Cargando…
The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970 |
_version_ | 1784841240173346816 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Liping Li, Wenrui Zhang, Xianzhuo Tian, Jinhui Ma, Xiaojia Han, Lulu Wei, Huaping Meng, Wenbo |
author_facet | Yang, Liping Li, Wenrui Zhang, Xianzhuo Tian, Jinhui Ma, Xiaojia Han, Lulu Wei, Huaping Meng, Wenbo |
author_sort | Yang, Liping |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database. We also tracked the references found in systematic reviews of RCDAD treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different types of fecal microbiota transplantation with other methods for the treatment of RCDAD. The search period was from the date of inception of this treatment method to January 16, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the published literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata 16.0 and R 4.1.2 software. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 765 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. The results showed that treatment with fresh fecal bacteria and frozen fecal bacteria were better than vancomycin, fresh vs. vancomycin [odds ratio, (OR) = 8.98, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (1.84, 43.92)], frozen vs. vancomycin [OR = 7.44, 95% CI (1.39, 39.75)]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in cure rate [fresh vs. frozen: OR = 1.21, 95% CI (0.22, 6.77); fresh vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.95, 95% CI (0.20, 19.44); frozen vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.62, 95% CI (0.30, 8.85)]. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) indicated that fresh fecal bacteria were the best treatment for RCDAD. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh fecal bacteria are the best treatment of RCDAD, frozen fecal bacteria and lyophilized fecal bacteria can achieve the same effect. Fecal microbiota transplantation is worthy of clinical and commercial application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9709817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97098172022-12-01 The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Yang, Liping Li, Wenrui Zhang, Xianzhuo Tian, Jinhui Ma, Xiaojia Han, Lulu Wei, Huaping Meng, Wenbo Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of different types of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (RCDAD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database. We also tracked the references found in systematic reviews of RCDAD treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different types of fecal microbiota transplantation with other methods for the treatment of RCDAD. The search period was from the date of inception of this treatment method to January 16, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the published literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata 16.0 and R 4.1.2 software. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 765 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. The results showed that treatment with fresh fecal bacteria and frozen fecal bacteria were better than vancomycin, fresh vs. vancomycin [odds ratio, (OR) = 8.98, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (1.84, 43.92)], frozen vs. vancomycin [OR = 7.44, 95% CI (1.39, 39.75)]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in cure rate [fresh vs. frozen: OR = 1.21, 95% CI (0.22, 6.77); fresh vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.95, 95% CI (0.20, 19.44); frozen vs. lyophilized, OR = 1.62, 95% CI (0.30, 8.85)]. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) indicated that fresh fecal bacteria were the best treatment for RCDAD. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh fecal bacteria are the best treatment of RCDAD, frozen fecal bacteria and lyophilized fecal bacteria can achieve the same effect. Fecal microbiota transplantation is worthy of clinical and commercial application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9709817/ /pubmed/36468073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970 Text en © 2022 Yang, Li, Zhang, Tian, Ma, Han, Wei and Meng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Yang, Liping Li, Wenrui Zhang, Xianzhuo Tian, Jinhui Ma, Xiaojia Han, Lulu Wei, Huaping Meng, Wenbo The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrent clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangliping theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liwenrui theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangxianzhuo theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT tianjinhui theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maxiaojia theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hanlulu theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT weihuaping theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mengwenbo theevaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yangliping evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liwenrui evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangxianzhuo evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT tianjinhui evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maxiaojia evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hanlulu evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT weihuaping evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mengwenbo evaluationofdifferenttypesfecalbacteriaproductsforthetreatmentofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileassociateddiarrheaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |