Cargando…

Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting

BACKGROUND: The objective of our investigation was to better understand barriers to implementation of self-administered antigen screening testing for SARS-CoV-2 at institutions of higher education (IHE). METHODS: Using the Quidel QuickVue At-Home COVID-19 Test, 1347 IHE students and staff were asked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinker, Sarah C., Prince-Guerra, Jessica L., Vermandere, Kelly, Gettings, Jenna, Drenzik, Cherie, Voccio, Gary, Parrott, Tonia, Drobeniuc, Jan, Hayden, Tonya, Briggs, Stephen, Heida, Debbie, Thornburg, Natalie, Barrios, Lisa C., Neatherlin, John C., Madni, Sabrina, Rasberry, Catherine N., Swanson, Kenneth D., Tamin, Azaibi, Harcourt, Jennifer L., Lester, Sandra, Atherton, Lydia, Honein, Margaret A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7
_version_ 1784841952331563008
author Tinker, Sarah C.
Prince-Guerra, Jessica L.
Vermandere, Kelly
Gettings, Jenna
Drenzik, Cherie
Voccio, Gary
Parrott, Tonia
Drobeniuc, Jan
Hayden, Tonya
Briggs, Stephen
Heida, Debbie
Thornburg, Natalie
Barrios, Lisa C.
Neatherlin, John C.
Madni, Sabrina
Rasberry, Catherine N.
Swanson, Kenneth D.
Tamin, Azaibi
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Lester, Sandra
Atherton, Lydia
Honein, Margaret A.
author_facet Tinker, Sarah C.
Prince-Guerra, Jessica L.
Vermandere, Kelly
Gettings, Jenna
Drenzik, Cherie
Voccio, Gary
Parrott, Tonia
Drobeniuc, Jan
Hayden, Tonya
Briggs, Stephen
Heida, Debbie
Thornburg, Natalie
Barrios, Lisa C.
Neatherlin, John C.
Madni, Sabrina
Rasberry, Catherine N.
Swanson, Kenneth D.
Tamin, Azaibi
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Lester, Sandra
Atherton, Lydia
Honein, Margaret A.
author_sort Tinker, Sarah C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of our investigation was to better understand barriers to implementation of self-administered antigen screening testing for SARS-CoV-2 at institutions of higher education (IHE). METHODS: Using the Quidel QuickVue At-Home COVID-19 Test, 1347 IHE students and staff were asked to test twice weekly for seven weeks. We assessed seroconversion using baseline and endline serum specimens. Online surveys assessed acceptability. RESULTS: Participants reported 9971 self-administered antigen test results. Among participants who were not antibody positive at baseline, the median number of tests reported was eight. Among 324 participants seronegative at baseline, with endline antibody results and ≥ 1 self-administered antigen test results, there were five COVID-19 infections; only one was detected by self-administered antigen test (sensitivity = 20%). Acceptability of self-administered antigen tests was high. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly serial self-administered antigen testing in a low prevalence period had low utility in this investigation. Issues of testing fatigue will be important to address in future testing strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97131512022-12-01 Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting Tinker, Sarah C. Prince-Guerra, Jessica L. Vermandere, Kelly Gettings, Jenna Drenzik, Cherie Voccio, Gary Parrott, Tonia Drobeniuc, Jan Hayden, Tonya Briggs, Stephen Heida, Debbie Thornburg, Natalie Barrios, Lisa C. Neatherlin, John C. Madni, Sabrina Rasberry, Catherine N. Swanson, Kenneth D. Tamin, Azaibi Harcourt, Jennifer L. Lester, Sandra Atherton, Lydia Honein, Margaret A. Virol J Research BACKGROUND: The objective of our investigation was to better understand barriers to implementation of self-administered antigen screening testing for SARS-CoV-2 at institutions of higher education (IHE). METHODS: Using the Quidel QuickVue At-Home COVID-19 Test, 1347 IHE students and staff were asked to test twice weekly for seven weeks. We assessed seroconversion using baseline and endline serum specimens. Online surveys assessed acceptability. RESULTS: Participants reported 9971 self-administered antigen test results. Among participants who were not antibody positive at baseline, the median number of tests reported was eight. Among 324 participants seronegative at baseline, with endline antibody results and ≥ 1 self-administered antigen test results, there were five COVID-19 infections; only one was detected by self-administered antigen test (sensitivity = 20%). Acceptability of self-administered antigen tests was high. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly serial self-administered antigen testing in a low prevalence period had low utility in this investigation. Issues of testing fatigue will be important to address in future testing strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9713151/ /pubmed/36457114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tinker, Sarah C.
Prince-Guerra, Jessica L.
Vermandere, Kelly
Gettings, Jenna
Drenzik, Cherie
Voccio, Gary
Parrott, Tonia
Drobeniuc, Jan
Hayden, Tonya
Briggs, Stephen
Heida, Debbie
Thornburg, Natalie
Barrios, Lisa C.
Neatherlin, John C.
Madni, Sabrina
Rasberry, Catherine N.
Swanson, Kenneth D.
Tamin, Azaibi
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Lester, Sandra
Atherton, Lydia
Honein, Margaret A.
Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title_full Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title_short Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
title_sort evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01927-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tinkersarahc evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT princeguerrajessical evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT vermanderekelly evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT gettingsjenna evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT drenzikcherie evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT vocciogary evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT parrotttonia evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT drobeniucjan evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT haydentonya evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT briggsstephen evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT heidadebbie evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT thornburgnatalie evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT barrioslisac evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT neatherlinjohnc evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT madnisabrina evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT rasberrycatherinen evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT swansonkennethd evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT taminazaibi evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT harcourtjenniferl evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT lestersandra evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT athertonlydia evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting
AT honeinmargareta evaluationofselfadministeredantigentestinginacollegesetting