Cargando…

Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions. AIM: To assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study using data fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strongman, Helen, Herrett, Emily, Jackson, Rod, Sweeting, Michael, Lyon, Alexander R, Stanway, Susannah, Lawson, Claire, Kadam, Umesh, Smeeth, Liam, Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0088
_version_ 1784841452750110720
author Strongman, Helen
Herrett, Emily
Jackson, Rod
Sweeting, Michael
Lyon, Alexander R
Stanway, Susannah
Lawson, Claire
Kadam, Umesh
Smeeth, Liam
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
author_facet Strongman, Helen
Herrett, Emily
Jackson, Rod
Sweeting, Michael
Lyon, Alexander R
Stanway, Susannah
Lawson, Claire
Kadam, Umesh
Smeeth, Liam
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
author_sort Strongman, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions. AIM: To assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study using data from English general practices linked to hospital, cancer registration, and death registration data from 1990 to 2015. METHOD: Adults alive 1 year after a first cancer diagnosis and age, sex, general practice, and calendar- time matched cancer-free individuals were included. Individuals with <2 years of follow-up before index, recent statin prescriptions, or pre-existing coronary heart or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models used to develop QRISK3 scores were replicated with added cancer history variables. Whether independent hazard ratios for these variables met thresholds for inclusion in QRISK3 (>10% relative difference with P<0.01) was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 81 420 cancer survivors and 413 547 cancer-free individuals were followed for a median 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8– 9.1) and 6.3 years (IQR 3.5–10.2), respectively. Including a 1-year cancer survivorship variable in a QRISK3-based model met the threshold for inclusion for males (independent hazard ratio [iHR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.20, P<0.001) but not females (iHR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14, P = 0.02). When including cancer type, the threshold was met for both sexes with history of haematological cancer (males: iHR 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.40, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32 to 1.91, P<0.001) and for males but not females with history of solid cancers (males: iHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.10, P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Developers should consider including cancer history variables in future cardiovascular risk models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9710863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97108632022-12-08 Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study Strongman, Helen Herrett, Emily Jackson, Rod Sweeting, Michael Lyon, Alexander R Stanway, Susannah Lawson, Claire Kadam, Umesh Smeeth, Liam Bhaskaran, Krishnan Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions. AIM: To assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study using data from English general practices linked to hospital, cancer registration, and death registration data from 1990 to 2015. METHOD: Adults alive 1 year after a first cancer diagnosis and age, sex, general practice, and calendar- time matched cancer-free individuals were included. Individuals with <2 years of follow-up before index, recent statin prescriptions, or pre-existing coronary heart or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models used to develop QRISK3 scores were replicated with added cancer history variables. Whether independent hazard ratios for these variables met thresholds for inclusion in QRISK3 (>10% relative difference with P<0.01) was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 81 420 cancer survivors and 413 547 cancer-free individuals were followed for a median 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8– 9.1) and 6.3 years (IQR 3.5–10.2), respectively. Including a 1-year cancer survivorship variable in a QRISK3-based model met the threshold for inclusion for males (independent hazard ratio [iHR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.20, P<0.001) but not females (iHR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14, P = 0.02). When including cancer type, the threshold was met for both sexes with history of haematological cancer (males: iHR 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.40, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32 to 1.91, P<0.001) and for males but not females with history of solid cancers (males: iHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.10, P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Developers should consider including cancer history variables in future cardiovascular risk models. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9710863/ /pubmed/36443065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0088 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Strongman, Helen
Herrett, Emily
Jackson, Rod
Sweeting, Michael
Lyon, Alexander R
Stanway, Susannah
Lawson, Claire
Kadam, Umesh
Smeeth, Liam
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title_full Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title_fullStr Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title_short Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
title_sort cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9710863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0088
work_keys_str_mv AT strongmanhelen cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT herrettemily cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT jacksonrod cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT sweetingmichael cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT lyonalexanderr cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT stanwaysusannah cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT lawsonclaire cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT kadamumesh cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT smeethliam cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy
AT bhaskarankrishnan cancerhistoryasapredictorincardiovascularriskscoresaprimarycarecohortstudy