Cargando…

Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans

The role of natural selection in shaping biological diversity is an area of intense interest in modern biology. To date, studies of positive selection have primarily relied on genomic datasets from contemporary populations, which are susceptible to confounding factors associated with complex and oft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souilmi, Yassine, Tobler, Raymond, Johar, Angad, Williams, Matthew, Grey, Shane T., Schmidt, Joshua, Teixeira, João C., Rohrlach, Adam, Tuke, Jonathan, Johnson, Olivia, Gower, Graham, Turney, Chris, Cox, Murray, Cooper, Alan, Huber, Christian D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01914-9
_version_ 1784842448227270656
author Souilmi, Yassine
Tobler, Raymond
Johar, Angad
Williams, Matthew
Grey, Shane T.
Schmidt, Joshua
Teixeira, João C.
Rohrlach, Adam
Tuke, Jonathan
Johnson, Olivia
Gower, Graham
Turney, Chris
Cox, Murray
Cooper, Alan
Huber, Christian D.
author_facet Souilmi, Yassine
Tobler, Raymond
Johar, Angad
Williams, Matthew
Grey, Shane T.
Schmidt, Joshua
Teixeira, João C.
Rohrlach, Adam
Tuke, Jonathan
Johnson, Olivia
Gower, Graham
Turney, Chris
Cox, Murray
Cooper, Alan
Huber, Christian D.
author_sort Souilmi, Yassine
collection PubMed
description The role of natural selection in shaping biological diversity is an area of intense interest in modern biology. To date, studies of positive selection have primarily relied on genomic datasets from contemporary populations, which are susceptible to confounding factors associated with complex and often unknown aspects of population history. In particular, admixture between diverged populations can distort or hide prior selection events in modern genomes, though this process is not explicitly accounted for in most selection studies despite its apparent ubiquity in humans and other species. Through analyses of ancient and modern human genomes, we show that previously reported Holocene-era admixture has masked more than 50 historic hard sweeps in modern European genomes. Our results imply that this canonical mode of selection has probably been underappreciated in the evolutionary history of humans and suggest that our current understanding of the tempo and mode of selection in natural populations may be inaccurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9715430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97154302022-12-03 Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans Souilmi, Yassine Tobler, Raymond Johar, Angad Williams, Matthew Grey, Shane T. Schmidt, Joshua Teixeira, João C. Rohrlach, Adam Tuke, Jonathan Johnson, Olivia Gower, Graham Turney, Chris Cox, Murray Cooper, Alan Huber, Christian D. Nat Ecol Evol Article The role of natural selection in shaping biological diversity is an area of intense interest in modern biology. To date, studies of positive selection have primarily relied on genomic datasets from contemporary populations, which are susceptible to confounding factors associated with complex and often unknown aspects of population history. In particular, admixture between diverged populations can distort or hide prior selection events in modern genomes, though this process is not explicitly accounted for in most selection studies despite its apparent ubiquity in humans and other species. Through analyses of ancient and modern human genomes, we show that previously reported Holocene-era admixture has masked more than 50 historic hard sweeps in modern European genomes. Our results imply that this canonical mode of selection has probably been underappreciated in the evolutionary history of humans and suggest that our current understanding of the tempo and mode of selection in natural populations may be inaccurate. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9715430/ /pubmed/36316412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01914-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Souilmi, Yassine
Tobler, Raymond
Johar, Angad
Williams, Matthew
Grey, Shane T.
Schmidt, Joshua
Teixeira, João C.
Rohrlach, Adam
Tuke, Jonathan
Johnson, Olivia
Gower, Graham
Turney, Chris
Cox, Murray
Cooper, Alan
Huber, Christian D.
Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title_full Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title_fullStr Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title_full_unstemmed Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title_short Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
title_sort admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01914-9
work_keys_str_mv AT souilmiyassine admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT toblerraymond admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT joharangad admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT williamsmatthew admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT greyshanet admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT schmidtjoshua admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT teixeirajoaoc admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT rohrlachadam admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT tukejonathan admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT johnsonolivia admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT gowergraham admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT turneychris admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT coxmurray admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT cooperalan admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans
AT huberchristiand admixturehasobscuredsignalsofhistoricalhardsweepsinhumans