Cargando…
Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement
BACKGROUND: Advances in smart technology have expanded into the field of orthopedic surgery to deliver enhanced patient care. Smart technology has also raised important issues regarding protected patient information. The purpose of this study is to determine patient preferences regarding smart techn...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.10.006 |
_version_ | 1784841981797597184 |
---|---|
author | DeFrance, Michael Lang, Jonathan Aprigliano, Caroline Danoff, Jonathan R. Nett, Michael |
author_facet | DeFrance, Michael Lang, Jonathan Aprigliano, Caroline Danoff, Jonathan R. Nett, Michael |
author_sort | DeFrance, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in smart technology have expanded into the field of orthopedic surgery to deliver enhanced patient care. Smart technology has also raised important issues regarding protected patient information. The purpose of this study is to determine patient preferences regarding smart technology in their postarthroplasty care. METHODS: Patient surveys were administered in the office setting of 2 adult reconstructive orthopedic surgeons during a 4-week period. Surveys queried patient demographics, twelve yes/no questions, five continuous agree/disagree statements, and a single free-text question. Logistic regression and statistical significance testing were performed. RESULTS: Of the study patients, 83.6% were willing to wear a device. Women were more likely to consent to a monitoring device and have activity data collected than men (P < .05). Younger patients were more likely to consent to a device and have data collected than octogenarians. Nearly 90% of respondents indicated peace of mind with data being constantly tracked. However, 64% of respondents had hesitations about a surgically implanted device that was independent of a previous arthroplasty surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are comfortable with smart technology being involved in their postoperative care, especially younger patients and women. Older individuals, possibly with less experience using smart technology in their lives, were not as willing to wear smart devices or have their data collected. Nearly two-thirds of patients had hesitations about surgically implanted smart devices. Further investigation is needed to understand hesitations concerning smart implants as the orthopedic community enters an era of commercially available smart implants in total joint arthroplasty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9713269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97132692022-12-02 Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement DeFrance, Michael Lang, Jonathan Aprigliano, Caroline Danoff, Jonathan R. Nett, Michael Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Advances in smart technology have expanded into the field of orthopedic surgery to deliver enhanced patient care. Smart technology has also raised important issues regarding protected patient information. The purpose of this study is to determine patient preferences regarding smart technology in their postarthroplasty care. METHODS: Patient surveys were administered in the office setting of 2 adult reconstructive orthopedic surgeons during a 4-week period. Surveys queried patient demographics, twelve yes/no questions, five continuous agree/disagree statements, and a single free-text question. Logistic regression and statistical significance testing were performed. RESULTS: Of the study patients, 83.6% were willing to wear a device. Women were more likely to consent to a monitoring device and have activity data collected than men (P < .05). Younger patients were more likely to consent to a device and have data collected than octogenarians. Nearly 90% of respondents indicated peace of mind with data being constantly tracked. However, 64% of respondents had hesitations about a surgically implanted device that was independent of a previous arthroplasty surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are comfortable with smart technology being involved in their postoperative care, especially younger patients and women. Older individuals, possibly with less experience using smart technology in their lives, were not as willing to wear smart devices or have their data collected. Nearly two-thirds of patients had hesitations about surgically implanted smart devices. Further investigation is needed to understand hesitations concerning smart implants as the orthopedic community enters an era of commercially available smart implants in total joint arthroplasty. Elsevier 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9713269/ /pubmed/36465696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.10.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research DeFrance, Michael Lang, Jonathan Aprigliano, Caroline Danoff, Jonathan R. Nett, Michael Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title | Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title_full | Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title_fullStr | Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title_short | Understanding Patient Perspectives Regarding Remote Monitoring Devices Following Total Joint Replacement |
title_sort | understanding patient perspectives regarding remote monitoring devices following total joint replacement |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.10.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT defrancemichael understandingpatientperspectivesregardingremotemonitoringdevicesfollowingtotaljointreplacement AT langjonathan understandingpatientperspectivesregardingremotemonitoringdevicesfollowingtotaljointreplacement AT apriglianocaroline understandingpatientperspectivesregardingremotemonitoringdevicesfollowingtotaljointreplacement AT danoffjonathanr understandingpatientperspectivesregardingremotemonitoringdevicesfollowingtotaljointreplacement AT nettmichael understandingpatientperspectivesregardingremotemonitoringdevicesfollowingtotaljointreplacement |