Cargando…

A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting

OBJECTIVE: Although skilled goals of care (GOC) conversations are known to reduce aggressive futile end-of-life care, they have not been widely implemented nor standardized in the care of gynecologic malignancies. Clinicians express concern regarding patient readiness and willingness to participate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanolli, Nicole C., Gatta, Luke A., Fish, Laura, Falkovic, Margaret, Lorenzo, Amelia, Puechl, Allison M., Havrilesky, Laura J., Davidson, Brittany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0040
_version_ 1784841714285936640
author Zanolli, Nicole C.
Gatta, Luke A.
Fish, Laura
Falkovic, Margaret
Lorenzo, Amelia
Puechl, Allison M.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Davidson, Brittany
author_facet Zanolli, Nicole C.
Gatta, Luke A.
Fish, Laura
Falkovic, Margaret
Lorenzo, Amelia
Puechl, Allison M.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Davidson, Brittany
author_sort Zanolli, Nicole C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although skilled goals of care (GOC) conversations are known to reduce aggressive futile end-of-life care, they have not been widely implemented nor standardized in the care of gynecologic malignancies. Clinicians express concern regarding patient readiness and willingness to participate in these conversations, which may be a barrier to GOC discussions. METHODS: This is a qualitative study, conducted at an academic institution in the United States, of patients with gynecologic malignancies at high risk of death within six months and who had recently completed a GOC discussion with their oncology clinician during an ambulatory visit. Within 10 days of this conversation, patients were approached for potential participation in an hour-long semistructured interview. Patients enrolled in hospice or who were non-English speaking were excluded. Participants were enrolled until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed and coded using the five-stage thematic approach. RESULTS: Ten women were consented and participated in semistructured interviews, which occurred a median of 4 (range 1–18) days after the index GOC discussion. The median age was 64 (range 37–78), and the most common diagnosis (50%) was recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Four themes were identified: (1) delivery of the GOC conversation, (2) importance of prioritizing individual values, (3) involving family in decision making, and (4) openness to discussing discontinuation of anticancer treatment and hospice. Patients generally felt these GOC conversations were useful, providing a space to express their values and did not compromise the patient–clinician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seemed willing to engage in GOC conversations and were appreciative of their clinicians' communication skills. Often, they used this conversation as an opportunity to convey personal values affecting their care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9712054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97120542022-12-06 A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting Zanolli, Nicole C. Gatta, Luke A. Fish, Laura Falkovic, Margaret Lorenzo, Amelia Puechl, Allison M. Havrilesky, Laura J. Davidson, Brittany Palliat Med Rep Original Article OBJECTIVE: Although skilled goals of care (GOC) conversations are known to reduce aggressive futile end-of-life care, they have not been widely implemented nor standardized in the care of gynecologic malignancies. Clinicians express concern regarding patient readiness and willingness to participate in these conversations, which may be a barrier to GOC discussions. METHODS: This is a qualitative study, conducted at an academic institution in the United States, of patients with gynecologic malignancies at high risk of death within six months and who had recently completed a GOC discussion with their oncology clinician during an ambulatory visit. Within 10 days of this conversation, patients were approached for potential participation in an hour-long semistructured interview. Patients enrolled in hospice or who were non-English speaking were excluded. Participants were enrolled until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed and coded using the five-stage thematic approach. RESULTS: Ten women were consented and participated in semistructured interviews, which occurred a median of 4 (range 1–18) days after the index GOC discussion. The median age was 64 (range 37–78), and the most common diagnosis (50%) was recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Four themes were identified: (1) delivery of the GOC conversation, (2) importance of prioritizing individual values, (3) involving family in decision making, and (4) openness to discussing discontinuation of anticancer treatment and hospice. Patients generally felt these GOC conversations were useful, providing a space to express their values and did not compromise the patient–clinician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seemed willing to engage in GOC conversations and were appreciative of their clinicians' communication skills. Often, they used this conversation as an opportunity to convey personal values affecting their care. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9712054/ /pubmed/36479549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0040 Text en © Nicole C. Zanolli et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zanolli, Nicole C.
Gatta, Luke A.
Fish, Laura
Falkovic, Margaret
Lorenzo, Amelia
Puechl, Allison M.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Davidson, Brittany
A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title_full A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title_fullStr A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title_short A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
title_sort qualitative assessment of patient experience following systematic implementation of goals of care conversations in the ambulatory gynecologic oncology setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0040
work_keys_str_mv AT zanollinicolec aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT gattalukea aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT fishlaura aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT falkovicmargaret aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT lorenzoamelia aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT puechlallisonm aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT havrileskylauraj aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT davidsonbrittany aqualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT zanollinicolec qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT gattalukea qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT fishlaura qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT falkovicmargaret qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT lorenzoamelia qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT puechlallisonm qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT havrileskylauraj qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting
AT davidsonbrittany qualitativeassessmentofpatientexperiencefollowingsystematicimplementationofgoalsofcareconversationsintheambulatorygynecologiconcologysetting