Cargando…
Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3 |
_version_ | 1784842149861261312 |
---|---|
author | Kramer, Manuel Olach, Martin Zdravkovic, Vilijam Manser, Melanie Jost, Bernhard Spross, Christian |
author_facet | Kramer, Manuel Olach, Martin Zdravkovic, Vilijam Manser, Melanie Jost, Bernhard Spross, Christian |
author_sort | Kramer, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery. RESULTS: The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22–1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22–1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71–118) in group nC and 97.9% (36–125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49–89) in group nC and 68.0 (30–94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up. Level of Evidence III. A retrospective case–control study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9714093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97140932022-12-02 Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study Kramer, Manuel Olach, Martin Zdravkovic, Vilijam Manser, Melanie Jost, Bernhard Spross, Christian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery. RESULTS: The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22–1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22–1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71–118) in group nC and 97.9% (36–125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49–89) in group nC and 68.0 (30–94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up. Level of Evidence III. A retrospective case–control study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714093/ /pubmed/36457072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kramer, Manuel Olach, Martin Zdravkovic, Vilijam Manser, Melanie Jost, Bernhard Spross, Christian Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title | Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title_full | Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title_fullStr | Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title_short | Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
title_sort | cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kramermanuel cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT olachmartin cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT zdravkovicvilijam cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT mansermelanie cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT jostbernhard cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT sprosschristian cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy |