Cargando…
Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines
BACKGROUND: Many of the acute infections that are seen in primary care and sometimes managed with antibiotics are self-resolving and antibiotics may be unnecessary. Information about the natural history of these infections underpins antibiotic stewardship strategies such as delayed prescribing and s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07887-1 |
_version_ | 1784842154748674048 |
---|---|
author | Boaitey, Kwame Peprah Bakhit, Mina Krzyzaniak, Natalia Hoffmann, Tammy C. |
author_facet | Boaitey, Kwame Peprah Bakhit, Mina Krzyzaniak, Natalia Hoffmann, Tammy C. |
author_sort | Boaitey, Kwame Peprah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many of the acute infections that are seen in primary care and sometimes managed with antibiotics are self-resolving and antibiotics may be unnecessary. Information about the natural history of these infections underpins antibiotic stewardship strategies such as delayed prescribing and shared decision making, yet whether it’s reported in guidelines is unknown. We examined, in clinical guidelines, the reporting of natural history information and relevant antibiotic stewardship strategies for acute infections commonly seen in primary care. METHODS: A systematic review of national and international guidelines (2010 onwards), available electronically, for managing acute infections (respiratory, urinary, or skin and soft tissue). We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, TRIP, and GIN databases and websites of 22 guideline-publishing organisations. RESULTS: We identified 82 guidelines, covering 114 eligible infections. Natural history information was reported in 49 (59.8%) of the guidelines and 66 (57.9%) of the reported conditions, most commonly for respiratory tract infections. Quantitative information about the expected infection duration was provided for 63.5% (n = 42) of the infections. Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategy was recommended for 34.2% (n = 39) of them and shared decision making for 21% (n = 24). CONCLUSIONS: Just over half of the guidelines for acute infections that are commonly managed in primary care and sometimes with antibiotics contained natural history information. As many of these infections spontaneously improve, this is a missed opportunity to disseminate this information to clinicians, promote antibiotic stewardship, and facilitate conversations with patients and informed decision making. Systematic review registration CRD42021247048 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07887-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9714117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97141172022-12-02 Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines Boaitey, Kwame Peprah Bakhit, Mina Krzyzaniak, Natalia Hoffmann, Tammy C. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Many of the acute infections that are seen in primary care and sometimes managed with antibiotics are self-resolving and antibiotics may be unnecessary. Information about the natural history of these infections underpins antibiotic stewardship strategies such as delayed prescribing and shared decision making, yet whether it’s reported in guidelines is unknown. We examined, in clinical guidelines, the reporting of natural history information and relevant antibiotic stewardship strategies for acute infections commonly seen in primary care. METHODS: A systematic review of national and international guidelines (2010 onwards), available electronically, for managing acute infections (respiratory, urinary, or skin and soft tissue). We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, TRIP, and GIN databases and websites of 22 guideline-publishing organisations. RESULTS: We identified 82 guidelines, covering 114 eligible infections. Natural history information was reported in 49 (59.8%) of the guidelines and 66 (57.9%) of the reported conditions, most commonly for respiratory tract infections. Quantitative information about the expected infection duration was provided for 63.5% (n = 42) of the infections. Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategy was recommended for 34.2% (n = 39) of them and shared decision making for 21% (n = 24). CONCLUSIONS: Just over half of the guidelines for acute infections that are commonly managed in primary care and sometimes with antibiotics contained natural history information. As many of these infections spontaneously improve, this is a missed opportunity to disseminate this information to clinicians, promote antibiotic stewardship, and facilitate conversations with patients and informed decision making. Systematic review registration CRD42021247048 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07887-1. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714117/ /pubmed/36456959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07887-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Boaitey, Kwame Peprah Bakhit, Mina Krzyzaniak, Natalia Hoffmann, Tammy C. Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title | Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title_full | Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title_fullStr | Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title_short | Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
title_sort | information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07887-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boaiteykwamepeprah informationaboutthenaturalhistoryofacuteinfectionscommonlyseeninprimarycareasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelines AT bakhitmina informationaboutthenaturalhistoryofacuteinfectionscommonlyseeninprimarycareasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelines AT krzyzaniaknatalia informationaboutthenaturalhistoryofacuteinfectionscommonlyseeninprimarycareasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelines AT hoffmanntammyc informationaboutthenaturalhistoryofacuteinfectionscommonlyseeninprimarycareasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelines |