Cargando…

Patient-derived Siglec-6-targeting antibodies engineered for T-cell recruitment have potential therapeutic utility in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous therapeutic options, safe and curative therapy is unavailable for most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A drawback of current therapies such as the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab is the elimination of all healthy B cells, resulting in impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cyr, Matthew G, Mhibik, Maissa, Qi, Junpeng, Peng, Haiyong, Chang, Jing, Gaglione, Erika M, Eik, David, Herrick, John, Venables, Thomas, Novick, Scott J, Courouble, Valentine V, Griffin, Patrick R, Wiestner, Adrian, Rader, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36442911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004850
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite numerous therapeutic options, safe and curative therapy is unavailable for most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A drawback of current therapies such as the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab is the elimination of all healthy B cells, resulting in impaired humoral immunity. We previously reported the identification of a patient-derived, CLL-binding mAb, JML-1, and identified sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-6 (Siglec-6) as the target of JML-1. Although little is known about Siglec-6, it appears to be an attractive target for cancer immunotherapy due to its absence on most healthy cells and tissues. METHODS: We used a target-specific approach to mine for additional patient-derived anti-Siglec-6 mAbs. To assess the therapeutic utility of targeting Siglec-6 in the context of CLL, T cell-recruiting bispecific antibodies (T-biAbs) that bind to Siglec-6 and CD3 were engineered into single-chain variable fragment–Fc and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)–Fc constructs. T-biAbs were evaluated for their activity in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. RESULTS: We discovered the anti-Siglec-6 mAbs RC-1 and RC-2, which bind with higher affinity than JML-1 yet maintain similar specificity. Both JML-1 and RC-1 T-biAbs were effective at activating T cells and killing Siglec-6(+) target cells. The RC-1 clone in the DART–Fc format was the most potent T-biAb tested and was the only anti-Siglec-6 T-biAb that eliminated Siglec-6(+) primary CLL cells via autologous T cells at pathological T-to-CLL cell ratios. Tested at healthy T-to-B cell ratios, it also eliminated a Siglec-6(+) fraction of primary B cells from healthy donors. The subpicomolar potency of the DART–Fc format was attributed to the reduction in the length and flexibility of the cytolytic synapse. Furthermore, the RC-1 T-biAb was effective at clearing MEC1 CLL cells in vivo and demonstrated a circulatory half-life of over 7 days. CONCLUSION: Siglec-6-targeting T-biAbs are highly potent and specific for eliminating Siglec-6(+) leukemic and healthy B cells while sparing Siglec-6(−) healthy B cells, suggesting a unique treatment strategy for CLL with diminished suppression of humoral immunity. Our data corroborate reports that T-biAb efficacy is dependent on synapse geometry and reveal that synapse architecture can be tuned via antibody engineering. Our fully human anti-Siglec-6 antibodies and T-biAbs have potential for cancer immunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00923507.