Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgery in treating medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with varus deformity. An accurate orthopaedy is the key and challenge to the success of HTO. Therefore, we designed a calibratable patient-specific instrumentation (PSI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Fawei, Yang, Xucheng, Wang, Chenggong, Su, Shilong, Qi, Jun, Li, Zhigang, Chen, Juehao, Zhong, Da
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1378042
_version_ 1784841696013451264
author Gao, Fawei
Yang, Xucheng
Wang, Chenggong
Su, Shilong
Qi, Jun
Li, Zhigang
Chen, Juehao
Zhong, Da
author_facet Gao, Fawei
Yang, Xucheng
Wang, Chenggong
Su, Shilong
Qi, Jun
Li, Zhigang
Chen, Juehao
Zhong, Da
author_sort Gao, Fawei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgery in treating medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with varus deformity. An accurate orthopaedy is the key and challenge to the success of HTO. Therefore, we designed a calibratable patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to assist surgery and evaluated its accuracy and clinical outcomes by comparing with conventional operation (CO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 patients (39 knees) with medial compartment KOA were randomly divided into the PSI and CO groups and underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) from September 2020 to May 2021. The postoperative radiological outcomes were compared with the preoperative measurements or target values to evaluate the accuracy of correction in the two groups. The American Knee Society Score (AKSS), complication rate, number of intraoperative radiation exposures, blood loss volume, and operative duration were analysed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the two groups. RESULTS: The designed target values were better achieved in the PSI group than in the CO group. The mean absolute difference between the postoperative measurements and preoperative targets was significantly lower in the PSI group than in the CO group (weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, 1.97 ± 1.83% vs.5.42 ± 4.41%, P = 0.002; hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, 1.12 ± 0.86° vs. 2.27 ± 1.97°, P = 0.018). The operative duration was significantly shorter (P = 0.014), and the number of radiation exposures (P < 0.001) and volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the PSI group than in the CO group. The clinical AKSS score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and the functional AKSS score at 3 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the PSI group than in the CO group (P = 0.042, 0.040, and 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSION: For patients with medial compartment KOA, calibratable PSI can assist the surgeon in MOWHTO with superior accuracy and clinical efficacy. This study was conducted under Randomized Controlled Trial Details (RCT) with Registry Number ChiCTR2000038619.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9711981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97119812022-12-01 Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Gao, Fawei Yang, Xucheng Wang, Chenggong Su, Shilong Qi, Jun Li, Zhigang Chen, Juehao Zhong, Da Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgery in treating medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with varus deformity. An accurate orthopaedy is the key and challenge to the success of HTO. Therefore, we designed a calibratable patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to assist surgery and evaluated its accuracy and clinical outcomes by comparing with conventional operation (CO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 patients (39 knees) with medial compartment KOA were randomly divided into the PSI and CO groups and underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) from September 2020 to May 2021. The postoperative radiological outcomes were compared with the preoperative measurements or target values to evaluate the accuracy of correction in the two groups. The American Knee Society Score (AKSS), complication rate, number of intraoperative radiation exposures, blood loss volume, and operative duration were analysed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the two groups. RESULTS: The designed target values were better achieved in the PSI group than in the CO group. The mean absolute difference between the postoperative measurements and preoperative targets was significantly lower in the PSI group than in the CO group (weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, 1.97 ± 1.83% vs.5.42 ± 4.41%, P = 0.002; hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, 1.12 ± 0.86° vs. 2.27 ± 1.97°, P = 0.018). The operative duration was significantly shorter (P = 0.014), and the number of radiation exposures (P < 0.001) and volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the PSI group than in the CO group. The clinical AKSS score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and the functional AKSS score at 3 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the PSI group than in the CO group (P = 0.042, 0.040, and 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSION: For patients with medial compartment KOA, calibratable PSI can assist the surgeon in MOWHTO with superior accuracy and clinical efficacy. This study was conducted under Randomized Controlled Trial Details (RCT) with Registry Number ChiCTR2000038619. Hindawi 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9711981/ /pubmed/36467884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1378042 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fawei Gao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gao, Fawei
Yang, Xucheng
Wang, Chenggong
Su, Shilong
Qi, Jun
Li, Zhigang
Chen, Juehao
Zhong, Da
Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Calibratable Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Operation for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between calibratable patient-specific instrumentation and conventional operation for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1378042
work_keys_str_mv AT gaofawei comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangxucheng comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangchenggong comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sushilong comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qijun comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lizhigang comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenjuehao comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhongda comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweencalibratablepatientspecificinstrumentationandconventionaloperationformedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial