Cargando…
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting
INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613 |
_version_ | 1784842246150946816 |
---|---|
author | Albantow, Christine E Brown, Savannah J |
author_facet | Albantow, Christine E Brown, Savannah J |
author_sort | Albantow, Christine E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to answer the survey. A Microsoft Forms link to the survey was sent to the individual. The survey contained 47 questions in relation to what 3D printing device departments had (if any), how it was being utilised, and what 3D printed products were in use. RESULTS: A total of 112 departments completed the survey (100% response rate), with 22.3% reporting 3D printer ownership, and thirty‐four departments (30.4%) outsourcing 3D printed products. The primary use of 3D printers was bolus production (60.9%). Public departments represented 84% of printer ownership, while private departments were the greatest users of outsourced 3D printed products (91.4%). 3D Slicer was the most common software used for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file conversion (42.3%), while polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) were the most common filaments in use, 46% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research established a baseline for 3D printer and product use within the Australian and New Zealand radiotherapy setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9714517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97145172022-12-02 Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting Albantow, Christine E Brown, Savannah J J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to collect data from radiation therapy departments around Australia and New Zealand to establish a baseline of 3D printer and product use. METHODS: Each department in Australia and New Zealand was contacted to determine the most appropriate person to answer the survey. A Microsoft Forms link to the survey was sent to the individual. The survey contained 47 questions in relation to what 3D printing device departments had (if any), how it was being utilised, and what 3D printed products were in use. RESULTS: A total of 112 departments completed the survey (100% response rate), with 22.3% reporting 3D printer ownership, and thirty‐four departments (30.4%) outsourcing 3D printed products. The primary use of 3D printers was bolus production (60.9%). Public departments represented 84% of printer ownership, while private departments were the greatest users of outsourced 3D printed products (91.4%). 3D Slicer was the most common software used for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file conversion (42.3%), while polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) were the most common filaments in use, 46% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research established a baseline for 3D printer and product use within the Australian and New Zealand radiotherapy setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-12 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9714517/ /pubmed/36097141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Albantow, Christine E Brown, Savannah J Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title |
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title_full |
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title_fullStr |
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title_short |
Three‐dimensional printer use in the Australian and New Zealand radiation therapy setting |
title_sort | three‐dimensional printer use in the australian and new zealand radiation therapy setting |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albantowchristinee threedimensionalprinteruseintheaustralianandnewzealandradiationtherapysetting AT brownsavannahj threedimensionalprinteruseintheaustralianandnewzealandradiationtherapysetting |