Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with situs inversus totalis (SIT) is rarely understood due to its rarity. Patient position and endoscope manipulation were the main concerns in published case reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Bin, Wang, Jun, Wei, Xing, Du, Yu, Xia, Liang, Sun, Chenyi, Han, Kun, Yang, Xue, Guo, Xuegang, Pan, Yanglin, Wang, Xiangping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02593-3
_version_ 1784842163468632064
author Ding, Bin
Wang, Jun
Wei, Xing
Du, Yu
Xia, Liang
Sun, Chenyi
Han, Kun
Yang, Xue
Guo, Xuegang
Pan, Yanglin
Wang, Xiangping
author_facet Ding, Bin
Wang, Jun
Wei, Xing
Du, Yu
Xia, Liang
Sun, Chenyi
Han, Kun
Yang, Xue
Guo, Xuegang
Pan, Yanglin
Wang, Xiangping
author_sort Ding, Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with situs inversus totalis (SIT) is rarely understood due to its rarity. Patient position and endoscope manipulation were the main concerns in published case reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ERCP in SIT patients. METHODS: Patients with SIT who underwent ERCP were enrolled in nine endoscopic centers in China. ERCP procedural details and complications in SIT patients were retrieved from electronic medical record. The data was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2021, totally 14 patients with SIT undergoing ERCP were identified. The mean age was 56.8 years old and the male–female ratio was 5:2. The main indication for ERCP was common bile duct stones (13/14, 92.9%). All procedure were performed by experienced endoscopists. 21.4% (3/14) of patients were under regular position (prone), while 78.6% under modified position (supine, left or right lateral). Difficult cannulation was occurred in 71.4% (10/14) of patients. The rate of successful cannulation was 85.7% (12/14). Complication occurred in 3 patients (3/14, 21.4%), including 1 bleeding, 1 pneumonia and 1 acute myocardial infarction. No post-pancreatitis or death happened. Compared to patients in modified position, those in prone position had numerically less successful cannulations (66.7% vs. 90.9%) and higher adverse events (33.3% vs. 18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in patient with SIT is challenging even for experienced endoscopists, modified patient positions might have potential benefits concerning more successful cannulations and less complications. More case experiences are need for comprehensive understanding of ERCP in patients with SIT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02593-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97141602022-12-02 Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review Ding, Bin Wang, Jun Wei, Xing Du, Yu Xia, Liang Sun, Chenyi Han, Kun Yang, Xue Guo, Xuegang Pan, Yanglin Wang, Xiangping BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with situs inversus totalis (SIT) is rarely understood due to its rarity. Patient position and endoscope manipulation were the main concerns in published case reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ERCP in SIT patients. METHODS: Patients with SIT who underwent ERCP were enrolled in nine endoscopic centers in China. ERCP procedural details and complications in SIT patients were retrieved from electronic medical record. The data was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2021, totally 14 patients with SIT undergoing ERCP were identified. The mean age was 56.8 years old and the male–female ratio was 5:2. The main indication for ERCP was common bile duct stones (13/14, 92.9%). All procedure were performed by experienced endoscopists. 21.4% (3/14) of patients were under regular position (prone), while 78.6% under modified position (supine, left or right lateral). Difficult cannulation was occurred in 71.4% (10/14) of patients. The rate of successful cannulation was 85.7% (12/14). Complication occurred in 3 patients (3/14, 21.4%), including 1 bleeding, 1 pneumonia and 1 acute myocardial infarction. No post-pancreatitis or death happened. Compared to patients in modified position, those in prone position had numerically less successful cannulations (66.7% vs. 90.9%) and higher adverse events (33.3% vs. 18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in patient with SIT is challenging even for experienced endoscopists, modified patient positions might have potential benefits concerning more successful cannulations and less complications. More case experiences are need for comprehensive understanding of ERCP in patients with SIT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02593-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9714160/ /pubmed/36451092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02593-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ding, Bin
Wang, Jun
Wei, Xing
Du, Yu
Xia, Liang
Sun, Chenyi
Han, Kun
Yang, Xue
Guo, Xuegang
Pan, Yanglin
Wang, Xiangping
Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title_full Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title_short Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
title_sort efficacy and safety of ercp in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02593-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dingbin efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT wangjun efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT weixing efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT duyu efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT xialiang efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT sunchenyi efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT hankun efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT yangxue efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT guoxuegang efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT panyanglin efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT wangxiangping efficacyandsafetyofercpinpatientswithsitusinversustotalismulticentercaseseriesandliteraturereview