Cargando…

Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate evidence on prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in clinical stage I nonseminoma patients other than lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in the biomedical databases Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane Central Regist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zengerling, Friedemann, Beyersdorff, Dirk, Busch, Jonas, Heinzelbecker, Julia, Pfister, David, Ruf, Christian, Winter, Christian, Albers, Peter, Kliesch, Sabine, Schmidt, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7
_version_ 1784841751922475008
author Zengerling, Friedemann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Busch, Jonas
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Pfister, David
Ruf, Christian
Winter, Christian
Albers, Peter
Kliesch, Sabine
Schmidt, Stefanie
author_facet Zengerling, Friedemann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Busch, Jonas
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Pfister, David
Ruf, Christian
Winter, Christian
Albers, Peter
Kliesch, Sabine
Schmidt, Stefanie
author_sort Zengerling, Friedemann
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate evidence on prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in clinical stage I nonseminoma patients other than lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in the biomedical databases Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (search period January 2010 to February 2021) for full text publications in English and German language, reporting on retro- or prospectively assessed prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded eleven studies reporting on 20 potential prognostic factors. Results are based on cohort studies of mostly moderate to low quality. Five out of eight studies found a significant association of embryonal carcinoma (EC) in the primary tumor with relapse. Among the different risk definitions of embryonal carcinoma (presence, predominance, pure), presence of EC alone seems to be sufficient for prognostification. Interesting results were found for rete testis invasion, predominant yolk sac tumor, T-stage and history of cryptorchidism, but the sparse data situation does not justify their clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: No additional factors that meet the prognostic value of LVI, especially when determined by immunohistochemistry, could be identified through our systematic search. The presence of EC might serve as a second, subordinate prognostic factor for clinical use as the data situation is less abundant than the one of LVI. Further efforts are necessary to optimize the use of these two prognostic factors and to evaluate and validate further potential factors with promising preliminary data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9712284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97122842022-12-02 Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review Zengerling, Friedemann Beyersdorff, Dirk Busch, Jonas Heinzelbecker, Julia Pfister, David Ruf, Christian Winter, Christian Albers, Peter Kliesch, Sabine Schmidt, Stefanie World J Urol Topic Paper OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate evidence on prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in clinical stage I nonseminoma patients other than lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in the biomedical databases Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (search period January 2010 to February 2021) for full text publications in English and German language, reporting on retro- or prospectively assessed prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded eleven studies reporting on 20 potential prognostic factors. Results are based on cohort studies of mostly moderate to low quality. Five out of eight studies found a significant association of embryonal carcinoma (EC) in the primary tumor with relapse. Among the different risk definitions of embryonal carcinoma (presence, predominance, pure), presence of EC alone seems to be sufficient for prognostification. Interesting results were found for rete testis invasion, predominant yolk sac tumor, T-stage and history of cryptorchidism, but the sparse data situation does not justify their clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: No additional factors that meet the prognostic value of LVI, especially when determined by immunohistochemistry, could be identified through our systematic search. The presence of EC might serve as a second, subordinate prognostic factor for clinical use as the data situation is less abundant than the one of LVI. Further efforts are necessary to optimize the use of these two prognostic factors and to evaluate and validate further potential factors with promising preliminary data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712284/ /pubmed/35906286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Topic Paper
Zengerling, Friedemann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Busch, Jonas
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Pfister, David
Ruf, Christian
Winter, Christian
Albers, Peter
Kliesch, Sabine
Schmidt, Stefanie
Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title_full Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title_fullStr Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title_short Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
title_sort prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage i nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review
topic Topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zengerlingfriedemann prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT beyersdorffdirk prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT buschjonas prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT heinzelbeckerjulia prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT pfisterdavid prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT rufchristian prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT winterchristian prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT alberspeter prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT klieschsabine prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview
AT schmidtstefanie prognosticfactorsinpatientswithclinicalstageinonseminomabeyondlymphovascularinvasionasystematicreview