Cargando…

Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms

We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yudi, Wu, Junying, Qin, Tiejun, Xu, Zefeng, Qu, Shiqiang, Pan, Lijuan, Li, Bing, Wang, Huijun, Zhang, Peihong, Yan, Xin, Gong, Jingye, Gao, Qingyan, Gale, Robert Peter, Xiao, Zhijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7
_version_ 1784841725385113600
author Zhang, Yudi
Wu, Junying
Qin, Tiejun
Xu, Zefeng
Qu, Shiqiang
Pan, Lijuan
Li, Bing
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Peihong
Yan, Xin
Gong, Jingye
Gao, Qingyan
Gale, Robert Peter
Xiao, Zhijian
author_facet Zhang, Yudi
Wu, Junying
Qin, Tiejun
Xu, Zefeng
Qu, Shiqiang
Pan, Lijuan
Li, Bing
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Peihong
Yan, Xin
Gong, Jingye
Gao, Qingyan
Gale, Robert Peter
Xiao, Zhijian
author_sort Zhang, Yudi
collection PubMed
description We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-classified as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 9 subjects previously classified as MDS-U were re-classified to clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS). The remaining 813 subjects were diagnosed as: MDS-5q (N = 11 [1%]), MDS-SF3B1 (N = 70 [9%]), MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]), MDS-LB (N = 293 [36%]), MDS-h (N = 80 [10%]), MDS-IB1 (N = 161 [20%]), MDS-IB2 (N = 103 [13%]) and MDS-f (N = 42 [5%]) and MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]). 34 of these subjects came from the 53 (64%) MDS-biTP53 previously diagnosed as MDS-EB. Median survival of subjects classified as MDS using the WHO 2022 criteria was 45 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 34, 56 months). Subjects re-classified as MDS-biTP53 and MDS-f had significantly briefer median survivals compared with other MDS sub-types (10 months, [8, 12 months] and 15 months [8, 23 months]). In conclusion, our analyses support the refinements made in the WHO 2022 proposal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9712101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97121012022-12-02 Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms Zhang, Yudi Wu, Junying Qin, Tiejun Xu, Zefeng Qu, Shiqiang Pan, Lijuan Li, Bing Wang, Huijun Zhang, Peihong Yan, Xin Gong, Jingye Gao, Qingyan Gale, Robert Peter Xiao, Zhijian Leukemia Article We used data from 852 consecutive subjects with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosed according to the 2016 (revised 4th) World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to evaluate the 2022 (5th) edition WHO classification of MDS. 30 subjects previously classified as MDS with an NPM1 mutation were re-classified as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 9 subjects previously classified as MDS-U were re-classified to clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS). The remaining 813 subjects were diagnosed as: MDS-5q (N = 11 [1%]), MDS-SF3B1 (N = 70 [9%]), MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]), MDS-LB (N = 293 [36%]), MDS-h (N = 80 [10%]), MDS-IB1 (N = 161 [20%]), MDS-IB2 (N = 103 [13%]) and MDS-f (N = 42 [5%]) and MDS-biTP53 (N = 53 [7%]). 34 of these subjects came from the 53 (64%) MDS-biTP53 previously diagnosed as MDS-EB. Median survival of subjects classified as MDS using the WHO 2022 criteria was 45 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 34, 56 months). Subjects re-classified as MDS-biTP53 and MDS-f had significantly briefer median survivals compared with other MDS sub-types (10 months, [8, 12 months] and 15 months [8, 23 months]). In conclusion, our analyses support the refinements made in the WHO 2022 proposal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712101/ /pubmed/36224330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Yudi
Wu, Junying
Qin, Tiejun
Xu, Zefeng
Qu, Shiqiang
Pan, Lijuan
Li, Bing
Wang, Huijun
Zhang, Peihong
Yan, Xin
Gong, Jingye
Gao, Qingyan
Gale, Robert Peter
Xiao, Zhijian
Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_full Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_fullStr Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_short Comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_sort comparison of the revised 4th (2016) and 5th (2022) editions of the world health organization classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01718-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyudi comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT wujunying comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT qintiejun comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT xuzefeng comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT qushiqiang comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT panlijuan comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT libing comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT wanghuijun comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT zhangpeihong comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT yanxin comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT gongjingye comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT gaoqingyan comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT galerobertpeter comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms
AT xiaozhijian comparisonoftherevised4th2016and5th2022editionsoftheworldhealthorganizationclassificationofmyelodysplasticneoplasms