Cargando…

Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guijarro-Belmar, Alba, Varone, Anna, Baltzer, Martin Rugema, Kataria, Saurav, Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi, Watzlawick, Ralf, Sena, Emily, Cunningham, Catriona J., Rajnicek, Ann M., Macleod, Malcolm, Huang, Wenlong, Currie, Gillian L., McCann, Sarah K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z
_version_ 1784841729976827904
author Guijarro-Belmar, Alba
Varone, Anna
Baltzer, Martin Rugema
Kataria, Saurav
Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi
Watzlawick, Ralf
Sena, Emily
Cunningham, Catriona J.
Rajnicek, Ann M.
Macleod, Malcolm
Huang, Wenlong
Currie, Gillian L.
McCann, Sarah K.
author_facet Guijarro-Belmar, Alba
Varone, Anna
Baltzer, Martin Rugema
Kataria, Saurav
Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi
Watzlawick, Ralf
Sena, Emily
Cunningham, Catriona J.
Rajnicek, Ann M.
Macleod, Malcolm
Huang, Wenlong
Currie, Gillian L.
McCann, Sarah K.
author_sort Guijarro-Belmar, Alba
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau(2), I(2) and R(2) statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods. RESULTS: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3–30.3; n = 102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6 SD (95% CI 1.2–2 SD; n = 117) in comparison with injury only controls. CONCLUSION: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9712119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97121192022-12-02 Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature Guijarro-Belmar, Alba Varone, Anna Baltzer, Martin Rugema Kataria, Saurav Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi Watzlawick, Ralf Sena, Emily Cunningham, Catriona J. Rajnicek, Ann M. Macleod, Malcolm Huang, Wenlong Currie, Gillian L. McCann, Sarah K. Spinal Cord Review Article STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau(2), I(2) and R(2) statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods. RESULTS: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3–30.3; n = 102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6 SD (95% CI 1.2–2 SD; n = 117) in comparison with injury only controls. CONCLUSION: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712119/ /pubmed/35606413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Guijarro-Belmar, Alba
Varone, Anna
Baltzer, Martin Rugema
Kataria, Saurav
Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi
Watzlawick, Ralf
Sena, Emily
Cunningham, Catriona J.
Rajnicek, Ann M.
Macleod, Malcolm
Huang, Wenlong
Currie, Gillian L.
McCann, Sarah K.
Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title_full Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title_fullStr Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title_short Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
title_sort effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guijarrobelmaralba effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT varoneanna effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT baltzermartinrugema effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT katariasaurav effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT tanriverayderezgi effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT watzlawickralf effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT senaemily effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT cunninghamcatrionaj effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT rajnicekannm effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT macleodmalcolm effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT huangwenlong effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT curriegillianl effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature
AT mccannsarahk effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature