Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema

BACKGROUND: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in the treatment of patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) from a societal perspective in the healthcare sector Zaragoza III in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model with five sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montes Rodríguez, Paula, Mateo Gabás, Javier, Esteban Floría, Olivia, Honrubia Grijalbo, Ana, Ascaso Puyuelo, Francisco J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00401-z
_version_ 1784842127322120192
author Montes Rodríguez, Paula
Mateo Gabás, Javier
Esteban Floría, Olivia
Honrubia Grijalbo, Ana
Ascaso Puyuelo, Francisco J.
author_facet Montes Rodríguez, Paula
Mateo Gabás, Javier
Esteban Floría, Olivia
Honrubia Grijalbo, Ana
Ascaso Puyuelo, Francisco J.
author_sort Montes Rodríguez, Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in the treatment of patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) from a societal perspective in the healthcare sector Zaragoza III in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model with five states defined by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye (Snellen scale) and an additional death state were constructed. Two cohorts of patients were distributed along the VA states and treated during a year with either dexamethasone or aflibercept. One-year follow-up on each group was performed. Medical costs related to the DME treatment and follow-up, medical costs related to the DME comorbidities, and non-medical-related costs were taken into account. Costs (2020 €), health outcomes (Quality-Adjusted Life Years-QALYs), both discounted at a 3.5% annual rate, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER: €/QALY) were determined for a lifetime horizon in the base case analysis. RESULTS: Patients treated with dexamethasone were €77,349 more costly and provided 2.667 additional QALYs (€29,002/QALY) than those treated with aflibercept. The variable efficiency per patient was calculated dividing the improvement in quality of life (on the VFQ-25 scale) by the cost of the treatment. With the obtained results it can be concluded that the efficiency of treating the patients with dexamethasone is significantly superior than the efficiency of treating them with aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: The cost per QALY gained with the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with the one obtained by aflibercept in the naïve DME population is just below the €30,000 threshold, below which, new drugs are sometimes regarded as cost-effective strategies in Spain. In this model, the key variables with greater impact on the cost-effectiveness results were the selected time horizon, the chosen extrapolation method and the number of aflibercept and dexamethasone injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9713987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97139872022-12-02 Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema Montes Rodríguez, Paula Mateo Gabás, Javier Esteban Floría, Olivia Honrubia Grijalbo, Ana Ascaso Puyuelo, Francisco J. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in the treatment of patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) from a societal perspective in the healthcare sector Zaragoza III in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model with five states defined by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye (Snellen scale) and an additional death state were constructed. Two cohorts of patients were distributed along the VA states and treated during a year with either dexamethasone or aflibercept. One-year follow-up on each group was performed. Medical costs related to the DME treatment and follow-up, medical costs related to the DME comorbidities, and non-medical-related costs were taken into account. Costs (2020 €), health outcomes (Quality-Adjusted Life Years-QALYs), both discounted at a 3.5% annual rate, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER: €/QALY) were determined for a lifetime horizon in the base case analysis. RESULTS: Patients treated with dexamethasone were €77,349 more costly and provided 2.667 additional QALYs (€29,002/QALY) than those treated with aflibercept. The variable efficiency per patient was calculated dividing the improvement in quality of life (on the VFQ-25 scale) by the cost of the treatment. With the obtained results it can be concluded that the efficiency of treating the patients with dexamethasone is significantly superior than the efficiency of treating them with aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: The cost per QALY gained with the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with the one obtained by aflibercept in the naïve DME population is just below the €30,000 threshold, below which, new drugs are sometimes regarded as cost-effective strategies in Spain. In this model, the key variables with greater impact on the cost-effectiveness results were the selected time horizon, the chosen extrapolation method and the number of aflibercept and dexamethasone injections. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9713987/ /pubmed/36457024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00401-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Montes Rodríguez, Paula
Mateo Gabás, Javier
Esteban Floría, Olivia
Honrubia Grijalbo, Ana
Ascaso Puyuelo, Francisco J.
Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title_full Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title_short Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
title_sort cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00401-z
work_keys_str_mv AT montesrodriguezpaula costeffectivenessofdexamethasonecomparedwithafliberceptinnaivediabeticmacularedema
AT mateogabasjavier costeffectivenessofdexamethasonecomparedwithafliberceptinnaivediabeticmacularedema
AT estebanfloriaolivia costeffectivenessofdexamethasonecomparedwithafliberceptinnaivediabeticmacularedema
AT honrubiagrijalboana costeffectivenessofdexamethasonecomparedwithafliberceptinnaivediabeticmacularedema
AT ascasopuyuelofranciscoj costeffectivenessofdexamethasonecomparedwithafliberceptinnaivediabeticmacularedema