = 1.21, 95% CI (0.22, 6.77); fresh vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.95, 95% CI (0.20, 19.44); frozen vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.62, 95% CI (0.30, 8.85)]. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) indicated that fresh fecal bacteria were the best treatment for RCDAD. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh fecal bacteria are the best treatment of RCDAD, frozen fecal bacteria and lyophilized fecal bacteria can achieve the same effect. Fecal microbiota transplantation is worthy of clinical and commercial application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9709817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97098172022-12-01 The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Yang, Liping Li, Wenrui Zhang, Xianzhuo Tian, Jinhui Ma, Xiaojia Han, Lulu Wei, Huaping Meng, Wenbo Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database. We also tracked the references found in systematic reviews of RCDAD treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different types of fecal microbiota transplantation with other methods for the treatment of RCDAD. The search period was from the date of inception of this treatment method to January 16, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the published literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata 16.0 and R 4.1.2 software. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 765 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. The results showed that treatment with fresh fecal bacteria and frozen fecal bacteria were better than vancomycin, fresh vs. vancomycin [odds ratio, (OR) = 8.98, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (1.84, 43.92)], frozen vs. vancomycin [OR = 7.44, 95% CI (1.39, 39.75)]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in cure rate [fresh vs. frozen: OR = 1.21, 95% CI (0.22, 6.77); fresh vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.95, 95% CI (0.20, 19.44); frozen vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.62, 95% CI (0.30, 8.85)]. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) indicated that fresh fecal bacteria were the best treatment for RCDAD. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh fecal bacteria are the best treatment of RCDAD, frozen fecal bacteria and lyophilized fecal bacteria can achieve the same effect. Fecal microbiota transplantation is worthy of clinical and commercial application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9709817/ /pubmed/36468073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970 Text en © 2022 Yang, Li, Zhang, Tian, Ma, Han, Wei and Meng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Yang, Liping
Li, Wenrui
Zhang, Xianzhuo
Tian, Jinhui
Ma, Xiaojia
Han, Lulu
Wei, Huaping
Meng, Wenbo
The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970
work_keys_str_mv AT yangliping theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liwenrui theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxianzhuo theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianjinhui theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maxiaojia theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hanlulu theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weihuaping theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mengwenbo theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangliping evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liwenrui evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxianzhuo evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianjinhui evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maxiaojia evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hanlulu evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weihuaping evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mengwenbo evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis