Cargando…

Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study

BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramer, Manuel, Olach, Martin, Zdravkovic, Vilijam, Manser, Melanie, Jost, Bernhard, Spross, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3
_version_ 1784842149861261312
author Kramer, Manuel
Olach, Martin
Zdravkovic, Vilijam
Manser, Melanie
Jost, Bernhard
Spross, Christian
author_facet Kramer, Manuel
Olach, Martin
Zdravkovic, Vilijam
Manser, Melanie
Jost, Bernhard
Spross, Christian
author_sort Kramer, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery. RESULTS: The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22–1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22–1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71–118) in group nC and 97.9% (36–125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49–89) in group nC and 68.0 (30–94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up. Level of Evidence III. A retrospective case–control study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97140932022-12-02 Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study Kramer, Manuel Olach, Martin Zdravkovic, Vilijam Manser, Melanie Jost, Bernhard Spross, Christian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery. RESULTS: The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22–1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22–1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71–118) in group nC and 97.9% (36–125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49–89) in group nC and 68.0 (30–94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up. Level of Evidence III. A retrospective case–control study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714093/ /pubmed/36457072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kramer, Manuel
Olach, Martin
Zdravkovic, Vilijam
Manser, Melanie
Jost, Bernhard
Spross, Christian
Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title_full Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title_fullStr Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title_short Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
title_sort cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly—a retrospective case–control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kramermanuel cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT olachmartin cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zdravkovicvilijam cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT mansermelanie cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT jostbernhard cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT sprosschristian cementedvsuncementedreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyfortheprimarytreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy