Cargando…
Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7 |
_version_ | 1784841725385113600 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yudi Wu, Junying Qin, Tiejun Xu, Zefeng Qu, Shiqiang Pan, Lijuan Li, Bing Wang, Huijun Zhang, Peihong Yan, Xin Gong, Jingye Gao, Qingyan Gale, Robert Peter Xiao, Zhijian |
author_facet | Zhang, Yudi Wu, Junying Qin, Tiejun Xu, Zefeng Qu, Shiqiang Pan, Lijuan Li, Bing Wang, Huijun Zhang, Peihong Yan, Xin Gong, Jingye Gao, Qingyan Gale, Robert Peter Xiao, Zhijian |
author_sort | Zhang, Yudi |
collection | PubMed |
description | We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-classified as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 9 subjects previously classified as MDS-U were re-classified to clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS). The remaining 813 subjects were diagnosed as: MDS-5q (N = 11 [1%]), MDS-SF3B1 (N = 70 [9%]), MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]), MDS-LB (N = 293 [36%]), MDS-h (N = 80 [10%]), MDS-IB1 (N = 161 [20%]), MDS-IB2 (N = 103 [13%]) and MDS-f (N = 42 [5%]) and MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]). 34 of these subjects came from the 53 (64%) MDS-biTP53 previously diagnosed as MDS-EB. Median survival of subjects classified as MDS using the WHO 2022 criteria was 45 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 34, 56 months). Subjects re-classified as MDS-biTP53 and MDS-f had significantly briefer median survivals compared with other MDS sub-types (10 months, [8, 12 months] and 15 months [8, 23 months]). In conclusion, our analyses support the refinements made in the WHO 2022 proposal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9712101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97121012022-12-02 Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms Zhang, Yudi Wu, Junying Qin, Tiejun Xu, Zefeng Qu, Shiqiang Pan, Lijuan Li, Bing Wang, Huijun Zhang, Peihong Yan, Xin Gong, Jingye Gao, Qingyan Gale, Robert Peter Xiao, Zhijian Leukemia Article We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-classified as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 9 subjects previously classified as MDS-U were re-classified to clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS). The remaining 813 subjects were diagnosed as: MDS-5q (N = 11 [1%]), MDS-SF3B1 (N = 70 [9%]), MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]), MDS-LB (N = 293 [36%]), MDS-h (N = 80 [10%]), MDS-IB1 (N = 161 [20%]), MDS-IB2 (N = 103 [13%]) and MDS-f (N = 42 [5%]) and MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]). 34 of these subjects came from the 53 (64%) MDS-biTP53 previously diagnosed as MDS-EB. Median survival of subjects classified as MDS using the WHO 2022 criteria was 45 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 34, 56 months). Subjects re-classified as MDS-biTP53 and MDS-f had significantly briefer median survivals compared with other MDS sub-types (10 months, [8, 12 months] and 15 months [8, 23 months]). In conclusion, our analyses support the refinements made in the WHO 2022 proposal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712101/ /pubmed/36224330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yudi Wu, Junying Qin, Tiejun Xu, Zefeng Qu, Shiqiang Pan, Lijuan Li, Bing Wang, Huijun Zhang, Peihong Yan, Xin Gong, Jingye Gao, Qingyan Gale, Robert Peter Xiao, Zhijian Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title | Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_full | Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_short | Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_sort | comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the world health organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyudi comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT wujunying comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT qintiejun comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT xuzefeng comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT qushiqiang comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT panlijuan comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT libing comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT wanghuijun comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT zhangpeihong comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT yanxin comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT gongjingye comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT gaoqingyan comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT galerobertpeter comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms AT xiaozhijian comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms |