Cargando…
A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models
: Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein–protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated [Formula: see text] docking models for each of the 230 complexes in the protein–protein b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbab042 |
_version_ | 1784841400542560256 |
---|---|
author | Barradas-Bautista, Didier Cao, Zhen Vangone, Anna Oliva, Romina Cavallo, Luigi |
author_facet | Barradas-Bautista, Didier Cao, Zhen Vangone, Anna Oliva, Romina Cavallo, Luigi |
author_sort | Barradas-Bautista, Didier |
collection | PubMed |
description | : Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein–protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated [Formula: see text] docking models for each of the 230 complexes in the protein–protein benchmark, version 5, using three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK), for a cumulative set of [Formula: see text] docking models. Three different machine learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named COnservation Driven Expert System (CoDES). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. SOFTWARE AND DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The docking models are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. The programs underlying this article will be shared on request to the corresponding authors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9710594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97105942023-01-24 A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models Barradas-Bautista, Didier Cao, Zhen Vangone, Anna Oliva, Romina Cavallo, Luigi Bioinform Adv Original Paper : Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein–protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated [Formula: see text] docking models for each of the 230 complexes in the protein–protein benchmark, version 5, using three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK), for a cumulative set of [Formula: see text] docking models. Three different machine learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named COnservation Driven Expert System (CoDES). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. SOFTWARE AND DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The docking models are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. The programs underlying this article will be shared on request to the corresponding authors. Oxford University Press 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9710594/ /pubmed/36699405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbab042 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Barradas-Bautista, Didier Cao, Zhen Vangone, Anna Oliva, Romina Cavallo, Luigi A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title | A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title_full | A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title_fullStr | A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title_full_unstemmed | A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title_short | A random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
title_sort | random forest classifier for protein–protein docking models |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbab042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barradasbautistadidier arandomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT caozhen arandomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT vangoneanna arandomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT olivaromina arandomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT cavalloluigi arandomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT barradasbautistadidier randomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT caozhen randomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT vangoneanna randomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT olivaromina randomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels AT cavalloluigi randomforestclassifierforproteinproteindockingmodels |