Cargando…

Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial

AIMS & BACKGROUND: Pilocarpine is an accepted treatment for xerostomia, but limited research has been conducted on the oral, topical form. The present study aimed to compare the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash on xerostomic participants. METHODS: In this double-blind clinical trial stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motamed, Babak, Alaee, Arezoo, Azizi, Arash, Jahandar, Hoda, Fard, Mohammad Javad Kharazi, Jafari, Aryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02576-6
_version_ 1784841943422861312
author Motamed, Babak
Alaee, Arezoo
Azizi, Arash
Jahandar, Hoda
Fard, Mohammad Javad Kharazi
Jafari, Aryan
author_facet Motamed, Babak
Alaee, Arezoo
Azizi, Arash
Jahandar, Hoda
Fard, Mohammad Javad Kharazi
Jafari, Aryan
author_sort Motamed, Babak
collection PubMed
description AIMS & BACKGROUND: Pilocarpine is an accepted treatment for xerostomia, but limited research has been conducted on the oral, topical form. The present study aimed to compare the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash on xerostomic participants. METHODS: In this double-blind clinical trial study, 48 subjects with xerostomia were randomly divided into three groups to measure the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine and placebo mouthwashes on saliva levels. The amount of saliva in the 1st and 14th days was measured at 0, 45, 60, and 75 mins, while participants used their mouthwash three times a day for 14 days. On the 1st and 14th days, they filled out the information forms on xerostomia and the medicine’s side effects before and after the intervention. RESULTS: On the 1st day, the mean salivary flow at 45, 60, and 75 mins in the 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash were significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p < 0.05). On the 14th day, the mean salivary flow time at 45 mins in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p = 0.007). Furthermore, the mean salivary flow at 60 and 75 mins in the 2% (p < 0.001) and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p = 0.028) was significantly higher than in the placebo group. Moreover, the salivary flow in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than the 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p < 0.05) during these two times. No side effects were observed in any of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that 5 ml of 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash for 2 weeks increased salivary flow in xerostomic participants compared to placebo without any side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97131172022-12-01 Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial Motamed, Babak Alaee, Arezoo Azizi, Arash Jahandar, Hoda Fard, Mohammad Javad Kharazi Jafari, Aryan BMC Oral Health Research AIMS & BACKGROUND: Pilocarpine is an accepted treatment for xerostomia, but limited research has been conducted on the oral, topical form. The present study aimed to compare the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash on xerostomic participants. METHODS: In this double-blind clinical trial study, 48 subjects with xerostomia were randomly divided into three groups to measure the effects of 1 and 2% pilocarpine and placebo mouthwashes on saliva levels. The amount of saliva in the 1st and 14th days was measured at 0, 45, 60, and 75 mins, while participants used their mouthwash three times a day for 14 days. On the 1st and 14th days, they filled out the information forms on xerostomia and the medicine’s side effects before and after the intervention. RESULTS: On the 1st day, the mean salivary flow at 45, 60, and 75 mins in the 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash were significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p < 0.05). On the 14th day, the mean salivary flow time at 45 mins in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than in the placebo mouthwash group (p = 0.007). Furthermore, the mean salivary flow at 60 and 75 mins in the 2% (p < 0.001) and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p = 0.028) was significantly higher than in the placebo group. Moreover, the salivary flow in the 2% pilocarpine mouthwash group was significantly higher than the 1% pilocarpine mouthwash (p < 0.05) during these two times. No side effects were observed in any of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that 5 ml of 2 and 1% pilocarpine mouthwash for 2 weeks increased salivary flow in xerostomic participants compared to placebo without any side effects. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9713117/ /pubmed/36457091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02576-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Motamed, Babak
Alaee, Arezoo
Azizi, Arash
Jahandar, Hoda
Fard, Mohammad Javad Kharazi
Jafari, Aryan
Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02576-6
work_keys_str_mv AT motamedbabak comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT alaeearezoo comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT aziziarash comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jahandarhoda comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fardmohammadjavadkharazi comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jafariaryan comparisonofthe1and2pilocarpinemouthwashinaxerostomicpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial