Cargando…
Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Over the decades, many assessment methods have been developed around the world and used for occupational health risk assessment (OHRA). This scoping review integrated the literature on methodological studies of OHRA in China and aimed to identifies the research hot-spots and methodologic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996 |
_version_ | 1784842192464904192 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Lifang Xue, Panqi Zhang, Yixin Wei, Fang Zhou, Jiena Wang, Shasha Hu, Yong Lou, Xiaoming Zou, Hua |
author_facet | Zhou, Lifang Xue, Panqi Zhang, Yixin Wei, Fang Zhou, Jiena Wang, Shasha Hu, Yong Lou, Xiaoming Zou, Hua |
author_sort | Zhou, Lifang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the decades, many assessment methods have been developed around the world and used for occupational health risk assessment (OHRA). This scoping review integrated the literature on methodological studies of OHRA in China and aimed to identifies the research hot-spots and methodological research perspectives on OHRA in China. METHODS: A scoping review of literature was undertaken to explore the research progress on OHRA methods in China. Focusing on OHRA methods, the authors systematically searched Chinese and English databases and relevant guideline websites from the date of establishment to June 30, 2022. Databases included Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Database. Some other websites were also searched to obtain gray literature. The extracted information included the author, year, region of first author, the target industry, risk assessment model, study type, the main results and conclusions. RESULTS: Finally, 145 of 9,081 studies were included in this review. There were 108 applied studies, 30 comparative studies and 7 optimization studies on OHRA in China. The OHRA methods studied included: (1) qualitative methods such as Romanian model, Australian model, International Council on Mining and Metals model, and Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials; (2) quantitative methods such as the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency inhalation risk assessment model, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic, and Monte Carlo simulation; (3) semi-quantitative methods such as Singapore model, Fuzzy mathematical risk assessment model, Likelihood Exposure Consequence method and Occupational Hazard Risk Index assessment method; (4) comprehensive method (Chinese OHRA standard GBZ/T 298-2017). Each of the OHRA methods had its own strengths and limitations. In order to improve the applicability of OHRA methods, some of them have been optimized by researchers. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of OHRA methods studied in China, including applied, comparative, and optimization studies. Their applicability needs to be further tested through further application in different industries. Furthermore, quantitative comparative studies, optimization studies, and modeling studies are also needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9714297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97142972022-12-02 Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review Zhou, Lifang Xue, Panqi Zhang, Yixin Wei, Fang Zhou, Jiena Wang, Shasha Hu, Yong Lou, Xiaoming Zou, Hua Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Over the decades, many assessment methods have been developed around the world and used for occupational health risk assessment (OHRA). This scoping review integrated the literature on methodological studies of OHRA in China and aimed to identifies the research hot-spots and methodological research perspectives on OHRA in China. METHODS: A scoping review of literature was undertaken to explore the research progress on OHRA methods in China. Focusing on OHRA methods, the authors systematically searched Chinese and English databases and relevant guideline websites from the date of establishment to June 30, 2022. Databases included Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Database. Some other websites were also searched to obtain gray literature. The extracted information included the author, year, region of first author, the target industry, risk assessment model, study type, the main results and conclusions. RESULTS: Finally, 145 of 9,081 studies were included in this review. There were 108 applied studies, 30 comparative studies and 7 optimization studies on OHRA in China. The OHRA methods studied included: (1) qualitative methods such as Romanian model, Australian model, International Council on Mining and Metals model, and Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials; (2) quantitative methods such as the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency inhalation risk assessment model, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic, and Monte Carlo simulation; (3) semi-quantitative methods such as Singapore model, Fuzzy mathematical risk assessment model, Likelihood Exposure Consequence method and Occupational Hazard Risk Index assessment method; (4) comprehensive method (Chinese OHRA standard GBZ/T 298-2017). Each of the OHRA methods had its own strengths and limitations. In order to improve the applicability of OHRA methods, some of them have been optimized by researchers. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of OHRA methods studied in China, including applied, comparative, and optimization studies. Their applicability needs to be further tested through further application in different industries. Furthermore, quantitative comparative studies, optimization studies, and modeling studies are also needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9714297/ /pubmed/36466494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Xue, Zhang, Wei, Zhou, Wang, Hu, Lou and Zou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zhou, Lifang Xue, Panqi Zhang, Yixin Wei, Fang Zhou, Jiena Wang, Shasha Hu, Yong Lou, Xiaoming Zou, Hua Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title | Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title_full | Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title_short | Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review |
title_sort | occupational health risk assessment methods in china: a scoping review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoulifang occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT xuepanqi occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT zhangyixin occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT weifang occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT zhoujiena occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT wangshasha occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT huyong occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT louxiaoming occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview AT zouhua occupationalhealthriskassessmentmethodsinchinaascopingreview |