Cargando…

Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and early prevention is particularly important for their health, but there is no widely accepted approach to predict it in the early pregnancy. The aim of the present study is to build and evaluate predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Yiling, He, Andong, Tang, Chaoping, Liu, Haixia, Li, Ling, Yang, Xiaofeng, Wang, Xiufang, Shen, Fei, Liu, Jia, Li, Jing, Li, Ruiman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05219-4
_version_ 1784842168977850368
author Wei, Yiling
He, Andong
Tang, Chaoping
Liu, Haixia
Li, Ling
Yang, Xiaofeng
Wang, Xiufang
Shen, Fei
Liu, Jia
Li, Jing
Li, Ruiman
author_facet Wei, Yiling
He, Andong
Tang, Chaoping
Liu, Haixia
Li, Ling
Yang, Xiaofeng
Wang, Xiufang
Shen, Fei
Liu, Jia
Li, Jing
Li, Ruiman
author_sort Wei, Yiling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and early prevention is particularly important for their health, but there is no widely accepted approach to predict it in the early pregnancy. The aim of the present study is to build and evaluate predictive models for GDM using routine indexes, including maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, before 16 gestational weeks. METHODS: A total of 2895 pregnant women were recruited and maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers before 16 weeks of gestation were collected from two hospitals. All participants were randomly stratified into the training cohort and the internal validation cohort by the ratio of 7:3. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, two nomogram models, including a basic model and an extended model, were built. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity were used to evaluate the models in the internal validation cohort. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the basic and the extended model was 0.736 and 0.756 in the training cohort, and was 0.736 and 0.763 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted values of the two models were not significantly different from the actual observations (p = 0.289 and 0.636 in the training cohort, p = 0.684 and 0.635 in the internal validation cohort, respectively). The decision-curve analysis showed a good clinical application value of the models. CONCLUSIONS: The present study built simple and effective models, indicating that routine clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to predict the risk of GDM in the early pregnancy, and providing a novel reference for studying the prediction of GDM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05219-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97141872022-12-02 Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks Wei, Yiling He, Andong Tang, Chaoping Liu, Haixia Li, Ling Yang, Xiaofeng Wang, Xiufang Shen, Fei Liu, Jia Li, Jing Li, Ruiman BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and early prevention is particularly important for their health, but there is no widely accepted approach to predict it in the early pregnancy. The aim of the present study is to build and evaluate predictive models for GDM using routine indexes, including maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, before 16 gestational weeks. METHODS: A total of 2895 pregnant women were recruited and maternal clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers before 16 weeks of gestation were collected from two hospitals. All participants were randomly stratified into the training cohort and the internal validation cohort by the ratio of 7:3. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, two nomogram models, including a basic model and an extended model, were built. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity were used to evaluate the models in the internal validation cohort. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the basic and the extended model was 0.736 and 0.756 in the training cohort, and was 0.736 and 0.763 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted values of the two models were not significantly different from the actual observations (p = 0.289 and 0.636 in the training cohort, p = 0.684 and 0.635 in the internal validation cohort, respectively). The decision-curve analysis showed a good clinical application value of the models. CONCLUSIONS: The present study built simple and effective models, indicating that routine clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to predict the risk of GDM in the early pregnancy, and providing a novel reference for studying the prediction of GDM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05219-4. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714187/ /pubmed/36456970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05219-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wei, Yiling
He, Andong
Tang, Chaoping
Liu, Haixia
Li, Ling
Yang, Xiaofeng
Wang, Xiufang
Shen, Fei
Liu, Jia
Li, Jing
Li, Ruiman
Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title_full Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title_fullStr Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title_full_unstemmed Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title_short Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
title_sort risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05219-4
work_keys_str_mv AT weiyiling riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT heandong riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT tangchaoping riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT liuhaixia riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT liling riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT yangxiaofeng riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT wangxiufang riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT shenfei riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT liujia riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT lijing riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks
AT liruiman riskpredictionmodelsofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbefore16gestationalweeks