Cargando…

Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study

BACKGROUNDS: To date, it is unclear what the educational response to the restrictions on minimally invasive surgery imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have been, and how MIS-surgeons see the post-pandemic future of surgical education. Using a modified Delphi-methodology, this study aims to assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feenstra, Tim M., Tejedor, Patricia, Popa, Dorin E., Francis, Nader, Schijven, Marlies P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09762-1
_version_ 1784841957997019136
author Feenstra, Tim M.
Tejedor, Patricia
Popa, Dorin E.
Francis, Nader
Schijven, Marlies P.
author_facet Feenstra, Tim M.
Tejedor, Patricia
Popa, Dorin E.
Francis, Nader
Schijven, Marlies P.
author_sort Feenstra, Tim M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: To date, it is unclear what the educational response to the restrictions on minimally invasive surgery imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have been, and how MIS-surgeons see the post-pandemic future of surgical education. Using a modified Delphi-methodology, this study aims to assess the effects of COVID on MIS-training and to develop a consensus on the educational response to the pandemic. METHODS: A three-part Delphi study was performed among the membership of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). The first survey aimed to survey participants on the educational response in four educational components: training in the operating room (OR), wet lab and dry lab training, assessment and accreditation, and use of digital resources. The second and third survey aimed to formulate and achieve consensus on statements on, and resources in, response to the pandemic and in post-pandemic MIS surgery. RESULTS: Over 247 EAES members participated in the three rounds of this Delphi survey. MIS-training decreased by 35.6–55.6%, alternatives were introduced in 14.7–32.2% of respondents, and these alternatives compensated for 32.2–43.2% of missed training. OR-training and assessments were most often affected due to the cancellation of elective cases (80.7%, and 73.8% affected, respectively). Consensus was achieved on 13 statements. Although digital resources were deemed valuable alternatives for OR-training and skills assessments, face-to-face resources were preferred. Videos and hands-on training–wet labs, dry labs, and virtual reality (VR) simulation–were the best appreciated resources. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has severely affected surgical training opportunities for minimally invasive surgery. Face-to-face training remains the preferred training method, although digital and remote training resources are believed to be valuable additions to the training palette. Organizations such as the EAES are encouraged to support surgical educators in implementing these resources. Insights from this Delphi can guide (inter)national governing training bodies and hospitals in shaping surgical resident curricula in post pandemic times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97131742022-12-01 Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study Feenstra, Tim M. Tejedor, Patricia Popa, Dorin E. Francis, Nader Schijven, Marlies P. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUNDS: To date, it is unclear what the educational response to the restrictions on minimally invasive surgery imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have been, and how MIS-surgeons see the post-pandemic future of surgical education. Using a modified Delphi-methodology, this study aims to assess the effects of COVID on MIS-training and to develop a consensus on the educational response to the pandemic. METHODS: A three-part Delphi study was performed among the membership of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). The first survey aimed to survey participants on the educational response in four educational components: training in the operating room (OR), wet lab and dry lab training, assessment and accreditation, and use of digital resources. The second and third survey aimed to formulate and achieve consensus on statements on, and resources in, response to the pandemic and in post-pandemic MIS surgery. RESULTS: Over 247 EAES members participated in the three rounds of this Delphi survey. MIS-training decreased by 35.6–55.6%, alternatives were introduced in 14.7–32.2% of respondents, and these alternatives compensated for 32.2–43.2% of missed training. OR-training and assessments were most often affected due to the cancellation of elective cases (80.7%, and 73.8% affected, respectively). Consensus was achieved on 13 statements. Although digital resources were deemed valuable alternatives for OR-training and skills assessments, face-to-face resources were preferred. Videos and hands-on training–wet labs, dry labs, and virtual reality (VR) simulation–were the best appreciated resources. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has severely affected surgical training opportunities for minimally invasive surgery. Face-to-face training remains the preferred training method, although digital and remote training resources are believed to be valuable additions to the training palette. Organizations such as the EAES are encouraged to support surgical educators in implementing these resources. Insights from this Delphi can guide (inter)national governing training bodies and hospitals in shaping surgical resident curricula in post pandemic times. Springer US 2022-11-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9713174/ /pubmed/36451042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09762-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Feenstra, Tim M.
Tejedor, Patricia
Popa, Dorin E.
Francis, Nader
Schijven, Marlies P.
Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title_full Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title_fullStr Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title_full_unstemmed Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title_short Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study
title_sort surgical education in the post-covid era: an eaes delphi-study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09762-1
work_keys_str_mv AT feenstratimm surgicaleducationinthepostcovideraaneaesdelphistudy
AT tejedorpatricia surgicaleducationinthepostcovideraaneaesdelphistudy
AT popadorine surgicaleducationinthepostcovideraaneaesdelphistudy
AT francisnader surgicaleducationinthepostcovideraaneaesdelphistudy
AT schijvenmarliesp surgicaleducationinthepostcovideraaneaesdelphistudy