Cargando…
The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis
PURPOSE: Traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS) is a complex, dynamic process and, no consensual definition of THS is available. This study aims (1) to explore existing definitions of traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS), (2) to identify essential components of these definitions and (3) to illustrate in a p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01998-9 |
_version_ | 1784841758428889088 |
---|---|
author | James, Arthur Abback, Paer-Selim Pasquier, Pierre Ausset, Sylvain Duranteau, Jacques Hoffmann, Clément Gauss, Tobias Hamada, Sophie Rym |
author_facet | James, Arthur Abback, Paer-Selim Pasquier, Pierre Ausset, Sylvain Duranteau, Jacques Hoffmann, Clément Gauss, Tobias Hamada, Sophie Rym |
author_sort | James, Arthur |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS) is a complex, dynamic process and, no consensual definition of THS is available. This study aims (1) to explore existing definitions of traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS), (2) to identify essential components of these definitions and (3) to illustrate in a pragmatic way the consequences of applying five of these definitions to a trauma registry. METHODS: We conducted (1) a scoping review to identify the definitions used for traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS); (2) an international experts survey to rank by relevance a selection of components extracted from these definitions and (3) a registry-based analysis where several candidate definitions were tested in a large trauma registry to evaluate how the use of different definitions affected baseline characteristics, resources use and patient outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included revealing 52 distinct definitions. The most frequently used was “a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than or equal to 70 mmHg or between 71 and 90 mmHg if the heart rate is greater than or equal to 108 beats per min”. The expert panel identified base excess, blood lactate concentration, SBP and shock index as the most relevant physiological components to define THS. Five definitions of THS were tested and highlighted significant differences across groups on important outcomes such as the proportion of massive transfusion, the need for surgery, in-hospital length of stay or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a large heterogeneity in the definitions of THS suggesting a need for standardization. Five candidate definitions were identified in a three-step process to illustrate how each shapes study cohort composition and impacts outcome. The results inform research stakeholders in the choice of a consensual definition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01998-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9712310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97123102022-12-02 The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis James, Arthur Abback, Paer-Selim Pasquier, Pierre Ausset, Sylvain Duranteau, Jacques Hoffmann, Clément Gauss, Tobias Hamada, Sophie Rym Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS) is a complex, dynamic process and, no consensual definition of THS is available. This study aims (1) to explore existing definitions of traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS), (2) to identify essential components of these definitions and (3) to illustrate in a pragmatic way the consequences of applying five of these definitions to a trauma registry. METHODS: We conducted (1) a scoping review to identify the definitions used for traumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS); (2) an international experts survey to rank by relevance a selection of components extracted from these definitions and (3) a registry-based analysis where several candidate definitions were tested in a large trauma registry to evaluate how the use of different definitions affected baseline characteristics, resources use and patient outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included revealing 52 distinct definitions. The most frequently used was “a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than or equal to 70 mmHg or between 71 and 90 mmHg if the heart rate is greater than or equal to 108 beats per min”. The expert panel identified base excess, blood lactate concentration, SBP and shock index as the most relevant physiological components to define THS. Five definitions of THS were tested and highlighted significant differences across groups on important outcomes such as the proportion of massive transfusion, the need for surgery, in-hospital length of stay or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a large heterogeneity in the definitions of THS suggesting a need for standardization. Five candidate definitions were identified in a three-step process to illustrate how each shapes study cohort composition and impacts outcome. The results inform research stakeholders in the choice of a consensual definition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01998-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712310/ /pubmed/35732811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01998-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article James, Arthur Abback, Paer-Selim Pasquier, Pierre Ausset, Sylvain Duranteau, Jacques Hoffmann, Clément Gauss, Tobias Hamada, Sophie Rym The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title | The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title_full | The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title_short | The conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
title_sort | conundrum of the definition of haemorrhagic shock: a pragmatic exploration based on a scoping review, experts’ survey and a cohort analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01998-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesarthur theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT abbackpaerselim theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT pasquierpierre theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT aussetsylvain theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT duranteaujacques theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT hoffmannclement theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT gausstobias theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT hamadasophierym theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT theconundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT jamesarthur conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT abbackpaerselim conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT pasquierpierre conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT aussetsylvain conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT duranteaujacques conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT hoffmannclement conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT gausstobias conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT hamadasophierym conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis AT conundrumofthedefinitionofhaemorrhagicshockapragmaticexplorationbasedonascopingreviewexpertssurveyandacohortanalysis |