Cargando…

Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pretzsch, Elise, Koliogiannis, Dionysios, D’Haese, Jan Gustav, Ilmer, Matthias, Guba, Markus Otto, Angele, Martin Konrad, Werner, Jens, Niess, Hanno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36449597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149
_version_ 1784841429084798976
author Pretzsch, Elise
Koliogiannis, Dionysios
D’Haese, Jan Gustav
Ilmer, Matthias
Guba, Markus Otto
Angele, Martin Konrad
Werner, Jens
Niess, Hanno
author_facet Pretzsch, Elise
Koliogiannis, Dionysios
D’Haese, Jan Gustav
Ilmer, Matthias
Guba, Markus Otto
Angele, Martin Konrad
Werner, Jens
Niess, Hanno
author_sort Pretzsch, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. RESULTS: Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16–69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included ‘no prolonged length of stay (LOS)’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. CONCLUSION: TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include ‘no prolonged LOS’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9710735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97107352022-12-01 Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review Pretzsch, Elise Koliogiannis, Dionysios D’Haese, Jan Gustav Ilmer, Matthias Guba, Markus Otto Angele, Martin Konrad Werner, Jens Niess, Hanno BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. RESULTS: Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16–69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included ‘no prolonged length of stay (LOS)’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. CONCLUSION: TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include ‘no prolonged LOS’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Oxford University Press 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9710735/ /pubmed/36449597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Pretzsch, Elise
Koliogiannis, Dionysios
D’Haese, Jan Gustav
Ilmer, Matthias
Guba, Markus Otto
Angele, Martin Konrad
Werner, Jens
Niess, Hanno
Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title_full Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title_fullStr Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title_short Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
title_sort textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36449597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149
work_keys_str_mv AT pretzschelise textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT koliogiannisdionysios textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT dhaesejangustav textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT ilmermatthias textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT gubamarkusotto textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT angelemartinkonrad textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT wernerjens textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview
AT niesshanno textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview