Cargando…

A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples

BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qun, Yu, Fengting, Song, Chuan, Zhao, Hongxin, Yan, Liting, Xiao, Qing, Lao, Xiaojie, Yang, Siyuan, Tang, Yunxia, Xiao, Jiang, Zhang, Fujie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254
_version_ 1784841697283276800
author Li, Qun
Yu, Fengting
Song, Chuan
Zhao, Hongxin
Yan, Liting
Xiao, Qing
Lao, Xiaojie
Yang, Siyuan
Tang, Yunxia
Xiao, Jiang
Zhang, Fujie
author_facet Li, Qun
Yu, Fengting
Song, Chuan
Zhao, Hongxin
Yan, Liting
Xiao, Qing
Lao, Xiaojie
Yang, Siyuan
Tang, Yunxia
Xiao, Jiang
Zhang, Fujie
author_sort Li, Qun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in LLV samples. METHODS: A series of clinical samples were diluted and amplified for genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to prove the performance of the LCR. The Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the mutations. HIV-1 subtypes and CRFs were determined using the COMET online tool. The overall success rate of genotyping was compared with ultracentrifugation combined with SS. Furthermore, the success rates at varied VL of the two concentration methods were evaluated, and the DRMs of diluted samples were compared with those undiluted samples. RESULTS: When LCR was used, the overall success rate was 90% (72/80) in the PR and RT regions and 60% (48/80) in the IN region. In addition, when HIV RNA was 1000 copies/ml, 400 copies/ml, 200 copies/ml, and 100 copies/ml, the success rates of PR and RT regions were 100%, 100%, 95%, and 65%, respectively, while the success rates of IN region were 85%, 60%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. We found that the sample DR-387A2 missed the E138A mutation, and mutations in other samples were consistent with undiluted samples using LCR. CONCLUSIONS: LCR will support monitoring DRMs in HIV-1 patients with LLV and can be an effective alternative for small- and medium-sized laboratories that cannot afford an ultracentrifuge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9711986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97119862022-12-01 A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples Li, Qun Yu, Fengting Song, Chuan Zhao, Hongxin Yan, Liting Xiao, Qing Lao, Xiaojie Yang, Siyuan Tang, Yunxia Xiao, Jiang Zhang, Fujie Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug resistance testing in HIV-1 low-level viremia (LLV) samples is challenging yet critical. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of lentivirus concentration reagent (LCR) in combination with a validated Sanger sequencing (SS) for monitoring drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in LLV samples. METHODS: A series of clinical samples were diluted and amplified for genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to prove the performance of the LCR. The Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the mutations. HIV-1 subtypes and CRFs were determined using the COMET online tool. The overall success rate of genotyping was compared with ultracentrifugation combined with SS. Furthermore, the success rates at varied VL of the two concentration methods were evaluated, and the DRMs of diluted samples were compared with those undiluted samples. RESULTS: When LCR was used, the overall success rate was 90% (72/80) in the PR and RT regions and 60% (48/80) in the IN region. In addition, when HIV RNA was 1000 copies/ml, 400 copies/ml, 200 copies/ml, and 100 copies/ml, the success rates of PR and RT regions were 100%, 100%, 95%, and 65%, respectively, while the success rates of IN region were 85%, 60%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. We found that the sample DR-387A2 missed the E138A mutation, and mutations in other samples were consistent with undiluted samples using LCR. CONCLUSIONS: LCR will support monitoring DRMs in HIV-1 patients with LLV and can be an effective alternative for small- and medium-sized laboratories that cannot afford an ultracentrifuge. Hindawi 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9711986/ /pubmed/36467892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qun Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Qun
Yu, Fengting
Song, Chuan
Zhao, Hongxin
Yan, Liting
Xiao, Qing
Lao, Xiaojie
Yang, Siyuan
Tang, Yunxia
Xiao, Jiang
Zhang, Fujie
A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title_full A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title_fullStr A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title_full_unstemmed A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title_short A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
title_sort concentration method for hiv drug resistance testing in low-level viremia samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9711986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2100254
work_keys_str_mv AT liqun aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yufengting aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT songchuan aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT zhaohongxin aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yanliting aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT xiaoqing aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT laoxiaojie aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yangsiyuan aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT tangyunxia aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT xiaojiang aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT zhangfujie aconcentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT liqun concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yufengting concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT songchuan concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT zhaohongxin concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yanliting concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT xiaoqing concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT laoxiaojie concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT yangsiyuan concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT tangyunxia concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT xiaojiang concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples
AT zhangfujie concentrationmethodforhivdrugresistancetestinginlowlevelviremiasamples