Cargando…

A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis

BACKGROUND: Endometrial receptivity array (ERA) is used to determine the timing of embryo transfer (ET) synchronized with the window of implantation (WOI). The effectiveness and evaluation of ERAs in women with recurrent implantation failure remain controversial. We report the case of a patient with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ota, Kuniaki, Takahashi, Toshifumi, Mitsui, Junichiro, Kuroda, Kishio, Hiraoka, Kenichiro, Kawai, Kiyotaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05241-6
_version_ 1784842180268916736
author Ota, Kuniaki
Takahashi, Toshifumi
Mitsui, Junichiro
Kuroda, Kishio
Hiraoka, Kenichiro
Kawai, Kiyotaka
author_facet Ota, Kuniaki
Takahashi, Toshifumi
Mitsui, Junichiro
Kuroda, Kishio
Hiraoka, Kenichiro
Kawai, Kiyotaka
author_sort Ota, Kuniaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometrial receptivity array (ERA) is used to determine the timing of embryo transfer (ET) synchronized with the window of implantation (WOI). The effectiveness and evaluation of ERAs in women with recurrent implantation failure remain controversial. We report the case of a patient with recurrent implantation failure that raises the issue of reproducibility of ERA tests. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old Japanese woman with secondary infertility who had previously given birth failed to conceive after three frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. An ERA test was conducted to confirm the WOI. The first ERA test was performed 125 h after progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium was in a non-receptive (post-receptive) phase, and recommended retesting 101 h after progesterone exposure. A simultaneous chronic endometritis (CE) test showed a score of 3. After the antibiotics administration to treat CE, the second ERA test was performed after 101 h of progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium had not reached the WOI and estimated the WOI to be 113 ± 3 h after progesterone exposure. The third ERA test was performed 113 h after progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium was in a non-receptive (pre-receptive) phase and estimated the WOI to be 137 ± 3 h after progesterone exposure. A CE test performed at the same time as the second and third ERA tests showed a score of 1 for the collected endometrium. According to the third ERA test results, the vitrified-warmed blastocyst was transferred at 137 h of progesterone exposure. Pregnancy was achieved and the patient had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery at 39 weeks. One year later, another pregnancy was achieved after FET at 137 h of progesterone exposure, and the patient delivered at 33 weeks due to an unexpected membrane rupture. CONCLUSION: Because the results of the ERA test may vary in the presence of CE, CE should be diagnosed simultaneously with or before conducting ERA tests. If CE is diagnosed, ERA testing should be performed after treatment with antimicrobials or other drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97142412022-12-02 A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis Ota, Kuniaki Takahashi, Toshifumi Mitsui, Junichiro Kuroda, Kishio Hiraoka, Kenichiro Kawai, Kiyotaka BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Case Report BACKGROUND: Endometrial receptivity array (ERA) is used to determine the timing of embryo transfer (ET) synchronized with the window of implantation (WOI). The effectiveness and evaluation of ERAs in women with recurrent implantation failure remain controversial. We report the case of a patient with recurrent implantation failure that raises the issue of reproducibility of ERA tests. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old Japanese woman with secondary infertility who had previously given birth failed to conceive after three frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. An ERA test was conducted to confirm the WOI. The first ERA test was performed 125 h after progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium was in a non-receptive (post-receptive) phase, and recommended retesting 101 h after progesterone exposure. A simultaneous chronic endometritis (CE) test showed a score of 3. After the antibiotics administration to treat CE, the second ERA test was performed after 101 h of progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium had not reached the WOI and estimated the WOI to be 113 ± 3 h after progesterone exposure. The third ERA test was performed 113 h after progesterone exposure. The laboratory reported that the endometrium was in a non-receptive (pre-receptive) phase and estimated the WOI to be 137 ± 3 h after progesterone exposure. A CE test performed at the same time as the second and third ERA tests showed a score of 1 for the collected endometrium. According to the third ERA test results, the vitrified-warmed blastocyst was transferred at 137 h of progesterone exposure. Pregnancy was achieved and the patient had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery at 39 weeks. One year later, another pregnancy was achieved after FET at 137 h of progesterone exposure, and the patient delivered at 33 weeks due to an unexpected membrane rupture. CONCLUSION: Because the results of the ERA test may vary in the presence of CE, CE should be diagnosed simultaneously with or before conducting ERA tests. If CE is diagnosed, ERA testing should be performed after treatment with antimicrobials or other drugs. BioMed Central 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714241/ /pubmed/36456975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05241-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ota, Kuniaki
Takahashi, Toshifumi
Mitsui, Junichiro
Kuroda, Kishio
Hiraoka, Kenichiro
Kawai, Kiyotaka
A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title_full A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title_fullStr A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title_full_unstemmed A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title_short A case of discrepancy between three ERA tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
title_sort case of discrepancy between three era tests in a woman with repeated implantation failure complicated by chronic endometritis
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05241-6
work_keys_str_mv AT otakuniaki acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT takahashitoshifumi acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT mitsuijunichiro acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT kurodakishio acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT hiraokakenichiro acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT kawaikiyotaka acaseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT otakuniaki caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT takahashitoshifumi caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT mitsuijunichiro caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT kurodakishio caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT hiraokakenichiro caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis
AT kawaikiyotaka caseofdiscrepancybetweenthreeeratestsinawomanwithrepeatedimplantationfailurecomplicatedbychronicendometritis