Cargando…

Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography

[Purpose] Young’s modulus distributions for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large sample of healthy individuals, based on ultrasonography and compression testing, remains uninvestigated till date. This study aimed to separately estimate the hardness of subcutaneous tissues and muscles in the hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isogai, Kaoru, Okamoto, Shogo, Asaba, Takayuki, Ogusu, Shogo, Shimizu, Yusuke, Watanabe, Takafumi, Yamada, Yoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.777
_version_ 1784841693936222208
author Isogai, Kaoru
Okamoto, Shogo
Asaba, Takayuki
Ogusu, Shogo
Shimizu, Yusuke
Watanabe, Takafumi
Yamada, Yoji
author_facet Isogai, Kaoru
Okamoto, Shogo
Asaba, Takayuki
Ogusu, Shogo
Shimizu, Yusuke
Watanabe, Takafumi
Yamada, Yoji
author_sort Isogai, Kaoru
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Young’s modulus distributions for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large sample of healthy individuals, based on ultrasonography and compression testing, remains uninvestigated till date. This study aimed to separately estimate the hardness of subcutaneous tissues and muscles in the human gluteal region under a range of loads in terms of mean Young’s moduli and associated distributions. [Participants and Methods] Data of 21 males aged 20–22 years were acquired using synchronous compression testing and ultrasonography. Stress-strain curves comprised the loads applied (stress) were plotted against ultrasonographic changes in subcutaneous/muscle tissue thickness (strain). Young’s moduli were calculated as slopes of approximation curves fitted to highly linear regions of the stress-strain curves. [Results] Young’s moduli (mean ± standard deviation) for gluteal subcutaneous and muscle tissues were estimated as: 26.1 ± 19.0 kPa, 1-N load; 2,199.1 ± 1,354.8 kPa, 30-N load; and 62.2 ± 10.3 kPa, 5-N load; 440.4 ± 80.0 kPa, 30-N load, respectively. No correlation between any pair of these measures reached statistical significance. [Conclusion] Young’s moduli were successfully measured for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large participant sample using ultrasonography and compression testing. Our results may serve as reference data when assessing tissue hardness by palpation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9711973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97119732022-12-10 Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography Isogai, Kaoru Okamoto, Shogo Asaba, Takayuki Ogusu, Shogo Shimizu, Yusuke Watanabe, Takafumi Yamada, Yoji J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Young’s modulus distributions for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large sample of healthy individuals, based on ultrasonography and compression testing, remains uninvestigated till date. This study aimed to separately estimate the hardness of subcutaneous tissues and muscles in the human gluteal region under a range of loads in terms of mean Young’s moduli and associated distributions. [Participants and Methods] Data of 21 males aged 20–22 years were acquired using synchronous compression testing and ultrasonography. Stress-strain curves comprised the loads applied (stress) were plotted against ultrasonographic changes in subcutaneous/muscle tissue thickness (strain). Young’s moduli were calculated as slopes of approximation curves fitted to highly linear regions of the stress-strain curves. [Results] Young’s moduli (mean ± standard deviation) for gluteal subcutaneous and muscle tissues were estimated as: 26.1 ± 19.0 kPa, 1-N load; 2,199.1 ± 1,354.8 kPa, 30-N load; and 62.2 ± 10.3 kPa, 5-N load; 440.4 ± 80.0 kPa, 30-N load, respectively. No correlation between any pair of these measures reached statistical significance. [Conclusion] Young’s moduli were successfully measured for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large participant sample using ultrasonography and compression testing. Our results may serve as reference data when assessing tissue hardness by palpation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022-12-01 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9711973/ /pubmed/36507079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.777 Text en 2022©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Isogai, Kaoru
Okamoto, Shogo
Asaba, Takayuki
Ogusu, Shogo
Shimizu, Yusuke
Watanabe, Takafumi
Yamada, Yoji
Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title_full Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title_fullStr Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title_short Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
title_sort young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.777
work_keys_str_mv AT isogaikaoru youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT okamotoshogo youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT asabatakayuki youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT ogusushogo youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT shimizuyusuke youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT watanabetakafumi youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography
AT yamadayoji youngsmoduliofsubcutaneoustissuesandmusclesunderdifferentloadsattheglutealregioncalculatedusingultrasonography