Cargando…

Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences

OBJECTIVE: An exponential implementation of remote mental health care has been observed, but little data is available on experiences and barriers of remote health from a patient’s perspective. This study investigated experiences associated with several forms of remote consultations (both telephone a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crunelle, Cleo L., Van Daele, Tom, Van Laere, Sven, Blancke, Stefaan, Vanderbruggen, Nathalie, Matthys, Frieda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01175-4
_version_ 1784842074836697088
author Crunelle, Cleo L.
Van Daele, Tom
Van Laere, Sven
Blancke, Stefaan
Vanderbruggen, Nathalie
Matthys, Frieda
author_facet Crunelle, Cleo L.
Van Daele, Tom
Van Laere, Sven
Blancke, Stefaan
Vanderbruggen, Nathalie
Matthys, Frieda
author_sort Crunelle, Cleo L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: An exponential implementation of remote mental health care has been observed, but little data is available on experiences and barriers of remote health from a patient’s perspective. This study investigated experiences associated with several forms of remote consultations (both telephone and online video) for mental health care during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic with a particular focus on patients’ experiences. METHODS: This study includes results of an online web-based survey filled in by 512 patients on the use and experiences of remote mental health consultations and circulating between March and October 2021. RESULTS: Psychiatric consultations were initiated by the health care provider in 47.0% of cases, while psychological consultations were most often initiated in shared decision with the patient (54.9%). Only 28.8% of participants mentioned advantages regarding teleconsultations over face-to-face, compared to 39.3% for online video consultations. Moreover, 49.3% saw clear disadvantages for teleconsultations and 32.7% for video consultations. Positive factors associated with remote mental health care included when faced with transportation problems, followed by consultations primarily focusing on medication (for telephone consultations) or on more practical aspects (for video consultations). 25.0% of patients deemed conversations when being angry or sad to be feasible by telephone, and 33.0% considered these feasibly using video consultations. CONCLUSION: Remote consultations were deemed feasible, but the positive factors did not seem to outweigh the face-to-face contacts from a patient’s perspective. Remote consultations will probably remain present in the following decades, although care must be taken when providing the possibility of remote mental health care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10900-022-01175-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97137362022-12-01 Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences Crunelle, Cleo L. Van Daele, Tom Van Laere, Sven Blancke, Stefaan Vanderbruggen, Nathalie Matthys, Frieda J Community Health Original Paper OBJECTIVE: An exponential implementation of remote mental health care has been observed, but little data is available on experiences and barriers of remote health from a patient’s perspective. This study investigated experiences associated with several forms of remote consultations (both telephone and online video) for mental health care during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic with a particular focus on patients’ experiences. METHODS: This study includes results of an online web-based survey filled in by 512 patients on the use and experiences of remote mental health consultations and circulating between March and October 2021. RESULTS: Psychiatric consultations were initiated by the health care provider in 47.0% of cases, while psychological consultations were most often initiated in shared decision with the patient (54.9%). Only 28.8% of participants mentioned advantages regarding teleconsultations over face-to-face, compared to 39.3% for online video consultations. Moreover, 49.3% saw clear disadvantages for teleconsultations and 32.7% for video consultations. Positive factors associated with remote mental health care included when faced with transportation problems, followed by consultations primarily focusing on medication (for telephone consultations) or on more practical aspects (for video consultations). 25.0% of patients deemed conversations when being angry or sad to be feasible by telephone, and 33.0% considered these feasibly using video consultations. CONCLUSION: Remote consultations were deemed feasible, but the positive factors did not seem to outweigh the face-to-face contacts from a patient’s perspective. Remote consultations will probably remain present in the following decades, although care must be taken when providing the possibility of remote mental health care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10900-022-01175-4. Springer US 2022-12-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9713736/ /pubmed/36454479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01175-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Crunelle, Cleo L.
Van Daele, Tom
Van Laere, Sven
Blancke, Stefaan
Vanderbruggen, Nathalie
Matthys, Frieda
Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title_full Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title_fullStr Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title_short Remote Consultations for Mental Health: Patient Experiences
title_sort remote consultations for mental health: patient experiences
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01175-4
work_keys_str_mv AT crunellecleol remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences
AT vandaeletom remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences
AT vanlaeresven remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences
AT blanckestefaan remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences
AT vanderbruggennathalie remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences
AT matthysfrieda remoteconsultationsformentalhealthpatientexperiences