Cargando…

Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure

INTRODUCTION: Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Richard, Begum, Saleema, Prasad, Raj, Taura, Kojiro, Dasari, Bobby V. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018
_version_ 1784842225187815424
author Bell, Richard
Begum, Saleema
Prasad, Raj
Taura, Kojiro
Dasari, Bobby V. M.
author_facet Bell, Richard
Begum, Saleema
Prasad, Raj
Taura, Kojiro
Dasari, Bobby V. M.
author_sort Bell, Richard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. METHOD: An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy “Post hepatectomy liver failure”, “flow modulation”, “small for size flow syndrome”, “portal vein embolization”, “dual vein embolization”, “ALPPS” and “staged hepatectomy” to identify all articles published relating to this topic. RESULTS: Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. CONCLUSION: The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97144342022-12-02 Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure Bell, Richard Begum, Saleema Prasad, Raj Taura, Kojiro Dasari, Bobby V. M. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. METHOD: An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy “Post hepatectomy liver failure”, “flow modulation”, “small for size flow syndrome”, “portal vein embolization”, “dual vein embolization”, “ALPPS” and “staged hepatectomy” to identify all articles published relating to this topic. RESULTS: Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. CONCLUSION: The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9714434/ /pubmed/36465356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bell, Begum, Prasad, Taura and Dasari https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bell, Richard
Begum, Saleema
Prasad, Raj
Taura, Kojiro
Dasari, Bobby V. M.
Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title_full Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title_fullStr Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title_full_unstemmed Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title_short Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
title_sort volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018
work_keys_str_mv AT bellrichard volumeandflowmodulationstrategiestomitigateposthepatectomyliverfailure
AT begumsaleema volumeandflowmodulationstrategiestomitigateposthepatectomyliverfailure
AT prasadraj volumeandflowmodulationstrategiestomitigateposthepatectomyliverfailure
AT taurakojiro volumeandflowmodulationstrategiestomitigateposthepatectomyliverfailure
AT dasaribobbyvm volumeandflowmodulationstrategiestomitigateposthepatectomyliverfailure