Cargando…

Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies

Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akkari, Yassmine M.N., Baughn, Linda B., Dubuc, Adrian M., Smith, Adam C., Mallo, Mar, Dal Cin, Paola, Diez Campelo, Maria, Gallego, Marta S., Granada Font, Isabel, Haase, Detlef T., Schlegelberger, Brigitte, Slavutsky, Irma, Mecucci, Cristina, Levine, Ross L., Hasserjian, Robert P., Solé, Francesc, Levy, Brynn, Xu, Xinjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society of Hematology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021014309
_version_ 1784841376470401024
author Akkari, Yassmine M.N.
Baughn, Linda B.
Dubuc, Adrian M.
Smith, Adam C.
Mallo, Mar
Dal Cin, Paola
Diez Campelo, Maria
Gallego, Marta S.
Granada Font, Isabel
Haase, Detlef T.
Schlegelberger, Brigitte
Slavutsky, Irma
Mecucci, Cristina
Levine, Ross L.
Hasserjian, Robert P.
Solé, Francesc
Levy, Brynn
Xu, Xinjie
author_facet Akkari, Yassmine M.N.
Baughn, Linda B.
Dubuc, Adrian M.
Smith, Adam C.
Mallo, Mar
Dal Cin, Paola
Diez Campelo, Maria
Gallego, Marta S.
Granada Font, Isabel
Haase, Detlef T.
Schlegelberger, Brigitte
Slavutsky, Irma
Mecucci, Cristina
Levine, Ross L.
Hasserjian, Robert P.
Solé, Francesc
Levy, Brynn
Xu, Xinjie
author_sort Akkari, Yassmine M.N.
collection PubMed
description Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9710485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The American Society of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97104852023-04-14 Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies Akkari, Yassmine M.N. Baughn, Linda B. Dubuc, Adrian M. Smith, Adam C. Mallo, Mar Dal Cin, Paola Diez Campelo, Maria Gallego, Marta S. Granada Font, Isabel Haase, Detlef T. Schlegelberger, Brigitte Slavutsky, Irma Mecucci, Cristina Levine, Ross L. Hasserjian, Robert P. Solé, Francesc Levy, Brynn Xu, Xinjie Blood Special Report Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing. The American Society of Hematology 2022-04-14 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9710485/ /pubmed/35167654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021014309 Text en Copyright © 2022 American Society of Hematology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Special Report
Akkari, Yassmine M.N.
Baughn, Linda B.
Dubuc, Adrian M.
Smith, Adam C.
Mallo, Mar
Dal Cin, Paola
Diez Campelo, Maria
Gallego, Marta S.
Granada Font, Isabel
Haase, Detlef T.
Schlegelberger, Brigitte
Slavutsky, Irma
Mecucci, Cristina
Levine, Ross L.
Hasserjian, Robert P.
Solé, Francesc
Levy, Brynn
Xu, Xinjie
Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title_full Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title_fullStr Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title_short Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
title_sort guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
topic Special Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021014309
work_keys_str_mv AT akkariyassminemn guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT baughnlindab guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT dubucadrianm guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT smithadamc guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT mallomar guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT dalcinpaola guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT diezcampelomaria guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT gallegomartas guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT granadafontisabel guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT haasedetleft guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT schlegelbergerbrigitte guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT slavutskyirma guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT mecuccicristina guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT levinerossl guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT hasserjianrobertp guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT solefrancesc guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT levybrynn guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies
AT xuxinjie guidingtheglobalevolutionofcytogenetictestingforhematologicmalignancies