Cargando…

Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences

PURPOSE: To gain insight into anatomical variations between sexes and different age groups in intraluminal distances and anatomical landmarks for correct insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) without fluoroscopic confirmation. MATERIALS: All non-trauma patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger, Vrancken, Suzanne, van Dongen, Thijs Theodorus Cornelis Fransiscus, Wamsteker, Tom, Rasmussen, Todd, Hoencamp, Rigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35794255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02033-7
_version_ 1784841770823057408
author van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger
Vrancken, Suzanne
van Dongen, Thijs Theodorus Cornelis Fransiscus
Wamsteker, Tom
Rasmussen, Todd
Hoencamp, Rigo
author_facet van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger
Vrancken, Suzanne
van Dongen, Thijs Theodorus Cornelis Fransiscus
Wamsteker, Tom
Rasmussen, Todd
Hoencamp, Rigo
author_sort van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To gain insight into anatomical variations between sexes and different age groups in intraluminal distances and anatomical landmarks for correct insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) without fluoroscopic confirmation. MATERIALS: All non-trauma patients receiving a computed tomography angiography (CT-A) scan of the aorta, iliac bifurcation and common femoral arteries from 2017 to 2019 were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: Central luminal line distances from the common femoral artery (CFA) to the aortic occlusion zones were measured and diameters of mid zone I, II and III were registered. Anatomical landmarks and correlations were assessed. A simulated REBOA placement was performed using the Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (JTSCPG). RESULTS: In total, 250 patients were included. Central luminal line (CLL) measurements from mid CFA to aortic bifurcation (p = 0.000), CLL measurements from CFA to mid zone I, II and III (p = 0.000) and zone I length (p = 0.000) showed longer lengths in men. The length of zone I and III (p = 0.000), CLL distance measurements from the right CFA to mid zone I (p = 0.000) and II (p = 0.013) and aortic diameters measured at mid zone I, II and III increased in higher age groups (p = 0.000). Using the JTSCPG guideline, successful deployment occurred in 95/250 (38.0%) in zone III and 199/250 (79.6%) in zone I. Correlation between mid-sternum and zone I is 100%. Small volume aortic occlusion balloons (AOB) have poor occlusion rates in zone I (0–2.8%) and III (4.4–34.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Men and older age groups have longer CLL distances to zone I and III and introduction depths of AOB must be adjusted. The risk of not landing in zone III with standard introduction depths is high and balloon position for zone III REBOA is preferably confirmed using fluoroscopy. Mid-sternum can be used as a landmark in all patient groups for zone I. In older patients, balloon catheters with larger inflation volumes must be considered for aortic occlusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9712362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97123622022-12-02 Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger Vrancken, Suzanne van Dongen, Thijs Theodorus Cornelis Fransiscus Wamsteker, Tom Rasmussen, Todd Hoencamp, Rigo Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To gain insight into anatomical variations between sexes and different age groups in intraluminal distances and anatomical landmarks for correct insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) without fluoroscopic confirmation. MATERIALS: All non-trauma patients receiving a computed tomography angiography (CT-A) scan of the aorta, iliac bifurcation and common femoral arteries from 2017 to 2019 were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: Central luminal line distances from the common femoral artery (CFA) to the aortic occlusion zones were measured and diameters of mid zone I, II and III were registered. Anatomical landmarks and correlations were assessed. A simulated REBOA placement was performed using the Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (JTSCPG). RESULTS: In total, 250 patients were included. Central luminal line (CLL) measurements from mid CFA to aortic bifurcation (p = 0.000), CLL measurements from CFA to mid zone I, II and III (p = 0.000) and zone I length (p = 0.000) showed longer lengths in men. The length of zone I and III (p = 0.000), CLL distance measurements from the right CFA to mid zone I (p = 0.000) and II (p = 0.013) and aortic diameters measured at mid zone I, II and III increased in higher age groups (p = 0.000). Using the JTSCPG guideline, successful deployment occurred in 95/250 (38.0%) in zone III and 199/250 (79.6%) in zone I. Correlation between mid-sternum and zone I is 100%. Small volume aortic occlusion balloons (AOB) have poor occlusion rates in zone I (0–2.8%) and III (4.4–34.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Men and older age groups have longer CLL distances to zone I and III and introduction depths of AOB must be adjusted. The risk of not landing in zone III with standard introduction depths is high and balloon position for zone III REBOA is preferably confirmed using fluoroscopy. Mid-sternum can be used as a landmark in all patient groups for zone I. In older patients, balloon catheters with larger inflation volumes must be considered for aortic occlusion. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9712362/ /pubmed/35794255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02033-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van der Burg, Boke Linso Sjirk Borger
Vrancken, Suzanne
van Dongen, Thijs Theodorus Cornelis Fransiscus
Wamsteker, Tom
Rasmussen, Todd
Hoencamp, Rigo
Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title_full Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title_fullStr Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title_short Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
title_sort comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35794255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02033-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderburgbokelinsosjirkborger comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences
AT vranckensuzanne comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences
AT vandongenthijstheodoruscornelisfransiscus comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences
AT wamstekertom comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences
AT rasmussentodd comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences
AT hoencamprigo comparisonofaorticzonesforendovascularbleedingcontrolageandsexdifferences