Cargando…

Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting

INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albantow, Christine E, Brown, Savannah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613
_version_ 1784842246150946816
author Albantow, Christine E
Brown, Savannah J
author_facet Albantow, Christine E
Brown, Savannah J
author_sort Albantow, Christine E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to answer the survey. A Microsoft Forms link to the survey was sent to the individual. The survey contained 47 questions in relation to what 3D printing device departments had (if any), how it was being utilised, and what 3D printed products were in use. RESULTS: A total of 112 departments completed the survey (100% response rate), with 22.3% reporting 3D printer ownership, and thirty‐four departments (30.4%) outsourcing 3D printed products. The primary use of 3D printers was bolus production (60.9%). Public departments represented 84% of printer ownership, while private departments were the greatest users of outsourced 3D printed products (91.4%). 3D Slicer was the most common software used for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file conversion (42.3%), while polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) were the most common filaments in use, 46% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research established a baseline for 3D printer and product use within the Australian and New Zealand radiotherapy setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97145172022-12-02 Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting Albantow, Christine E Brown, Savannah J J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to answer the survey. A Microsoft Forms link to the survey was sent to the individual. The survey contained 47 questions in relation to what 3D printing device departments had (if any), how it was being utilised, and what 3D printed products were in use. RESULTS: A total of 112 departments completed the survey (100% response rate), with 22.3% reporting 3D printer ownership, and thirty‐four departments (30.4%) outsourcing 3D printed products. The primary use of 3D printers was bolus production (60.9%). Public departments represented 84% of printer ownership, while private departments were the greatest users of outsourced 3D printed products (91.4%). 3D Slicer was the most common software used for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file conversion (42.3%), while polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) were the most common filaments in use, 46% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research established a baseline for 3D printer and product use within the Australian and New Zealand radiotherapy setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-12 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9714517/ /pubmed/36097141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Albantow, Christine E
Brown, Savannah J
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title_full Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title_fullStr Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title_full_unstemmed Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title_short Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
title_sort three‐dimensional printer use in the australian and new zealand radiation therapy setting
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613
work_keys_str_mv AT albantowchristinee threedimensionalprinteruseintheaustralianandnewzealandradiationtherapysetting
AT brownsavannahj threedimensionalprinteruseintheaustralianandnewzealandradiationtherapysetting