Cargando…
A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254 |
_version_ | 1784841697283276800 |
---|---|
author | Li, Qun Yu, Fengting Song, Chuan Zhao, Hongxin Yan, Liting Xiao, Qing Lao, Xiaojie Yang, Siyuan Tang, Yunxia Xiao, Jiang Zhang, Fujie |
author_facet | Li, Qun Yu, Fengting Song, Chuan Zhao, Hongxin Yan, Liting Xiao, Qing Lao, Xiaojie Yang, Siyuan Tang, Yunxia Xiao, Jiang Zhang, Fujie |
author_sort | Li, Qun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in LLV samples. METHODS: A series of clinical samples were diluted and amplified for genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to prove the performance of the LCR. The Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the mutations. HIV-1 subtypes and CRFs were determined using the COMET online tool. The overall success rate of genotyping was compared with ultracentrifugation combined with SS. Furthermore, the success rates at varied VL of the two concentration methods were evaluated, and the DRMs of diluted samples were compared with those undiluted samples. RESULTS: When LCR was used, the overall success rate was 90% (72/80) in the PR and RT regions and 60% (48/80) in the IN region. In addition, when HIV RNA was 1000 copies/ml, 400 copies/ml, 200 copies/ml, and 100 copies/ml, the success rates of PR and RT regions were 100%, 100%, 95%, and 65%, respectively, while the success rates of IN region were 85%, 60%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. We found that the sample DR-387A2 missed the E138A mutation, and mutations in other samples were consistent with undiluted samples using LCR. CONCLUSIONS: LCR will support monitoring DRMs in HIV-1 patients with LLV and can be an effective alternative for small- and medium-sized laboratories that cannot afford an ultracentrifuge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9711986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97119862022-12-01 A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples Li, Qun Yu, Fengting Song, Chuan Zhao, Hongxin Yan, Liting Xiao, Qing Lao, Xiaojie Yang, Siyuan Tang, Yunxia Xiao, Jiang Zhang, Fujie Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in LLV samples. METHODS: A series of clinical samples were diluted and amplified for genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to prove the performance of the LCR. The Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the mutations. HIV-1 subtypes and CRFs were determined using the COMET online tool. The overall success rate of genotyping was compared with ultracentrifugation combined with SS. Furthermore, the success rates at varied VL of the two concentration methods were evaluated, and the DRMs of diluted samples were compared with those undiluted samples. RESULTS: When LCR was used, the overall success rate was 90% (72/80) in the PR and RT regions and 60% (48/80) in the IN region. In addition, when HIV RNA was 1000 copies/ml, 400 copies/ml, 200 copies/ml, and 100 copies/ml, the success rates of PR and RT regions were 100%, 100%, 95%, and 65%, respectively, while the success rates of IN region were 85%, 60%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. We found that the sample DR-387A2 missed the E138A mutation, and mutations in other samples were consistent with undiluted samples using LCR. CONCLUSIONS: LCR will support monitoring DRMs in HIV-1 patients with LLV and can be an effective alternative for small- and medium-sized laboratories that cannot afford an ultracentrifuge. Hindawi 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9711986/ /pubmed/36467892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qun Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Qun Yu, Fengting Song, Chuan Zhao, Hongxin Yan, Liting Xiao, Qing Lao, Xiaojie Yang, Siyuan Tang, Yunxia Xiao, Jiang Zhang, Fujie A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title | A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title_full | A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title_fullStr | A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title_short | A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples |
title_sort | concentration method for hiv drug resistance testing in low-level viremia samples |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liqun aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yufengting aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT songchuan aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT zhaohongxin aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yanliting aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT xiaoqing aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT laoxiaojie aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yangsiyuan aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT tangyunxia aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT xiaojiang aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT zhangfujie aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT liqun concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yufengting concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT songchuan concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT zhaohongxin concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yanliting concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT xiaoqing concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT laoxiaojie concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT yangsiyuan concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT tangyunxia concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT xiaojiang concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples AT zhangfujie concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples |