Cargando…
Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand?
INTRODUCTION: Concurrent X‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand (FOOSH) is intended to minimise the risk of an undetected co‐occurring injury and is typically performed on patients aged 0–10 years. The purpose of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35973970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.614 |
_version_ | 1784842242173698048 |
---|---|
author | Sgualdino, Daniel G Neep, Michael J Spuur, Kelly Hughes, Clarissa |
author_facet | Sgualdino, Daniel G Neep, Michael J Spuur, Kelly Hughes, Clarissa |
author_sort | Sgualdino, Daniel G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Concurrent X‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand (FOOSH) is intended to minimise the risk of an undetected co‐occurring injury and is typically performed on patients aged 0–10 years. The purpose of this study was to explore the benefit of this strategy and to identify if age could provide evidence for imaging. METHODS: A 12‐month retrospective review of all X‐ray examinations of the wrist, forearm and distal humerus of patients aged 0–10 years referred from the Emergency Department of Logan Hospital, Queensland was undertaken. The frequency, type and location of radiographic abnormalities and the requested examinations region of interest (ROI), referral notation and patient's age were recorded. Analysis was made by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy‐six examinations met the studies inclusion criteria, 4.8% (n = 23) identified an abnormality outside of the documented ROI. On review of the admission and treatment notes, 1.7% (n = 8) were deemed to have detected traumatic abnormalities as a direct outcome of concurrent imaging. No age‐related evidence for imaging was identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates limited benefit (1.7%) to concurrent imaging following a FOOSH. The results suggest that a thorough physical evaluation of the paediatric upper limb performed by the referrer is sufficient to accurately guide X‐ray imaging. These findings have the potential to positively impact a reduction in the number of X‐rays performed on paediatric patients and in turn contribute to limiting radiation dose. Further studies may be beneficial in verifying the study's findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9714502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97145022022-12-02 Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? Sgualdino, Daniel G Neep, Michael J Spuur, Kelly Hughes, Clarissa J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Concurrent X‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand (FOOSH) is intended to minimise the risk of an undetected co‐occurring injury and is typically performed on patients aged 0–10 years. The purpose of this study was to explore the benefit of this strategy and to identify if age could provide evidence for imaging. METHODS: A 12‐month retrospective review of all X‐ray examinations of the wrist, forearm and distal humerus of patients aged 0–10 years referred from the Emergency Department of Logan Hospital, Queensland was undertaken. The frequency, type and location of radiographic abnormalities and the requested examinations region of interest (ROI), referral notation and patient's age were recorded. Analysis was made by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy‐six examinations met the studies inclusion criteria, 4.8% (n = 23) identified an abnormality outside of the documented ROI. On review of the admission and treatment notes, 1.7% (n = 8) were deemed to have detected traumatic abnormalities as a direct outcome of concurrent imaging. No age‐related evidence for imaging was identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates limited benefit (1.7%) to concurrent imaging following a FOOSH. The results suggest that a thorough physical evaluation of the paediatric upper limb performed by the referrer is sufficient to accurately guide X‐ray imaging. These findings have the potential to positively impact a reduction in the number of X‐rays performed on paediatric patients and in turn contribute to limiting radiation dose. Further studies may be beneficial in verifying the study's findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9714502/ /pubmed/35973970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.614 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sgualdino, Daniel G Neep, Michael J Spuur, Kelly Hughes, Clarissa Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title | Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title_full | Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title_fullStr | Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title_short | Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
title_sort | is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35973970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sgualdinodanielg istherebenefittoconcurrentxrayimagingofthewristforearmandelbowinpaediatricpatientsfollowingafallontheoutstretchedhand AT neepmichaelj istherebenefittoconcurrentxrayimagingofthewristforearmandelbowinpaediatricpatientsfollowingafallontheoutstretchedhand AT spuurkelly istherebenefittoconcurrentxrayimagingofthewristforearmandelbowinpaediatricpatientsfollowingafallontheoutstretchedhand AT hughesclarissa istherebenefittoconcurrentxrayimagingofthewristforearmandelbowinpaediatricpatientsfollowingafallontheoutstretchedhand |