Cargando…
Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies published from January 2010 until February 2021 were included....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5 |
_version_ | 1784841756108390400 |
---|---|
author | Heinzelbecker, Julia Schmidt, Stefanie Lackner, Julia Busch, Jonas Bokemeyer, Carsten Classen, Johannes Dieing, Annette Hakenberg, Oliver Krege, Susanne Papachristofilou, Alexandros Pfister, David Ruf, Christian Schmelz, Hans Schmidberger, Heinz Souchon, Rainer Winter, Christian Zengerling, Friedemann Kliesch, Sabine Albers, Peter Oing, Christoph |
author_facet | Heinzelbecker, Julia Schmidt, Stefanie Lackner, Julia Busch, Jonas Bokemeyer, Carsten Classen, Johannes Dieing, Annette Hakenberg, Oliver Krege, Susanne Papachristofilou, Alexandros Pfister, David Ruf, Christian Schmelz, Hans Schmidberger, Heinz Souchon, Rainer Winter, Christian Zengerling, Friedemann Kliesch, Sabine Albers, Peter Oing, Christoph |
author_sort | Heinzelbecker, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies published from January 2010 until February 2021 were included. Search items included: seminoma, CS IIA, CS IIB and therapy. Outcome parameters were relapse rate (RR), relapse-free (RFS), overall and cancer-specific survival (OS, CSS). Additionally, acute and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (SMs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven comparative studies (one prospective and six retrospective) were identified with a total of 5049 patients (CS IIA: 2840, CS IIB: 2209). The applied treatment modalities were radiotherapy (RT) (n = 3049; CS IIA: 1888, CSIIB: 1006, unknown: 155) and chemotherapy (CT) or no RT (n = 2000; CS IIA: 797, CS IIB: 1074, unknown: 129). In CS IIA, RRs ranged from 0% to 4.8% for RT and 0% for CT. Concerning CS IIB RRs of 9.5%–21.1% for RT and of 0%–14.2% for CT have been reported. 5-year OS ranged from 90 to 100%. Only two studies reported on treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: RT and CT are the most commonly applied treatments in CS IIA/B seminoma. In CS IIA seminomas, RRs after RT and CT are similar. However, in CS IIB, CT seems to be more effective. Survival rates of CS IIA/B seminomas are excellent. Consequently, long-term toxicities and SMs are important survivorship issues. Alternative treatment approaches, e.g., retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or dose-reduced sequential CT/RT are currently under prospective investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9712301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97123012022-12-02 Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review Heinzelbecker, Julia Schmidt, Stefanie Lackner, Julia Busch, Jonas Bokemeyer, Carsten Classen, Johannes Dieing, Annette Hakenberg, Oliver Krege, Susanne Papachristofilou, Alexandros Pfister, David Ruf, Christian Schmelz, Hans Schmidberger, Heinz Souchon, Rainer Winter, Christian Zengerling, Friedemann Kliesch, Sabine Albers, Peter Oing, Christoph World J Urol Topic Paper PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies published from January 2010 until February 2021 were included. Search items included: seminoma, CS IIA, CS IIB and therapy. Outcome parameters were relapse rate (RR), relapse-free (RFS), overall and cancer-specific survival (OS, CSS). Additionally, acute and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (SMs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven comparative studies (one prospective and six retrospective) were identified with a total of 5049 patients (CS IIA: 2840, CS IIB: 2209). The applied treatment modalities were radiotherapy (RT) (n = 3049; CS IIA: 1888, CSIIB: 1006, unknown: 155) and chemotherapy (CT) or no RT (n = 2000; CS IIA: 797, CS IIB: 1074, unknown: 129). In CS IIA, RRs ranged from 0% to 4.8% for RT and 0% for CT. Concerning CS IIB RRs of 9.5%–21.1% for RT and of 0%–14.2% for CT have been reported. 5-year OS ranged from 90 to 100%. Only two studies reported on treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: RT and CT are the most commonly applied treatments in CS IIA/B seminoma. In CS IIA seminomas, RRs after RT and CT are similar. However, in CS IIB, CT seems to be more effective. Survival rates of CS IIA/B seminomas are excellent. Consequently, long-term toxicities and SMs are important survivorship issues. Alternative treatment approaches, e.g., retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or dose-reduced sequential CT/RT are currently under prospective investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712301/ /pubmed/34779882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Topic Paper Heinzelbecker, Julia Schmidt, Stefanie Lackner, Julia Busch, Jonas Bokemeyer, Carsten Classen, Johannes Dieing, Annette Hakenberg, Oliver Krege, Susanne Papachristofilou, Alexandros Pfister, David Ruf, Christian Schmelz, Hans Schmidberger, Heinz Souchon, Rainer Winter, Christian Zengerling, Friedemann Kliesch, Sabine Albers, Peter Oing, Christoph Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title | Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title_full | Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title_short | Therapy of clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma: a systematic review |
title_sort | therapy of clinical stage iia and iib seminoma: a systematic review |
topic | Topic Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinzelbeckerjulia therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT schmidtstefanie therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT lacknerjulia therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT buschjonas therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT bokemeyercarsten therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT classenjohannes therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT dieingannette therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT hakenbergoliver therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT kregesusanne therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT papachristofiloualexandros therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT pfisterdavid therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT rufchristian therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT schmelzhans therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT schmidbergerheinz therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT souchonrainer therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT winterchristian therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT zengerlingfriedemann therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT klieschsabine therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT alberspeter therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview AT oingchristoph therapyofclinicalstageiiaandiibseminomaasystematicreview |