Cargando…

Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst

In karst regions, the majority of studies have focused on ecosystem carbon sequestration in the same lithology, but no studies in different lithologies. In this study, actual measurements were used to reveal carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems (Bodinieri cinnamon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuanyuan, Xiang, Huiwen, Huang, Zongsheng, Zhang, Yuanbo, Zou, Jun, Fu, Yuhong, Qian, Changjiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276537
_version_ 1784842320766566400
author Li, Yuanyuan
Xiang, Huiwen
Huang, Zongsheng
Zhang, Yuanbo
Zou, Jun
Fu, Yuhong
Qian, Changjiang
author_facet Li, Yuanyuan
Xiang, Huiwen
Huang, Zongsheng
Zhang, Yuanbo
Zou, Jun
Fu, Yuhong
Qian, Changjiang
author_sort Li, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description In karst regions, the majority of studies have focused on ecosystem carbon sequestration in the same lithology, but no studies in different lithologies. In this study, actual measurements were used to reveal carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems (Bodinieri cinnamon and Cupressus funebris) with different lithologies of karst. The results showed that the tree layer showed the highest vegetation biomass, carbon content, carbon density, and ratio of aboveground biomass to belowground biomass. The carbon density of B. cinnamon plantation and C. funebris plantation was high in dolomite and in limestone respectively. The soil quality and carbon density of bare ground and plantation varied across different lithologies. The carbon density of various ecosystem components was in the order of vegetation>soil>litterfall. The carbon density and net carbon density of plantation varied across different lithologies. In B. cinnamon plantation, the carbon sequestration rate of vegetation and ecosystem was high in dolomite, moderate in limestone, and low in dolomitic sandstone. In Cupressus funebris plantation, the carbon sequestration rate was in the order of limestone>dolomite>dolomitic sandstone. These findings revealed that lithology is an important factor affecting ecosystem carbon pools, and plantation ecosystems have low biomass and low carbon density in karst areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9714837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97148372022-12-02 Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst Li, Yuanyuan Xiang, Huiwen Huang, Zongsheng Zhang, Yuanbo Zou, Jun Fu, Yuhong Qian, Changjiang PLoS One Research Article In karst regions, the majority of studies have focused on ecosystem carbon sequestration in the same lithology, but no studies in different lithologies. In this study, actual measurements were used to reveal carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems (Bodinieri cinnamon and Cupressus funebris) with different lithologies of karst. The results showed that the tree layer showed the highest vegetation biomass, carbon content, carbon density, and ratio of aboveground biomass to belowground biomass. The carbon density of B. cinnamon plantation and C. funebris plantation was high in dolomite and in limestone respectively. The soil quality and carbon density of bare ground and plantation varied across different lithologies. The carbon density of various ecosystem components was in the order of vegetation>soil>litterfall. The carbon density and net carbon density of plantation varied across different lithologies. In B. cinnamon plantation, the carbon sequestration rate of vegetation and ecosystem was high in dolomite, moderate in limestone, and low in dolomitic sandstone. In Cupressus funebris plantation, the carbon sequestration rate was in the order of limestone>dolomite>dolomitic sandstone. These findings revealed that lithology is an important factor affecting ecosystem carbon pools, and plantation ecosystems have low biomass and low carbon density in karst areas. Public Library of Science 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9714837/ /pubmed/36454917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276537 Text en © 2022 Li et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yuanyuan
Xiang, Huiwen
Huang, Zongsheng
Zhang, Yuanbo
Zou, Jun
Fu, Yuhong
Qian, Changjiang
Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title_full Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title_fullStr Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title_full_unstemmed Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title_short Carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
title_sort carbon sequestration characteristics of two plantation forest ecosystems with different lithologies of karst
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276537
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuanyuan carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT xianghuiwen carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT huangzongsheng carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT zhangyuanbo carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT zoujun carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT fuyuhong carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst
AT qianchangjiang carbonsequestrationcharacteristicsoftwoplantationforestecosystemswithdifferentlithologiesofkarst