Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures

BACKGROUND: Gustilo type III tibial fractures commonly involve extensive soft tissue and bony defects, requiring complex reconstructive operations. Although several methods have been proposed, no research has elucidated the efficacies and differences between vascular bone graft (VBG) and the Masquel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lan, Ching-Yu, Lien, Po-Hao, Lin, Yu-Te, Lin, Cheng-Hung, Hsu, Chung-Cheng, Lin, Chih-Hung, Chen, Shih-Heng, Yu, Yi-Hsun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06010-4
_version_ 1784842148535861248
author Lan, Ching-Yu
Lien, Po-Hao
Lin, Yu-Te
Lin, Cheng-Hung
Hsu, Chung-Cheng
Lin, Chih-Hung
Chen, Shih-Heng
Yu, Yi-Hsun
author_facet Lan, Ching-Yu
Lien, Po-Hao
Lin, Yu-Te
Lin, Cheng-Hung
Hsu, Chung-Cheng
Lin, Chih-Hung
Chen, Shih-Heng
Yu, Yi-Hsun
author_sort Lan, Ching-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gustilo type III tibial fractures commonly involve extensive soft tissue and bony defects, requiring complex reconstructive operations. Although several methods have been proposed, no research has elucidated the efficacies and differences between vascular bone graft (VBG) and the Masquelet technique (MT) to date. We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of VBG and the MT for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III tibial fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent reconstruction for Gustilo type III tibial fractures using VBG or the MT in a single center from January 2000 to December 2020. The patients’ demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical interventions were documented for analysis. The clinical outcomes including union status, time to union, postoperative infections, and the causes of union failure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 44 patients: 27 patients underwent VBG, and 17 underwent MT. The average union time was 20.5 ± 15.4 and 15.1 ± 9.0 months in the VBG and MT groups, respectively (p = 0.232). The postoperative deep infection rates were 70.4% and 47.1% in the VBG and MT groups (p = 0.122), respectively. Though not statistically significant, the VBG group had a shorter union time than did the MT group when the bone defect length was > 60 mm (21.0 ± 17.0 versus 23.8 ± 9.4 months, p = 0.729), while the MT group had a shorter union time than did the VBG group when the bone defect was length < 60 mm (17.2 ± 5.6 versus 10.7 ± 4.7 months, p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: VBG and MT are both promising reconstruction methods for Gustilo type III tibial fractures. VBG appears to have more potential in reconstructing larger bone defects, while MT may play an important role in smaller bone defects, severe surgical site infections, and osteomyelitis. Therefore, flexible treatment strategies are required for good outcomes in Gustilo type III open tibial fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97140882022-12-02 Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures Lan, Ching-Yu Lien, Po-Hao Lin, Yu-Te Lin, Cheng-Hung Hsu, Chung-Cheng Lin, Chih-Hung Chen, Shih-Heng Yu, Yi-Hsun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Gustilo type III tibial fractures commonly involve extensive soft tissue and bony defects, requiring complex reconstructive operations. Although several methods have been proposed, no research has elucidated the efficacies and differences between vascular bone graft (VBG) and the Masquelet technique (MT) to date. We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of VBG and the MT for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III tibial fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent reconstruction for Gustilo type III tibial fractures using VBG or the MT in a single center from January 2000 to December 2020. The patients’ demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical interventions were documented for analysis. The clinical outcomes including union status, time to union, postoperative infections, and the causes of union failure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 44 patients: 27 patients underwent VBG, and 17 underwent MT. The average union time was 20.5 ± 15.4 and 15.1 ± 9.0 months in the VBG and MT groups, respectively (p = 0.232). The postoperative deep infection rates were 70.4% and 47.1% in the VBG and MT groups (p = 0.122), respectively. Though not statistically significant, the VBG group had a shorter union time than did the MT group when the bone defect length was > 60 mm (21.0 ± 17.0 versus 23.8 ± 9.4 months, p = 0.729), while the MT group had a shorter union time than did the VBG group when the bone defect was length < 60 mm (17.2 ± 5.6 versus 10.7 ± 4.7 months, p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: VBG and MT are both promising reconstruction methods for Gustilo type III tibial fractures. VBG appears to have more potential in reconstructing larger bone defects, while MT may play an important role in smaller bone defects, severe surgical site infections, and osteomyelitis. Therefore, flexible treatment strategies are required for good outcomes in Gustilo type III open tibial fractures. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714088/ /pubmed/36451238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06010-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lan, Ching-Yu
Lien, Po-Hao
Lin, Yu-Te
Lin, Cheng-Hung
Hsu, Chung-Cheng
Lin, Chih-Hung
Chen, Shih-Heng
Yu, Yi-Hsun
Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title_full Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title_short Comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial fractures
title_sort comparison of the clinical outcomes between vascularized bone graft and the masquelet technique for the reconstruction of gustilo type iii open tibial fractures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06010-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lanchingyu comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT lienpohao comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT linyute comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT linchenghung comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT hsuchungcheng comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT linchihhung comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT chenshihheng comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures
AT yuyihsun comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesbetweenvascularizedbonegraftandthemasquelettechniqueforthereconstructionofgustilotypeiiiopentibialfractures