Cargando…

Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry

BACKGROUND: Megaprosthetic replacement (MPR) of the femur is typically reserved for salvage or oncological reconstruction. Presently little is known about the provision of femoral MPRs performed nationally, the trends in indications for their use, and their outcomes beyond published unit-level data....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puttock, Darren R., Howard, Daniel P., Eastley, Nicholas C., Ashford, Robert U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7
_version_ 1784841952854802432
author Puttock, Darren R.
Howard, Daniel P.
Eastley, Nicholas C.
Ashford, Robert U.
author_facet Puttock, Darren R.
Howard, Daniel P.
Eastley, Nicholas C.
Ashford, Robert U.
author_sort Puttock, Darren R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Megaprosthetic replacement (MPR) of the femur is typically reserved for salvage or oncological reconstruction. Presently little is known about the provision of femoral MPRs performed nationally, the trends in indications for their use, and their outcomes beyond published unit-level data. Although the National Joint Registry (NJR) collects data as part of a mandatory arthroplasty audit process, MPR data entry on this platform is thought to be inconsistent. The aim of this study is to determine current trends for femoral MPR procedures as submitted to the NJR. METHODS: Data for all procedures submitted to the NJR using the following implants were extracted: METS (Stanmore/Stryker), MUTARS (Implantcast), Segmental (Zimmer), GMRS (Stryker) and MEGA C (LINK). Pseudoanonymized data were analyzed through the NJR’s research Data Access Portal and are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1781 procedures were identified. Submitted cases increased for primary and revision hip and knee categories over the study period, although they plateaued in recent years. MPR implants were most commonly used in revision hip arthroplasty procedures. MPR use for the management of peri-prosthetic fractures has increased and now represents the most commonly reported indication for MPR use in both hip and knee revision categories. Few centers submitted large MPR case volumes (which were noted to be lower than published unit case series, indicating NJR under-reporting), and the vast majority of centers submitting MPR cases did so in low volume. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the limitations identified, reported case volumes must be interpreted with caution. An MPR-specific NJR data entry form has been developed to allow more accurate and tailored reporting of MPR procedures, to support specialist service provision, and to provide meaningful data for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97131542022-12-01 Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry Puttock, Darren R. Howard, Daniel P. Eastley, Nicholas C. Ashford, Robert U. Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: Megaprosthetic replacement (MPR) of the femur is typically reserved for salvage or oncological reconstruction. Presently little is known about the provision of femoral MPRs performed nationally, the trends in indications for their use, and their outcomes beyond published unit-level data. Although the National Joint Registry (NJR) collects data as part of a mandatory arthroplasty audit process, MPR data entry on this platform is thought to be inconsistent. The aim of this study is to determine current trends for femoral MPR procedures as submitted to the NJR. METHODS: Data for all procedures submitted to the NJR using the following implants were extracted: METS (Stanmore/Stryker), MUTARS (Implantcast), Segmental (Zimmer), GMRS (Stryker) and MEGA C (LINK). Pseudoanonymized data were analyzed through the NJR’s research Data Access Portal and are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1781 procedures were identified. Submitted cases increased for primary and revision hip and knee categories over the study period, although they plateaued in recent years. MPR implants were most commonly used in revision hip arthroplasty procedures. MPR use for the management of peri-prosthetic fractures has increased and now represents the most commonly reported indication for MPR use in both hip and knee revision categories. Few centers submitted large MPR case volumes (which were noted to be lower than published unit case series, indicating NJR under-reporting), and the vast majority of centers submitting MPR cases did so in low volume. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the limitations identified, reported case volumes must be interpreted with caution. An MPR-specific NJR data entry form has been developed to allow more accurate and tailored reporting of MPR procedures, to support specialist service provision, and to provide meaningful data for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9713154/ /pubmed/36451228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Puttock, Darren R.
Howard, Daniel P.
Eastley, Nicholas C.
Ashford, Robert U.
Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title_full Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title_fullStr Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title_full_unstemmed Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title_short Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
title_sort apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the national joint registry
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7
work_keys_str_mv AT puttockdarrenr apparenttrendsintheuseoffemoralmegaprosthesesananalysisfromthenationaljointregistry
AT howarddanielp apparenttrendsintheuseoffemoralmegaprosthesesananalysisfromthenationaljointregistry
AT eastleynicholasc apparenttrendsintheuseoffemoralmegaprosthesesananalysisfromthenationaljointregistry
AT ashfordrobertu apparenttrendsintheuseoffemoralmegaprosthesesananalysisfromthenationaljointregistry