Cargando…
Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review
BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a def...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36449597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149 |
_version_ | 1784841429084798976 |
---|---|
author | Pretzsch, Elise Koliogiannis, Dionysios D’Haese, Jan Gustav Ilmer, Matthias Guba, Markus Otto Angele, Martin Konrad Werner, Jens Niess, Hanno |
author_facet | Pretzsch, Elise Koliogiannis, Dionysios D’Haese, Jan Gustav Ilmer, Matthias Guba, Markus Otto Angele, Martin Konrad Werner, Jens Niess, Hanno |
author_sort | Pretzsch, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. RESULTS: Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16–69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included ‘no prolonged length of stay (LOS)’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. CONCLUSION: TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include ‘no prolonged LOS’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9710735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97107352022-12-01 Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review Pretzsch, Elise Koliogiannis, Dionysios D’Haese, Jan Gustav Ilmer, Matthias Guba, Markus Otto Angele, Martin Konrad Werner, Jens Niess, Hanno BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. RESULTS: Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16–69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included ‘no prolonged length of stay (LOS)’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. CONCLUSION: TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include ‘no prolonged LOS’, ‘no complications’, ‘no readmission’, and ‘no deaths’. Oxford University Press 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9710735/ /pubmed/36449597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Pretzsch, Elise Koliogiannis, Dionysios D’Haese, Jan Gustav Ilmer, Matthias Guba, Markus Otto Angele, Martin Konrad Werner, Jens Niess, Hanno Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title | Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title_full | Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title_short | Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
title_sort | textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36449597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pretzschelise textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT koliogiannisdionysios textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT dhaesejangustav textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT ilmermatthias textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT gubamarkusotto textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT angelemartinkonrad textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT wernerjens textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview AT niesshanno textbookoutcomeinhepatopancreatobiliarysurgerysystematicreview |