Cargando…
Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z |
_version_ | 1784841729976827904 |
---|---|
author | Guijarro-Belmar, Alba Varone, Anna Baltzer, Martin Rugema Kataria, Saurav Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi Watzlawick, Ralf Sena, Emily Cunningham, Catriona J. Rajnicek, Ann M. Macleod, Malcolm Huang, Wenlong Currie, Gillian L. McCann, Sarah K. |
author_facet | Guijarro-Belmar, Alba Varone, Anna Baltzer, Martin Rugema Kataria, Saurav Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi Watzlawick, Ralf Sena, Emily Cunningham, Catriona J. Rajnicek, Ann M. Macleod, Malcolm Huang, Wenlong Currie, Gillian L. McCann, Sarah K. |
author_sort | Guijarro-Belmar, Alba |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau(2), I(2) and R(2) statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods. RESULTS: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3–30.3; n = 102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6 SD (95% CI 1.2–2 SD; n = 117) in comparison with injury only controls. CONCLUSION: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9712119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97121192022-12-02 Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature Guijarro-Belmar, Alba Varone, Anna Baltzer, Martin Rugema Kataria, Saurav Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi Watzlawick, Ralf Sena, Emily Cunningham, Catriona J. Rajnicek, Ann M. Macleod, Malcolm Huang, Wenlong Currie, Gillian L. McCann, Sarah K. Spinal Cord Review Article STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau(2), I(2) and R(2) statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot–based methods. RESULTS: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3–30.3; n = 102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6 SD (95% CI 1.2–2 SD; n = 117) in comparison with injury only controls. CONCLUSION: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712119/ /pubmed/35606413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Guijarro-Belmar, Alba Varone, Anna Baltzer, Martin Rugema Kataria, Saurav Tanriver-Ayder, Ezgi Watzlawick, Ralf Sena, Emily Cunningham, Catriona J. Rajnicek, Ann M. Macleod, Malcolm Huang, Wenlong Currie, Gillian L. McCann, Sarah K. Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title | Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title_full | Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title_short | Effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
title_sort | effectiveness of biomaterial-based combination strategies for spinal cord repair – a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00811-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guijarrobelmaralba effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT varoneanna effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT baltzermartinrugema effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT katariasaurav effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT tanriverayderezgi effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT watzlawickralf effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT senaemily effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT cunninghamcatrionaj effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT rajnicekannm effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT macleodmalcolm effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT huangwenlong effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT curriegillianl effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature AT mccannsarahk effectivenessofbiomaterialbasedcombinationstrategiesforspinalcordrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpreclinicalliterature |